BACKGROUND: There have been no large cohort reports detailing the wounding patterns and mechanisms in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: The Joint Theater Trauma Registry was queried for all US service members receiving treatment for wounds (International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. codes 800-960) sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom from October 2001 through January 2005. Returned-to-duty and nonbattle injuries were excluded from final analysis. RESULTS: This query resulted in 3,102 casualties, of which 31% were classified as nonbattle injuries and 18% were returned-to-duty within 72 hours. A total of 1,566 combatants sustained 6,609 combat wounds. The locations of these wounds were as follows: head (8%), eyes (6%), ears (3%), face (10%), neck (3%), thorax (6%), abdomen (11%), and extremity (54%). The proportion of head and neck wounds is higher (p < 0.0001) than the proportion experienced in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam wars (16%-21%). The proportion of thoracic wounds is a decrease (p < 0.0001) from World War II and Vietnam (13%). The proportion of gunshot wounds was 18%, whereas the proportion sustained from explosions was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: The wounding patterns currently seen in Iraq and Afghanistan resemble the patterns from previous conflicts, with some notable exceptions: a greater proportion of head and neck wounds, and a lower proportion of thoracic wounds. An explosive mechanism accounted for 78% of injuries, which is the highest proportion seen in any large-scale conflict.
BACKGROUND: There have been no large cohort reports detailing the wounding patterns and mechanisms in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: The Joint Theater Trauma Registry was queried for all US service members receiving treatment for wounds (International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. codes 800-960) sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom from October 2001 through January 2005. Returned-to-duty and nonbattle injuries were excluded from final analysis. RESULTS: This query resulted in 3,102 casualties, of which 31% were classified as nonbattle injuries and 18% were returned-to-duty within 72 hours. A total of 1,566 combatants sustained 6,609 combat wounds. The locations of these wounds were as follows: head (8%), eyes (6%), ears (3%), face (10%), neck (3%), thorax (6%), abdomen (11%), and extremity (54%). The proportion of head and neck wounds is higher (p < 0.0001) than the proportion experienced in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam wars (16%-21%). The proportion of thoracic wounds is a decrease (p < 0.0001) from World War II and Vietnam (13%). The proportion of gunshot wounds was 18%, whereas the proportion sustained from explosions was 78%. CONCLUSIONS: The wounding patterns currently seen in Iraq and Afghanistan resemble the patterns from previous conflicts, with some notable exceptions: a greater proportion of head and neck wounds, and a lower proportion of thoracic wounds. An explosive mechanism accounted for 78% of injuries, which is the highest proportion seen in any large-scale conflict.
Authors: Arul Ramasamy; Spyros D Masouros; Nicolas Newell; Adam M Hill; William G Proud; Katherine A Brown; Anthony M J Bull; Jon C Clasper Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Nami Han; Mohammad A Yabroudi; Kristen Stearns-Reider; Wendy Helkowski; Brian M Sicari; J Peter Rubin; Stephen F Badylak; Michael L Boninger; Fabrisia Ambrosio Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2015-11-12
Authors: Daniel P Crane; Kirill Gromov; Dan Li; Kjeld Søballe; Christian Wahnes; Hubert Büchner; Matthew J Hilton; Regis J O'Keefe; Clinton K Murray; Edward M Schwarz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Shannon E Anderson; Woojin M Han; Vunya Srinivasa; Mahir Mohiuddin; Marissa A Ruehle; June Young Moon; Eunjung Shin; Cheryl L San Emeterio; Molly E Ogle; Edward A Botchwey; Nick J Willett; Young C Jang Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Michael D Goodman; Amy T Makley; Alex B Lentsch; Stephen L Barnes; Gina R Dorlac; Warren C Dorlac; Jay A Johannigman; Timothy A Pritts Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2009-08-26 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Brian M Sicari; Vineet Agrawal; Bernard F Siu; Christopher J Medberry; Christopher L Dearth; Neill J Turner; Stephen F Badylak Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.845