David Picker1, Maria Dans, Kevin Heard, Thomas Bailey, Yixin Chen, Chenyang Lu, Marin H Kollef. 1. 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 2Palliative Care Services, Department of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO. 3Center for Clinical Excellence, BJC HealthCare, St. Louis, MO. 4Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 5Department of Medicine, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an Early Warning System could identify patients wishing to focus on palliative care measures. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, pilot study. SETTING: Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, MO (January 15, 2015, to December 12, 2015). PATIENTS: A total of 206 patients; 89 intervention (43.2%) and 117 controls (56.8%). INTERVENTIONS: Palliative care in high-risk patients targeted by an Early Warning System. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Advanced directive documentation was significantly greater prior to discharge in the intervention group (37.1% vs 15.4%; p < 0.001) as were first-time requests for advanced directive documentation (14.6% vs 0.0%; p < 0.001). Documentation of resuscitation status was also greater prior to discharge in the intervention group (36.0% vs 23.1%; p = 0.043). There was no difference in the number of patients requesting a change in resuscitation status between groups (11.2% vs 9.4%; p = 0.666). However, changes in resuscitation status occurred earlier and on the general medicine units for the intervention group compared to the control group. The number of patients transferred to an ICU was significantly lower for intervention patients (12.4% vs 27.4%; p = 0.009). The median (interquartile range) ICU length of stay was significantly less for the intervention group (0 [0-0] vs 0 [0-1] d; p = 0.014). Hospital mortality was similar (12.4% vs 10.3%; p = 0.635). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that automated Early Warning System alerts can identify patients potentially benefitting from directed palliative care discussions and reduce the number of ICU transfers.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an Early Warning System could identify patients wishing to focus on palliative care measures. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, pilot study. SETTING: Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, MO (January 15, 2015, to December 12, 2015). PATIENTS: A total of 206 patients; 89 intervention (43.2%) and 117 controls (56.8%). INTERVENTIONS: Palliative care in high-risk patients targeted by an Early Warning System. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Advanced directive documentation was significantly greater prior to discharge in the intervention group (37.1% vs 15.4%; p < 0.001) as were first-time requests for advanced directive documentation (14.6% vs 0.0%; p < 0.001). Documentation of resuscitation status was also greater prior to discharge in the intervention group (36.0% vs 23.1%; p = 0.043). There was no difference in the number of patients requesting a change in resuscitation status between groups (11.2% vs 9.4%; p = 0.666). However, changes in resuscitation status occurred earlier and on the general medicine units for the intervention group compared to the control group. The number of patients transferred to an ICU was significantly lower for intervention patients (12.4% vs 27.4%; p = 0.009). The median (interquartile range) ICU length of stay was significantly less for the intervention group (0 [0-0] vs 0 [0-1] d; p = 0.014). Hospital mortality was similar (12.4% vs 10.3%; p = 0.635). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that automated Early Warning System alerts can identify patients potentially benefitting from directed palliative care discussions and reduce the number of ICU transfers.
Authors: Jessica Ma; Stephen Chi; Benjamin Buettner; Katherine Pollard; Monica Muir; Charu Kolekar; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ling Chen; Marin Kollef; Maria Dans Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Laura Evans; Andrew Rhodes; Waleed Alhazzani; Massimo Antonelli; Craig M Coopersmith; Craig French; Flávia R Machado; Lauralyn Mcintyre; Marlies Ostermann; Hallie C Prescott; Christa Schorr; Steven Simpson; W Joost Wiersinga; Fayez Alshamsi; Derek C Angus; Yaseen Arabi; Luciano Azevedo; Richard Beale; Gregory Beilman; Emilie Belley-Cote; Lisa Burry; Maurizio Cecconi; John Centofanti; Angel Coz Yataco; Jan De Waele; R Phillip Dellinger; Kent Doi; Bin Du; Elisa Estenssoro; Ricard Ferrer; Charles Gomersall; Carol Hodgson; Morten Hylander Møller; Theodore Iwashyna; Shevin Jacob; Ruth Kleinpell; Michael Klompas; Younsuck Koh; Anand Kumar; Arthur Kwizera; Suzana Lobo; Henry Masur; Steven McGloughlin; Sangeeta Mehta; Yatin Mehta; Mervyn Mer; Mark Nunnally; Simon Oczkowski; Tiffany Osborn; Elizabeth Papathanassoglou; Anders Perner; Michael Puskarich; Jason Roberts; William Schweickert; Maureen Seckel; Jonathan Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Tobias Welte; Janice Zimmerman; Mitchell Levy Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-10-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Stephen Chi; Aixia Guo; Kevin Heard; Seunghwan Kim; Randi Foraker; Patrick White; Nathan Moore Journal: Med Care Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: João Gabriel Rosa Ramos; Fernanda Correia Tourinho; Patrícia Borrione; Paula Azi; Tuanny Andrade; Vanessa Costa; Zan Reis; Paulo Benigno Pena Batista; Ana Verena Mendes Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2018-09-03