| Literature DB >> 27768599 |
Yong-Sik Bong1, Shahin Assefnia1, Therese Tuohy2, Deborah W Neklason2, Randall W Burt2, Jaeil Ahn3, Paul J Bueno De Mesquita1, Stephen W Byers1.
Abstract
Vitamin D is implicated in the etiology of cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, usually characterized by alteration in the APC/β-catenin/TCF tumor suppressor pathway. The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is also implicated in cardiovascular and skin diseases as well as in immunity. Activated VDR can indirectly alter β-catenin nuclear localization and directly suppress β-catenin/TCF mediated transcriptional activity. We treated VDR null mice with the carcinogen azoxymethane (AOM) and generated mice bearing a mutated APC (hypomorph) on a VDR null background (Apc1638N/+Vdr-/-). VDR null mice do not develop GI or extra-colonic tumors but loss of VDR decreased intestinal tumor latency and increased progression to adenocarcinoma in both models. AOM treatment of VDR null mice also caused squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Although levels and distribution of total or activated β-catenin in the epithelial component of tumors were unaffected by loss of VDR, β-catenin dependent cyclin D1 expression was affected suggesting a direct VDR effect on β-catenin co-activator activity. Extra-colonic mucosa manifestations in Apc1638N/+Vdr-/- animals included increased nuclear β-catenin in submucosal stromal cells, spleno- and cardiomegaly and large epidermoid cysts characteristic of the FAP variant, Gardner's syndrome. Consistent with this, SNPs in the VDR, vitamin D binding protein and CYP24 as well as mutations in APC distal to codon 850 were strongly associated with Gardners syndrome in a cohort of 457 FAP patients, This work suggests that alterations in the vitamin D/VDR axis are important in Gardner's syndrome, as well as in the etiology of anal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: anal cancer; azoxymethane; colon cancer; gardner’s syndrome; vitamin D receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27768599 PMCID: PMC5348337 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Loss of VDR does not affect tumor incidence and multiplicity but significantly increases aberrant crypt foci in the intestine of Apc mice
(A) Comparison of small intestinal tumor incidence (left) and multiplicity (right) between Apc/+ (n = 15 at 6 months 0.7333 ± 0.372, n = 20 at 12 months 3.8 ± 0.7384 and Apc/+Vdr− (n = 16 at 6 months 1.438 ± 0.3870, n = 19 at 12 months 3.474 ± 0.6277) mice. Each dot corresponds to one mouse and the horizontal line indicates the mean. *P < 0.032, Student's test. (B) Comparison of large intestinal tumor incidence (left) and multiplicity (right) between Apc/+ (n = 15 at 6 months 0.6 ± 0.3207, n = 20 at 12 months 4.6 ± 1 .396 and Apc/+Vdr− (n = 16 at 6 months 2.125 ± 0.9259, n = 19 at 12 months 3.789 ± 1.005) mice. Each dot corresponds to one mouse and the horizontal line indicates the mean. (C) Methylene blue staining of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in proximal colon of Apc− mice. (D) Comparison of ACF incidence (left) and multiplicity (right) between Apc/+ (n = 15 at 6 months, 8.467± 2.811, n = 20 at 12 months, 15.20 ± 3.115) and Apc− (n = 15 at 6 months 19.33 ± 5.2, n = 19 at 12 months 57.84 ± 8.144), ***P < 0.0001, Student's test. Each dot (right) represents one mouse and the horizontal line indicates the mean. (E) Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining images of intestinal tumors from Apc (upper) and Apc/+Vdr− (lower). Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) Comparison of tumor progression at 12 months between Apc and Apc/+Vdr− mice. **P = 0.0075, two-tailed Chi-Square test. (G) Immunodetection of Paneth cells using an anti-lysozyme antibody in sections from the jejunum of each genotype analyzed. Scale bar, 200 μm. (H) Staining of Goblet cells using an alcian blue in sections from proximal colon of each genotype analyzed. Shown in G and H are representative images of Paneth and Goblet cell differentiation defect by loss of VDR expression. Scale bar, 200 μm. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 2VDR deficiency does not increase β-catenin nuclear localization in tumor sections of Apc mice compared to that of Apc but significantly activates cyclin D1 gene expression at the crypt base of normal epithelia and tumor cells in Apc mice
(A) Immunostaining of β-catenin localization using an anti-active β-catenin antibody in tumor sections of Apc (upper left), Apcmin/+ (lower left), and Apc(upper/lower right). Representative images are shown. Arrows indicate β-catenin in the nucleus and arrowheads depict staining of β-catenin in the stroma. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Immunostaining of cyclin D1, a β-catenin target gene, in normal crypt base epithelial cells of each genotype analyzed. Scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Representative images with quantification of cyclin D1 positive cells in sections of normal epithelial cells from each genotype examined. Cells with blue nuclei were considered negative, while cells with brown nuclei were considered positive. The expression of cyclin-D1 was calculated as number of positive cells in 25 complete crypts from at least 3 mice of each genotype. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. aP = 0.0001, bP = 0.0001, cP < 0.0001, dP < 0.0001, eP = 0.0047 determined by two-tailed t-test. (D) Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining of tumors derived from Apc (upper left) and Apc− mice (upper right) with Immunostaining of cyclin D1 using an antibody in colon tumor sections of Apc (lower left) and Apc− mice (lower right). Scale bar, 50 μm. (E) Analysis of apoptotic cells by immunostaining of normal large intestinal cells with an anti-active caspase-3 antibody in sections from proximal colon of each genotype analyzed. Representative images are shown. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Figure 3Treatment with azoxymethane does not affect tumor incidence but significantly increases tumor multiplicity in VDR KO mice
(A) Comparison of intestinal tumor incidence (left) and multiplicity (right) between Vdr (n = 37, tumor multiplicity 2.270 ± 0.6183) and Vdr− (n = 32, tumor multiplicity 8.344 ± 1.209 ***P < 0.0001, Two-tailed Student's t test) mice. Each dot corresponds to one mouse and the horizontal line indicates the mean. (B) Representative images of tumors induced by AOM injection in large intestine from Vdr (left) and Vdr− (right) mice. White arrows indicates tumor observed in each genotypes. (C) Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining images of intestinal tumors from Vdr (upper left) and Vdr− (upper right) with magnified images in the lower panel. The dashed line demarcates adenocarcinoma observed in VDR KO mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Comparison of tumor progression to adenoma or adenocarcinoma between Vdr and Vdr− mice (*P < 0.0375, Two-tailed Fisher's test). (E) Representative image of squamous cell carcinoma in the anus of Vdr− mice. (F) Comparison of squamous cell carcinoma incidence between Vdr(n = 37) and Vdr− mice (n = 32 *P < 0.0208 Fisher's exact test). (G) Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining images of squamous cell carcinoma from Vdr− (upper panel) and immunostaining of activated β-catenin (lower left) and cyclin D1 in tumor sections (lower right). Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 4Loss of VDR in Apc mice induces extra-colonic lesions such as epidermoid cysts, splenomegaly, and cardiomegaly
(A), Representative images of various kinds of skin manifestations such as epidermal cysts, pilomatricoma, fibroma, and pigmented skin lesions in Apc mice. (B) Comparison of epidermal cyst incidence (right, **P < 0.0002 and ***P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test) and multiplicity (left) at age of 6 and 12 months. Each dot (right) represents one mouse examined and the horizontal line indicates the mean (n = 16 at 6 months. 6.563 ± 2.041 vs n = 19 15.16 ± 1.466, **P < 0.0014, the two-tailed Student's t-test). (C) Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining images of skin tissues from WT (upper left), Vdr (upper right), and Apc (lower panel), respectively. Scale bar in C, D, and E, 100 μm. (1) Immunostaining of activated β-catenin in skin sections of WT (upper left), Vdr (upper right), and Apc (lower panel), respectively. (E) Immunostaining of cell proliferation using anti-Ki-67 antibody in skin sections of WT (upper left), Vdr (upper right), and Apc (lower panel), respectively. (F) Representative images of spleen in WT and Vdr mice. (G) Comparison of spleen to body weight ratio among different genetic groups. (WT = 11, 2.909 ± 0.2208, Vdr = 6, 8.085 ± 1.156, Apc = 17, 8.767 ± 1.263 and Apc = 16, 17.97 ± 1.835, aP < 0.0001, bP = 0.0011, cP = 0.0048, dP < 0.0001, and eP = 0.0002, Two-sided Student's t-test). (H) Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining of spleen from WT (upper left), and Apc (upper right), respectively. Scale bar, 500 μm. Immunodetection of cell proliferation using anti-Ki-67 antibody in WT (lower left) and Apc (lower right). Scale bar, 50 μm. (I), Representative images of heart from WT and Apc mice. (J), Comparison of heart to body weight ratio among different genetic groups. (WT = 7, 4.533 ± 0.4623, Vdr = 5, 6.194 ± 0.5977, Apc = 16, 5.819 ± 0.6287 and Apc = 13, 9.371 ± 0.7005, aP = 0.0494, bP = 0.0179, cP = 0.0008, and dP = 0.0002, Two-sided Student's t-test). K, Representative hematoxylin/eosin staining of heart from WT (left), and Apc (right), respectively Scale bar, 500 μm.
Associations between the extracolonic lesions and location of APC mutations in FAP patients
| Cases with lesions | Cases without lesions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesions | Codon 1–850 | Codon 851–1979 | Codon 1–850 | Codon 851–1979 | OR | 95% CI |
| Desmoid tumor | 14 | 19 | 47 | 16 | 3.987 | (1.631–9.742) |
| Epidermal cyst | 11 | 19 | 62 | 27 | 3.966 | (1.663–461) |
| Fibroma | 2 | 8 | 12 | 5 | 9.6 | (1.438–62.164) |
| Lipoma | 5 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 3.6 | (0.778–16.662) |
| Osteomsa | 21 | 29 | 54 | 11 | 6.779 | (2.875–15.985) |
| Combined ALL | 37 | 41 | 72 | 13 | 6.137 | (2.931–12.853) |
Associations between SNPs in VDR, GC, CYP24A1 genes and the combined extracolonic lesions risk in FAP patients
| SNP | ORs and 95% CI | ORs and 95% CI | ORs and 95% CI | ORs and 95% CI | ORs and 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fok1 (rs2228570) | FF vs. ff | Ff vs. ff | FF + Ff vs. ff | FF vs. Ff | FF vs. Ff +ff |
| 0.471 (0.165–1.344) | 0.418 (0.144–1.208) | 0.446 (0.162–1.227) | 1.152 (0.636–2.078) | 0.961 (0.547–1.688) | |
| Bsm1 (rs1544410) | BB vs. bb | Bb vs. bb | BB + Bb vs. bb | BB vs. Bb | BB vs. Bb + bb |
| 1.387 (0.619–3.107) | 0.585 (0.305–1.119) | 0.764 (0.418–1.397) | 1.9 (0.934–3.865) | ||
| Taq1 (rs731236) | TT vs. tt | Tt vs. tt | TT + Tt vs. tt | TT vs. Tt | TT vs. Tt + tt |
| 1.042 (0.452–2.404) | 0.836 (0.382–1.827) | 0.911 (0.434–1.913) | 1.247 (0.661–2.355) | 1.19 (0.652–2.147) | |
| Apa1 (rs7975232) | AA vs. aa | Aa vs. aa | AA + Aa vs. aa | AA vs. Aa | AA vs. Aa + aa |
| 0.808 (0.372–1.754) | 0.667 (0.351–1.265) | 0.71 (0.393–1.283) | 1.5 (0.79–2.847) | 1.408 (0.78–2.544) | |
| GC Protein (r24588) | G/G vs. A/C | G/G vs. A/A | G/G + A/C vs. A/A | A/C vs. A/A | G/G vs. A/C + A/A |
| 2.905 (0.822–10.271) | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | ||
| CYP24A1 (rs2296241) | A/A vs. A/G | A/A vs. G/G | A/A + A/G vs. G/G | A/G vs. G/G | A/A vs. A/G + G/G |
| 1.492 (0.761–2.925) | 1.333 (0.62–2.869) | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
Associations between the SNPs in VDR, GC, CYP24A1 and the location of APC mutations in FAP patients
| SNP | Codon 1–850 | Codon 850–1997 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fok1(rs2228570) | FF vs. ff | Ff vs. ff | FF vs. Ff | FF vs. Ff |
| 0.641 (0.332–1.238) | 1.729 (0.547–5.466) | 1.366 (0.689–2.71) | 0.304 (0.664–1.443) | |
| Bsm1(rs1544410) | BB vs. bb | Bb vs. bb | BB vs. bb | BB vs. bb |
| 0.417(0.183–0.95) | 0.807 (0.335–1.946) | 1.761 (0.722–4.295) | 1.5 (0.578–3.89) | |
| Taq1(rs731236) | TT vs. tt | Tt vs. tt | TT vs. Tt | TT vs. Tt |
| 0.759 (0.374–1.538) | 0.813 (0.325–2.03) | 1.292 (0.606–2.756) | 1.263 (0.447–3.347) | |
| Apa1(rs7975232) | AA vs. aa | Aa vs. aa | AA vs. Aa | AA vs. Aa |
| 0.652 (0.321–1.324) | 1.01 (0.433–2.357) | 1.563 (0.731–3.339) | 1.37 (0.554–3.385) | |
| GC Protein(r24588) | G/G vs. A/C | G/G vs. A/A | G/G vs. A/G | A/C vs. A/A |
| 0.475 (0.246–0.917) | 0.175 (0.034–0.891) | 1.391 (0.321–6.024) | ||
| CYP24A1(rs2296241) | A/A vs. A/G | A/A vs. G/G | A/A vs. A/G | A/G vs. G/G |
| 0.692 (0.323–1.483) | 1.333 (0.62–2.869) | 1.667(0.72–3.858) | 1.759 (0.709–4.36) | |