Literature DB >> 27767385

Distinction between fear and surprise: an interpretation-independent test of the perceptual-attentional limitation hypothesis.

Justin Chamberland1, Annie Roy-Charland1, Melanie Perron1, Joël Dickinson1.   

Abstract

The perceptual-attentional limitation hypothesis posits that the confusion between emotional facial expressions of fear and surprise may be due to their visual similarity, with shared muscle movements. In Experiment 1 full face images of fear and surprise varying as a function of distinctiveness (mouth index, brow index, or both indices) were displayed in a gender oddball task. Experiment 2, in a similar task, directed attention toward the eye or mouth region with a blurring technique. The current two studies used response time and event-related potentials (ERP) to test the perceptual-attentional limitation hypothesis. While ERP results for Experiment 1 suggested that individuals may not have perceived a difference between the emotional expressions in any of the conditions, response time results suggested that individuals processed a difference between fear and surprise when a distinctive cue was in the mouth. With directed attention in Experiment 2, ERP results indicated that individuals were capable of detecting a difference in all the conditions. In effect, the current two experiments suggest that participants display difficulty in distinguishing the prototypes of fear and surprise with the eye region, which may be due to a lack of attention to that region, providing support for the attentional limitation hypothesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotion; Fear and surprise; attention; blur; event-related potentials (ERP); perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27767385     DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1251964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  6 in total

1.  Foveal processing of emotion-informative facial features.

Authors:  Nazire Duran; Anthony P Atkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Iranian emotional face database: Acquisition and validation of a stimulus set of basic facial expressions.

Authors:  Faeze Heydari; Saber Sheybani; Ali Yoonessi
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-16

3.  The effects of face coverings, own-ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition.

Authors:  Holly Cooper; Amrit Brar; Hazel Beyaztas; Ben J Jennings; Rachel J Bennetts
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-02

4.  How does the presence of a surgical face mask impair the perceived intensity of facial emotions?

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Vita Podgajecka; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Face masks impair facial emotion recognition and induce specific emotion confusions.

Authors:  Maximilian A Primbs; Iris A M Verpaalen; Mike Rinck; Gijsbert Bijlstra
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-09-05

6.  Small Pupils Lead to Lower Judgements of a Person's Characteristics for Exaggerated, but Not for Realistic Pupils.

Authors:  Wee Kiat Lau; Marian Sauter; Anke Huckauf
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.