Literature DB >> 27767381

The effect of SNPs in CYP450 in chloroquine/primaquine Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment.

Vinicius A Sortica1, Juliana D Lindenau1, Maristela G Cunha2, Maria DO Ohnishi3, Ana Maria R Ventura3, Ândrea Kc Ribeiro-Dos-Santos4, Sidney Eb Santos4, Luciano Sp Guimarães5, Mara H Hutz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chloroquine/primaquine is the current therapy to eliminate Plasmodium vivax infection in the Amazon region. AIMS: This study investigates CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms influence on cloroquine/primaquine treatment. PATIENTS &
METHODS: Generalized estimating equations analyses were performed to determine the genetic influence in parasitemia and/or gametocytemia clearance over treatment time in 164 patients.
RESULTS: An effect of CYP2C8 low-activity alleles on treatment was observed (p = 0.01). From baseline to first day of treatment, wild-type individuals achieved greater reduction of gametocytes than low-activity allele carriers. CYP2C9 and CYP3A5 genes showed a trend for gametocytemia and parasitemia clearance rates.
CONCLUSION: Future studies should be performed to access the extent of CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms influence on cloroquine/primaquine treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ; chloroquine; malaria; pharmacogenomics; primaquine; treatment

Year:  2016        PMID: 27767381      PMCID: PMC7099632          DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


First draft submitted: 27 July 2016; Accepted for publication: 25 August 2016; Published online: 21 October 2016

Mean gametocytemia level reduction during chloroquine/primaquine regimen according to

Generalized Estimating Equations method with age, gender, co-medication, gametocytemia baseline level and genetic ancestry as co-variates; p = 0.01 and d = 0.44.

Effect in mean gametocytemia reduction from baseline during choloroquine/primaquine regimen comparing

Generalized Estimating Equations method. Day 1, p = 0.007; day 2, p = 0.15; and day 3, p = 0.10.

Background

Individual variation in drug disposition and response make effective drug prescribing a clinical challenge. Differences in drug response make the usual dosage regimen therapeutically effective in most patients, but some individuals do not experience any beneficial effect or suffer from drug toxicity. Genetic polymorphisms are major factors in Phase I and II metabolizing enzymes that influence pharmacokinetics in drug response [1]. Tropical diseases usually need multiple drug therapies to control infections that make pharmacogenetic studies in such diseases still more complex. Plasmodium vivax is the major cause of malaria disease outside Africa, and it is an important morbidity and mortality factor in the Amazonian region [2]. The WHO recommended chloroquine (CQ) and primaquine (PQ) combined therapy as first choice treatment protocol for uncomplicated P. vivax malaria in CQ susceptible areas [2,3]. CQ is a 4-aminoquinoline derivative of quinine, and has been the most widely used antimalarial drug since 1946. This drug has effects as schizontocide and gametocide, and is metabolized by CYP450 isozymes 2C8, 3A4, 3A5 and, to a lesser extent, 2D6 [4-6]. The 8-aminoquinoline PQ, a quinine derivative, is an important gametocytocide and also is the unique effective drug against P. vivax and Plasmodium ovale hypnozoites. PQ is metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP2D6 and CYPC19 isoforms in different extent to form diverse metabolites [7-10]. This drug could lead to severe hemolytic anemia in subjects with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency and this condition needs to be investigated before PQ prescription in some populations [11]. Interindividual variability in CQ and PQ concentrations and effect was reported in Africa and Asia, which may affect treatment outcome in these populations [12-17]. P. vivax resistance to CQ, treatment noncompliance, medication suboptimum dose, patient health and/or nutritional status, drug–drug interactions are some factors that could lead to treatment failure [18]. However, genetic polymorphisms in CQ and PQ metabolizing enzymes that might influence drug availability and response to malaria therapeutic regimen were never investigated; therefore, the present study aims to evaluate whether genetic polymorphisms in G6PD, CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CP2C9, CP3A4 and CYP3A5 influence P. vivax malaria treatment response.

Patients & methods

Study population

The study cohort consisted of 164 P. vivax malaria patients followed during malaria treatment period from 2007 to 2009. All subjects were born in Pará state in the Brazilian Amazonian region, which presents different risk of infection and transmission among distinct regions and cities [19]. Patients were diagnosed and treated in Belém, Pará state at the Evandro Chagas Institute. Patients were aged between 12 and 88 years (36.0 ± 15.6 years). Twenty-nine patients (17.6%) use other medications in combination to CQ and PQ to treat malaria symptoms or pre-existing diseases. Sample collection and ancestry determination were previously described [20]. Patients were clinically examined and received the standard 1500 mg of CQ associated with 210 mg of PQ treatment in a short regimen as recommended by the Brazilian health authorities [21]. The therapeutic regimen was administered as CQ 600 mg and PQ 30 mg in the first day, followed by CQ 450 mg and PQ 30 mg in the second and third days, and PQ 30 mg in the last 4 days to all patients included in the study. This schedule was used because according to the Brazilian health authorities a shorter treatment time facilitates treatment adhesion in isolated Amazonian regions. Treatment response was daily accompanied by clinical examinations. P. vivax asexual and sexual (gametocyte) forms density per μl of blood was daily estimated by counting the number of parasites per 100 fields and double-checked blindly by two expert microscopists as recommended by Brazilian ministry of health [22]. Patients were followed at the Evandro Chagas Institute for 6 months to identify relapse episodes. This follow-up time is the expected period in which relapses are expected to occur in the Amazonian region [23]. Patients were only considered with relapses if they presented malaria symptoms again and reside in urban areas with no risk of malaria transmission and did not travel to endemic areas. The incidence of malarial infections in the Brazilian Amazonian region was estimated as 6.3/1000 inhabitants. However, the transmission rate is variable in different localities. Usually it is higher in gold-digging areas and lower or absent in urban areas [19]. All subjects provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The Ethics Committees of the Evandro Chagas Institute and Federal University of Pará approved the study protocol.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA from all patients was extracted from subject's peripheral blood leukocytes using proteinase K digestion and standard phenolchloroform procedures [24]. Reactions were performed in a total of 8 μl containing 10 ng of genomic DNA. The 13 SNPs in CYP450 and G6PD genes were determined by allelic discrimination assays (7500 Real Time PCR System®, Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) using Taqman 5′-nuclease assays® (Applied Biosystems) (Table 1), according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol.

List of SNPs genotyped in the present study.

GeneSNPdbSNP IDAssay ID
CYP1A2-360G>Ars2069514C__15859191_30
 -163C>Ars762551C__8881221_40

CYP2C8805A>Trs11572103C__30634034_10
 792C>Grs1058930C__25761568_20
 416G>Ars11572080C__25625794_10

CYP2C93608C>Trs1799853C__25625805_10
 1003C>Trs28371685C__30634132_70
 42614A>Crs1057910C__27104892_10
 1080C>Grs28371686C__27859817_40

CYP3A4-392A>Grs2740574

CYP3A514690G>Ars10264272C__30203950_10
 6986A>Grs776746C__26201809_30

G6PD202G>Ars1050828C__2228686_20
 376A>Grs1050829C__2228694_20

†Custom assay.

dbSNP: A database of SNP.

Statistical analysis

Allele and genotype frequencies were estimated by gene counting, and haplotype frequencies and linkage disequilibrium were estimated with PHASE 2.1.1 [25]. Deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was assessed by Qui-square tests with Bonferroni correction. The individual proportions of European, African and Amerindian genetic ancestry were estimated using the STRUCTURE software 2.3.3 [26,27]. Analyses of the effect of different genotypes on the efficacy of the treatment were performed using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) to determine the genetic influence in parasitemia or gametocytemia clearance over time. GEE is a repeated measure analysis focused on average changes in response over time and the impact of covariates on these changes. This method models the mean response as a linear function of covariates of interest via a transformation or link function and can be used in studies in which data are asymmetric or the distribution of data is difficult to verify due to small sample size [28]. GEE was performed considering a Gaussian distribution with an identity link function and an exchangeable correlation matrix structure in SPSS18.0 (IBM company) statistical package for Windows® (IL, USA). Parasitemia and gametocytemia levels were log-transformed before analysis because of their asymmetric distribution, but untransformed data are shown in ‘Figures’ and ‘Tables’. Age, gender, co-medication, parasitemia baseline level, gametocytemia baseline level and genetic ancestry entered in models as covariates based on conceptual analyses of the literature and/or by means of a statistical definition (association with the study factor and with the outcome at p ≤ 0.15). Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was performed and corrected p-values were presented. Cohen's d-test was calculated to determine the effect sizes based on standardized differences between the means, that is, the difference between the means of the two conditions in terms of standard (z) scores [29]. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p < 0.05.

Results

After 7 days of treatment all patients presented negative results for parasites and gametocytes in blood. Parasitemia levels were reduced to 0 after 5 days of treatment and gametocytes were reduced to 0 after 4 days of treatment (Figure 1). No patient abandoned treatment and adverse drug reactions were not reported. After treatment, 27 patients (16.5%) presented relapses and repeated the therapeutic regimen.

Number of patients with parasites and gametocytes in blood during the days of chloroquine/primaquine treatment.

G6PD genotypes & phenotypes

Based on G6PD 202G>A and 376A>G SNPs only three malaria patients showed Gd A- deficiency and four women were 202A and 376G carriers. Allele and genotype frequencies for G6PD SNPs are presented in Table 2. Patients with G6PD deficiency did not present adverse reactions to CQ/PQ treatment; therefore, G6PD genotypes were not considered as a confounder variable in this population study.

SNPAlleles, n (%)Genotypes, n (%)
  MaleFemale  
202G>AG105 (98.1)89 (93.0)GG43 (89.6)
 A2 (1.9)7 (7.0)GA3 (6.3)
    AA2 (4.2)

376A>GA94 (88.7)86 (91.5)AA40 (85.1)

 G12 (11.3)8 (8.5)AG6 (12.8)
    GG1 (2.1)

202A + 376G determine A- phenotype.

Influence of CYP in parasitemia & gametocytemia clearance

CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 allele frequencies in the investigated sample are shown in Table 3. The genotype distribution did not deviate significantly from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. A functional approach was used to group genotypes. Therefore, CYP2C8 reduced activity allele carriers were compared with subjects with wild type alleles to explore the effect of these genes on outcomes. After adjustment for age, gender, co-medication, parasitemia baseline level, gametocytemia baseline level, and genetic ancestry in the GEE analysis, only CYP2C8, was associated with gametocytemia clearance rates.

CYP450 allelic frequencies.

GeneAllelesnFrequency (%)
CYP1A2*1A12237.2
 *1C12738.7
 *1F7924.1

CYP2C8*1A28386.3
 *2195.8
 *3216.4
 *451.5

CYP2C9*1A29188.7
 *2237.0
 *392.8
 *1151.5

CYP3A4*1A27282.9
 *1B5617.1

CYP3A5*1A8024.4
 *323671.9
 *6123.7
CYP2C8-reduced activity variants (*2, *3, *4) are low-activity alleles. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients according to metabolism status are shown in Table 4. Figure 2 shows the trajectory of gametocyte elimination based on findings from the GEE model, including treatment over time and the presence of low-activity alleles as main effects, age, gender, co-medication, gametocytemia baseline level and genetic ancestry as covariates (conceptual confounders), and significant interactions between these factors during treatment. A significant effect of CYP2C8*2/*3/*4 alleles (p = 0.01) on treatment was observed and a significant interaction effect between low-activity alleles and treatment over time (p = 0.017) was also observed although after Bonferroni correction it was no longer significant. From baseline to the first day of treatment, homozygous individuals for wild-type CYP2C8 achieved greater reduction (p = 0.007) of gametocytes than individuals without this genotype (Figures 2 & 3). The CYP2C8 polymorphism estimated effect size (0.44) determines a moderate clinical effect considering Cohen's suggestion [30].

CYP2C8 group phenotypes main characteristics.

CharacteristicsCYP2C8*1CYP2C8*2/*3/*4 allele carriersp-value
n11845 

Age (years)36.0 (15.6)35.0 (15.1)0.6

Gender; male (%)68.171.10.4§

Baseline parasitemia (parasites/μl)8374.3 (50–40,000)9222.2 (100–75,000)0.7

Baseline gametocytemia (gametocytes/μl)126.5 (0–4500)73.3 (0–500)0.7

Genetic ancestry:   
– African0.239 (0.10)0.254 (0.10)0.2
– European0.415 (0.10)0.416 (0.13)0.6
– Native American0.345 (0.12)0.329 (0.13)0.5

Values for age and genetic ancestry are expressed as mean (standard deviation).

Values for parasitemia and gametocytemia are expressed as median (range).

†One individual was not included in this analysis due to genotyping failure.

‡Student's t-test.

§Fisher exact test.

¶Mann–Whitney test.

Mean gametocytemia level reduction during chloroquine/primaquine regimen according to

Generalized Estimating Equations method with age, gender, co-medication, gametocytemia baseline level and genetic ancestry as co-variates; p = 0.01 and d = 0.44.

CYP2C9 gene was associated with gametocytemia clearance rates (p = 0.037), but this association was no longer significant after Bonferroni correction (Table 5). No main effect was observed for CYP3A5, but an interaction between gene over time on parasitemia elimination rate during treatment was disclosed (p = 0.007) (Table 5). CYP3A5*3 and *6 carriers showed a lower rate of parasite elimination rate during treatment compared with wild-type carriers. After Bonferroni correction only a trend for these associations was observed, and they were not further explored.

Parasitemia and gametocytemia reduction association with

GeneParasitemiaGametocytemia
 p-valuepBonferronidp-valuepBonferronid
 GeneGene × timeGeneGene × time GeneGene × timeGeneGene × time 
CYP1A20.140.29NSNS 0.200.31NSNS 

CYP2C90.890.08NsNS 0.0370.210.37NS0.24

CYP3A40.790.37NSNS 0.930.90NSNS 

CYP3A50.800.007NS0.070.530.490.77NSNS 

†Effect size Cohen's d-test.

NS: Not significant.

Discussion

Metabolism plays an important role in drug disposition with pharmacological and toxicological implications in the use of therapeutic drugs. CYPs are expressed mostly in the liver representing the most important Phase I drug-metabolizing enzymes that oxidize several endogenous substances and xenobiotics, as most medications [31]. The human CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 genes are mapped to chromosome 10q24 and exhibit similar substrate specificity but with distinct metabolizing rates. CYP2C8 is mainly expressed in the liver and metabolizes near 5% of drugs cleared by Phase I reactions, while CYP2C9, that is also an abundant enzyme expressed in the liver, metabolizes approximately 15% of clinical drugs [32-35]. In the present study, CYP2C8-reduced activity alleles carriers showed lower rates of gametocyte elimination as compared with homozygous wild-type allele *1A. CYP2C8*4 is a missense mutation, which promotes a lower enzyme activity in vitro than the wild-type allele *1A, and similarly CYP2C8*2 and CYP2C8*3 also present a markedly decrease activity in vitro [36,37]. In Africa, CYP2C8*2 and CYP2C8*3 were associated with impaired metabolism of the antimalarial amodiaquine while CYP2C8*4 was not identified [38]. CYP2C9-reduced activity allele carriers also showed a lower gametocytemia clearance rate during treatment period, although not significant after Bonferroni correction. CYP2C9 was not related to CQ or PQ metabolism, however, linkage disequilibrium between CYP2C9 and CYP2C8 alleles was already reported in the admixed Brazilian population where those genes constitute a haplotypic block [39]. Linkage disequilibrium or an overlap of these enzyme functions are possible explanations for the trend observed in CQ/PQ treatment outcome. The lower rate of gametocyte elimination by CYP2C8*2/*3/*4 allele carriers observed herein indicates a slow response to treatment. CQ has a major effect as schizontocides in erythrocytes, but is also effective against P. vivax gametocytes. PQ has major effect as gametocytocide and hypnozoitocide in liver and is not metabolized by those CYPs isoenzymes. Besides CYP2C8 alleles were associated with slow gametocytemia clearance in CQ/PQ-associated regimen, the effect of PQ probably was sufficient to reach an adequate gametocyte clearance for all patients after 4 days of treatment. The synergistic effect of both drugs could prevent an ineffective response to treatment. The present study also reported a trend for a gene over time interaction between lower parasite elimination rates during malaria treatment and CYP3A5 splicing defect alleles (CYP3A5*3 and *6) carriers. Taken together, these results indicate that CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5 genetic variants potentially influence in CQ/PQ malaria treatment and should be better evaluated further in larger studies to prevent ineffective treatment and adverse effects. Antimalarial drugs were usually administered in combination therapies making difficult pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics data interpretation. The present study was performed with patients in normal treatment conditions and differences in age, gender, genetic ancestry and use of other drug together with malaria treatment were taken into account in the analyses. Multiple comparison correction tests and effect size estimates were also performed to address reliable results. Nevertheless, the study has some limitations: it was not possible to infer or control the interindividual immune response variability in malaria patients, which contributes to malaria treatment response; it was not possible to determine if patients were P. vivax-infected with CQ or PQ-resistant strains; however, the patients did not present relapses before 28 days, which is considered a CQ resistance in vivo test [40]; CQ and PQ plasma concentrations were not assessed and CYP genetic variance influence on pharmacokinetics could not be directly correlated; the study design does not allow the investigation of the genetic influence on malaria relapses. Besides these limitations, the present results and their effect size reported reinforce the potential role of pharmacogenomics in P. vivax malaria treatment.

Conclusion

The present study reported for the first time the influence of CYP2C8 gene on gametocyte clearance rate on patients under chloroquine/primaquine malaria treatment. The study also indicates a possible role of CYP2C9 and CYP3A5 in malaria treatment. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clarify the extent of CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP3A5 gene polymorphism influences on CQ/PQ treatment outcome.

Future perspective

Even after all the efforts to develop a multiple drug therapy that has a good response to malaria treatment, this disease still is an important morbidity and mortality factor in several world regions, among them is the Amazonian region. For now, pharmacogenetic studies of this kind of disease are scarce, mainly because of their complexity. However, the present study reports an important contribution to the development of personalized treatment for malaria. †Custom assay. dbSNP: A database of SNP. 202A + 376G determine A- phenotype. Values for age and genetic ancestry are expressed as mean (standard deviation). Values for parasitemia and gametocytemia are expressed as median (range). †One individual was not included in this analysis due to genotyping failure. ‡Student's t-test. §Fisher exact test. ¶Mann–Whitney test. †Effect size Cohen's d-test. NS: Not significant. The WHO recommended as first choice treatment protocol for uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria chloroquine (CQ) and primaquine (PQ) combined therapy, in CQ susceptible areas. CQ and PQ are metabolized by several CYP450 (CYP) isozymes. Therefore, genetic polymorphisms in these metabolizing enzymes might influence P. vivax malaria treatment response. A total of 164 P. vivax malaria patients followed during malaria treatment with CQ and PQ were genotyped for 13 SNPs in CYP450 and G6PD genes. Analyses of the effect of different genotypes on treatment efficacy were performed using generalized estimating equations to determine the genetic influence on parasitemia or gametocytemia clearance over time. From baseline to the first day of treatment, wild-type CYP2C8 homozygous individuals achieved greater reduction of gametocytes than individuals without this genotype. CYP2C9 gene was associated with gametocytemia clearance rates and CYP3A5*3 and *6 carriers showed a lower rate of parasite elimination rate during treatment compared with wild-type carriers. However, only a trend for these associations was observed after Bonferroni correction. Taken together, these results indicate that CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP3A5 genetic variants potentially influence CQ/PQ malaria treatment and should be better evaluated in larger studies to prevent ineffective treatment and adverse effects.
  33 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Assessing individual interethnic admixture and population substructure using a 48-insertion-deletion (INSEL) ancestry-informative marker (AIM) panel.

Authors:  Ney P C Santos; Elzemar M Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Andrea K C Ribeiro-Dos-Santos; Rui Pereira; Leonor Gusmão; António Amorim; Joáo F Guerreiro; Marco A Zago; Cecília Matte; Mara H Hutz; Sidney E B Santos
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 3.  Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 enzymes and its clinical impact.

Authors:  Shu-Feng Zhou; Jun-Ping Liu; Balram Chowbay
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.518

4.  On the question of interindividual variations in chloroquine concentrations.

Authors:  U Hellgren; G Alván; M Jerling
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Clinical importance of the cytochromes P450.

Authors:  Daniel W Nebert; David W Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Chloroquine and desethylchloroquine concentrations in blood cells and plasma from Indian patients infected with sensitive or resistant Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  V K Dua; N C Gupta; P K Kar; J Nand; G Edwards; V P Sharma; S K Subbarao
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  2000-09

7.  Pharmacokinetics of primaquine and carboxyprimaquine in Korean patients with vivax malaria.

Authors:  Yang-Ree Kim; Hyo-Jeong Kuh; Mi-Young Kim; Yo-Sook Kim; Woo-Chul Chung; Sang-Il Kim; Moon-Won Kang
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.946

8.  Amodiaquine metabolism is impaired by common polymorphisms in CYP2C8: implications for malaria treatment in Africa.

Authors:  S Parikh; J-B Ouedraogo; J A Goldstein; P J Rosenthal; D L Kroetz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Identification of human cytochrome P(450)s that metabolise anti-parasitic drugs and predictions of in vivo drug hepatic clearance from in vitro data.

Authors:  Xue-Qing Li; Anders Björkman; Tommy B Andersson; Lars L Gustafsson; Collen M Masimirembwa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Cytochrome P4502C9: an enzyme of major importance in human drug metabolism.

Authors:  J O Miners; D J Birkett
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics of COVID-19 therapies.

Authors:  Takuto Takahashi; Jasmine A Luzum; Melanie R Nicol; Pamala A Jacobson
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 8.617

Review 2.  A Review of Pharmacogenetics of Antimalarials and Associated Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Hazem Elewa; Kyle John Wilby
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 3.  Repurposing Drugs for COVID-19: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenomics of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine.

Authors:  Mariana Babayeva; Zvi Loewy
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2020-10-23

4.  Influence of CYP2C8, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 Host Genotypes on Early Recurrence of Plasmodium vivax.

Authors:  Anne C G Almeida; Maria C B Puça; Erick F G Figueiredo; Laila R Barbosa; Yanka E A R Salazar; Emanuelle L Silva; Marcelo A M Brito; André M Siqueira; José L F Vieira; Marcus V G Lacerda; Wuelton M Monteiro; Gisely C Melo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  CYP2D6 activity and the risk of recurrence of Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Brazilian Amazon: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Larissa W Brasil; Fernanda Rodrigues-Soares; Ana B Santoro; Anne C G Almeida; Andrea Kühn; Rajendranath Ramasawmy; Marcus V G Lacerda; Wuelton M Monteiro; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  SLCO1A2, SLCO1B1 and SLCO2B1 polymorphisms influences chloroquine and primaquine treatment in Plasmodium vivax malaria.

Authors:  Vinicius A Sortica; Juliana D Lindenau; Maristela G Cunha; Maria Deise O Ohnishi; Ana Maria R Ventura; Ândrea Kc Ribeiro-Dos-Santos; Sidney Eb Santos; Luciano Sp Guimarães; Mara H Hutz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 7.  Pharmacogenomics of COVID-19 therapies.

Authors:  Takuto Takahashi; Jasmine A Luzum; Melanie R Nicol; Pamala A Jacobson
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 8.617

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics Approach for the Improvement of COVID-19 Treatment.

Authors:  Ingrid Fricke-Galindo; Ramcés Falfán-Valencia
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 9.  Important Pharmacogenetic Information for Drugs Prescribed During the SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19).

Authors:  Pablo Zubiaur; Dora Koller; Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez; Marcos Navares-Gómez; Francisco Abad-Santos
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 10.  Pharmacogenomics of genetic polymorphism within the genes responsible for SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility and the drug-metabolising genes used in treatment.

Authors:  Laith N Al-Eitan; Saif Z Alahmad
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.