Literature DB >> 27767216

Systematic review for surgical treatment of adult and adolescent laryngotracheal stenosis.

Sean Lewis1, Marisa Earley1, Richard Rosenfeld1, Joshua Silverman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine if open surgical treatment options for adult and adolescent laryngotracheal stenosis are more successful than endoscopic procedures. STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review.
METHODS: Embase and MEDLINE were searched for publications on adult and adolescent patients (>13 years old) with laryngotracheal stenosis. Cause of stenosis (intubation, idiopathic, or trauma) and treatments (open laryngotracheal resection with anastomosis, open laryngotracheal reconstruction with expansion grafting, or endoscopic procedures) were included. Primary outcomes are decreased additional surgery performed and success of decannulation, if previously tracheostomy.
RESULTS: There were 297 abstracts reviewed, 104 articles selected for full-text review, and 39 articles, with 834 pooled patients, included in the analysis. Patients who had an open procedure (resection with anastomosis or reconstruction with expansion grafting) had significantly different outcomes rates; 32% versus 38% (P <.001) received additional surgery and 89%and 83% (P <.001) were decannulated, respectively. For patients who had endoscopic repair, 44% received additional surgery, and 63% were decannulated. Patients with idiopathic stenosis were more likely to receive additional surgery than those with traumatic (54% vs. 25%) and intubation/tracheostomy etiologies (54% vs. 35%). Etiology of stenosis did affect decannulation rates, patients with intubation/tracheostomy etiology had decannulation rates of 88%, compared to traumatic etiologies (78%, P <.001) and idiopathic stenosis (63%, P <.001). Risk of bias did not impact study results and was assessed using a validated instrument, Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with adult laryngotracheal stenosis who undergo laryngotracheal resection with anastomosis receive less surgery compared to those who undergo endoscopic treatment or laryngotracheal reconstruction with augmentation/grafting. Patients with idiopathic stenosis are less likely to receive further surgery compared to those from trauma or intubation/tracheostomy, but have the lowest rate of decannulation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 127:191-198, 2017.
© 2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngotracheal stenosis; laryngotracheal reconstruction; subglottic stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27767216     DOI: 10.1002/lary.26151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  14 in total

1.  Association Between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Outcomes of Open Airway Reconstruction Surgery in Adults.

Authors:  Deborah X Xie; Saad C Rehman; David O Francis; James L Netterville; C Gaelyn Garrett; Alexander Gelbard; Brittany Lipscomb; Christopher T Wootten
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Our Experience with Laryngotracheal Trauma (LTT) in a Tertiary Care Centre of Western Rajasthan.

Authors:  Neha Shakrawal; Sourabha K Patro; Kapil Soni; Darwin Kaushal; Bikram Choudhury; Amit Goyal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-09-01

3.  Tracheal and laryngotracheal resections and reconstructions-a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Felipe Marchant; Antti Mäkitie; Jarmo Salo; Jari Räsänen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.005

4.  Health Care Costs and Cost-effectiveness in Laryngotracheal Stenosis.

Authors:  Linda X Yin; William V Padula; Shekhar Gadkaree; Kevin Motz; Sabrina Rahman; Zachary Predmore; Alexander Gelbard; Alexander T Hillel
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Tracheal Stenosis: Evaluation of an Institutional Protocol and Introduction of Novel Surgical Criteria and Scoring System.

Authors:  S K Singh; Tarun Sood; K Sabarigirish; Himanshu Swami; Ravi Roy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-04

6.  Functional outcome after (laryngo)tracheal resection and reconstruction for acquired benign (laryngo)tracheal stenosis.

Authors:  Simone T Timman; Christiana Schoemaker; Wilson W L Li; Henri A M Marres; Jimmie Honings; Wim J Morshuis; Erik H F M van der Heijden; Ad F T M Verhagen
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-03

7.  Establishment of an immortalized human subglottic epithelial cell line.

Authors:  Jason Powell; Bernard Verdon; Janet A Wilson; A John Simpson; Jeffery Pearson; Chris Ward
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.970

8.  Comparison of tracheal resection outcomes at a university hospital vs county hospital setting.

Authors:  Michael S Chow; Leonard Haller; Tamara Chambers; Lindsay Reder; Karla O'Dell
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-08

9.  Effects of topical mitomycin-C on the tracheal epithelia of rabbits following tracheostomy

Authors:  Saniye Göknil Çalık; Mustafa Çalık; Zümrüt Ela Arslan Kaşdoğan; Mustafa Cihat Avunduk; Olgun Kadir Arıbaş; Hidir Esme
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 0.973

Review 10.  Functional evaluation before and after laryngo-tracheal resection.

Authors:  Nina Rahimi; Imme Roesner; Thomas Schweiger; Matthias Evermann; Doris-Maria Denk-Linnert; Walter Klepetko; Konrad Hoetzenecker
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.