Literature DB >> 27766413

Conversions in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Martijn H G M van der Pas1, Charlotte L Deijen2, Gabor S A Abis2, Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk2, Eva Haglind3, Alois Fürst4, Antonio M Lacy5, Miguel A Cuesta2, Hendrik J Bonjer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery offers patients with rectal cancer short-term benefits and similar survival rates as open surgery. However, selecting patients who are suitable candidates for laparoscopic surgery is essential to prevent intra-operative conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Clinical and pathological variables were studied among patients who had converted laparoscopic surgeries within the COLOR II trial to improve patient selection for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: Between January 20, 2004, and May 4, 2010, 1044 patients with rectal cancer enrolled in the COLOR II trial and were randomized to either laparoscopic or open surgery. Of 693 patients who had laparoscopic surgery, 114 (16 %) were converted to open surgery. Predictive factors were studied using multivariate analyses, and morbidity and mortality rates were determined.
RESULTS: Factors correlating with conversion were as follows: age above 65 years (OR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.0: p = 0.003), BMI greater than 25 (OR 2.7; 95 % CI 1.7-4.3: p < 0.001), and tumor location more than 5 cm from the anal verge (OR 0.5; CI 0.3-0.9). Gender was not significantly related to conversion (p = 0.14). In the converted group, blood loss was greater (p < 0.001) and operating time was longer (p = 0.028) compared with the non-converted laparoscopies. Hospital stay did not differ (p = 0.06). Converted procedures were followed by more postoperative complications compared with laparoscopic or open surgery (p = 0.041 and p = 0.042, respectively). Mortality was similar in the laparoscopic and converted groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Age above 65 years, BMI greater than 25, and tumor location between 5 and 15 cm from the anal verge were risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion; Laparoscopic surgery; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27766413     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5228-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population.

Authors:  Katherine Grailey; Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Rima Aboud; Paul Ziprin; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance.

Authors:  Patricia Sylla; David W Rattner; Salvadora Delgado; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Meiki Fukuda; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Satoshi Miyata; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Buunen; H J Bonjer; W C J Hop; E Haglind; G Kurlberg; J Rosenberg; A M Lacy; M A Cuesta; A D'Hoore; A Fürst; J F Lange; P Jess; O Bulut; P Poornoroozy; K Juul Jensen; M Mark Christensen; E Lundhus; H Ovesen; D Birch; I Iesalnieks; C Jäger; M Kreis; Y van riet; E van der Harst; M F Gerhards; W A Bemelman; B M E Hansson; P A Neijenhuis; H A Prins; C Balague; E Targarona; J A Luján Mompeán; J D Franco Osorio; F J Garcia Molina; S Skullman; Z Läckberg; U Kressner; P Matthiessen; S H Kim; A Alfredo Poza
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  2009-05

9.  Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome.

Authors:  A Agha; A Fürst; I Iesalnieks; S Fichtner-Feigl; N Ghali; D Krenz; M Anthuber; K W Jauch; P Piso; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  7 in total

1.  Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  T W A Koedam; M Veltcamp Helbach; P M van de Ven; Ph M Kruyt; N T van Heek; H J Bonjer; J B Tuynman; C Sietses
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Unplanned Robotic-Assisted Conversion-to-Open Colorectal Surgery is Associated with Adverse Outcomes.

Authors:  Yongjin F Lee; Jeremy Albright; Warqaa M Akram; Juan Wu; Jane Ferraro; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  A systematic review of the literature assessing operative blood loss and postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Maria Charalambides; Athina Mavrou; Thomas Jennings; Michael P Powar; James Wheeler; R Justin Davies; Nicola S Fearnhead; Constantinos Simillis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Transanal total mesorectal excision: how are we doing so far?

Authors:  C L Sparreboom; N Komen; D Rizopoulos; H L van Westreenen; P G Doornebosch; J W T Dekker; A G Menon; J B Tuynman; F Daams; D Lips; W M U van Grevenstein; T M Karsten; J F Lange; A D'Hoore; A M Wolthuis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Available prediction scores of conversion for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery seem to be unsuitable for nowadays rectal cancer management.

Authors:  Hamza Sekkat; Amine Souadka; Lise Courtot; Ali Rafik; Laila Amrani; Amine Benkabbou; Pierre Peyrafort; Urs Giger-Pabst; Elias Karam; Raouf Mohsine; Anass M Majbar; Mehdi Ouaissi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?

Authors:  Michael P M de Neree Tot Babberich; Julia T van Groningen; Evelien Dekker; Theo Wiggers; Michel W J M Wouters; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Major colorectal resection is feasible using a new robotic surgical platform: the first report of a case series.

Authors:  F Dixon; R O'Hara; N Ghuman; J Strachan; A Khanna; B D Keeler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.