Literature DB >> 2776632

Electrophysiology and perimetry in acute retrobulbar neuritis.

T A Berninger1, W Heider.   

Abstract

Eighteen patients with acute retrobulbar neuritis were examined by visual field analysis and electroophthalmological recordings. The visual fields were measured to 30 degrees with the automatic perimeter Octopus 201. The pattern-evoked cortical potential showed an increased P-100 latency followed by a decrease in 12 patients during the first two weeks of the disease. This latency change cannot be explained by remyelinization. Teh positive component of the pattern ERG (P-50) was reduced in all acutely affected eyes in comparison with the fellow eye. During recovery, the amplitude of the positive PERG component increased to normal, but remained slightly reduced in comparison with the response from the fellow eyes. Thirteen patients out of 18 were clinically and electrophysiologically diagnosed as having unilateral retrobulbar neuritis. However, static perimetry showed paracentral scotomas in the fellow eye in 5 cases. Recovery of the severely affected eye was accompanied by complete normalization of the visual field in the fellow eye. Thus static perimetry seems to be a more sensitive test than even the visual evoked potentials for detecting lesions in the visual pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2776632     DOI: 10.1007/BF00170978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  18 in total

1.  A gold foil electrode: extending the horizons for clinical electroretinography.

Authors:  G B Arden; R M Carter; C Hogg; I M Siegel; S Margolis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The effects of image degradation on retinal illuminance and pattern responses to checkerboard stimuli.

Authors:  N Drasdo; W Cox; D A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

5.  Acute optic neuritis: prognosis for development of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W G Bradley; C W Whitty
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  [Glaucomatous visual fields--analysis of octopus observations with statistical material (author's transl)].

Authors:  B Gloor; U Schmied; A Fässler
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 0.700

7.  The ERG in response to alternating gratings in patients with diseases of the peripheral visual pathway.

Authors:  A Fiorentini; L Maffei; M Pirchio; D Spinelli; V Porciatti
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Simultaneous pattern-reversal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in diseases of the macula and optic nerve.

Authors:  J Sherman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Pattern ERGs and visual evoked potentials in maculopathies and optic nerve diseases.

Authors:  G G Celesia; D Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The pattern evoked electroretinogram in optic neuritis. A combined psychophysical and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  G T Plant; R F Hess; S J Thomas
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pattern electroretinogram as a function of spatial frequency after retrobulbar optic neuritis.

Authors:  B Falsini; A Bardocci; S Cermola; V Porciatti; G Porrello
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pattern electroretinograms in optic neuritis during the acute stage and after remission.

Authors:  T A Berninger; W Heider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Focal macular photopic negative response in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  H Nakamura; K Miyamoto; S Yokota; K Ogino; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.