B Vaseghi1, M Zoghi2, S Jaberzadeh3. 1. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: bita.vaseghi@monash.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) on sensory (STh) and pain thresholds (PTh) in healthy individuals and pain levels (PL) in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for a-tDCS studies. Methodological quality was examined using the PEDro and Downs and Black (D&B) assessment tools. RESULTS: a-tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) increases both STh (P<0.005, with the effect size of 22.19%) and PTh (P<0.001, effect size of 19.28%). In addition, STh was increased by a-tDCS of the primary sensory cortex (S1) (P<0.05 with an effect size of 4.34). Likewise, PL decreased significantly in the patient group following application of a-tDCS to both the M1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The average decrease in visual analogue score was 14.9% and 19.3% after applying a-tDCS on the M1 and DLPFC. Moreover, meta-analysis showed that in all subgroups (except a-tDCS of S1) active a-tDCS and sham stimulation produced significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence for the effectiveness of a-tDCS in increasing STh/PTh in healthy group and decreasing PL in patients. However, due to small sample sizes in the included studies, our results should be interpreted cautiously. Given the level of blinding did not considered in inclusion criteria, the result of current study should be interpreted with caution. SIGNIFICANCE: Site of stimulation should have a differential effect over pain relief.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) on sensory (STh) and pain thresholds (PTh) in healthy individuals and pain levels (PL) in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for a-tDCS studies. Methodological quality was examined using the PEDro and Downs and Black (D&B) assessment tools. RESULTS: a-tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) increases both STh (P<0.005, with the effect size of 22.19%) and PTh (P<0.001, effect size of 19.28%). In addition, STh was increased by a-tDCS of the primary sensory cortex (S1) (P<0.05 with an effect size of 4.34). Likewise, PL decreased significantly in the patient group following application of a-tDCS to both the M1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The average decrease in visual analogue score was 14.9% and 19.3% after applying a-tDCS on the M1 and DLPFC. Moreover, meta-analysis showed that in all subgroups (except a-tDCS of S1) active a-tDCS and sham stimulation produced significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence for the effectiveness of a-tDCS in increasing STh/PTh in healthy group and decreasing PL in patients. However, due to small sample sizes in the included studies, our results should be interpreted cautiously. Given the level of blinding did not considered in inclusion criteria, the result of current study should be interpreted with caution. SIGNIFICANCE: Site of stimulation should have a differential effect over pain relief.
Authors: F Fregni; M A Nitsche; C K Loo; A R Brunoni; P Marangolo; J Leite; S Carvalho; N Bolognini; W Caumo; N J Paik; M Simis; K Ueda; H Ekhitari; P Luu; D M Tucker; W J Tyler; J Brunelin; A Datta; C H Juan; G Venkatasubramanian; P S Boggio; M Bikson Journal: Clin Res Regul Aff Date: 2015-03-01
Authors: Timothy Y Mariano; Mascha Van't Wout; Sarah L Garnaat; Steven A Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg Journal: Pain Med Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Fuad Ahmad Hazime; Ronaldo Alves da Cunha; Renato Rozenblit Soliaman; Ana Clara Bezerra Romancini; Alberto de Castro Pochini; Benno Ejnisman; Abrahão Fontes Baptista Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2017-06
Authors: Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Piero F Mejia-Pando; Maria A Luna-Cuadros; Judah L Barouh; Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros; Ludmilla Candido-Santos; Alice Barra; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni Journal: Pain Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Leigh E Charvet; Margaret Kasschau; Abhishek Datta; Helena Knotkova; Michael C Stevens; Angelo Alonzo; Colleen Loo; Kevin R Krull; Marom Bikson Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2015-03-17
Authors: Nádia Regina Jardim da Silva; Gabriela Laste; Alícia Deitos; Luciana Cadore Stefani; Gustavo Cambraia-Canto; Iraci L S Torres; Andre R Brunoni; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Laura Flix-Díez; Miguel Delicado-Miralles; Francisco Gurdiel-Álvarez; Enrique Velasco; María Galán-Calle; Sergio Lerma Lara Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-05-25