Literature DB >> 27765302

Impact of Operator Experience and Volume on Outcomes After Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Bo Xu1, Björn Redfors2, Yuejin Yang3, Shubin Qiao1, Yongjian Wu1, Jilin Chen1, Haibo Liu1, Jue Chen1, Liang Xu1, Yanyan Zhao1, Changdong Guan1, Runlin Gao4, Philippe Généreux5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of operator experience on prognosis after left main coronary artery (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: LM PCI can be technically challenging and potentially risky considering the amount of supplied myocardium.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent unprotected LM PCI at a single institution were included and compared according to whether the primary operator was an experienced, high-volume LM operator (defined as an operator who performed at least 15 LM PCIs per year for at least 3 consecutive years) or not. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models are presented.
RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2011, a total of 1,948 patients underwent unprotected LM PCI by 25 operators. Of these, 7 operators (28%) were considered experienced, and 18 (72%) were considered less experienced, with an overall mean experience of 12.0 ± 11.5 LM PCIs per year. LM PCI was performed in 1,422 patients (73%) by experienced operators and in 526 patients (27%) by less experienced operators. Patients treated by experienced operators had more complex and extensive coronary artery disease. Unadjusted and adjusted risks for cardiac death were lower for patients who were treated by experienced operators, both at 30-day (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 to 0.60; p = 0.003; adjusted HR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.59; p = 0.003) and 3-year (unadjusted HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.89, p = 0.02; adjusted HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.84; p = 0.009) follow-up. Discrimination improved when operator experience was added to Cox proportional hazards models containing the SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (integrated discriminatory index = 0.004, p = 0.03) or SYNTAX score II (integrated discriminatory index = 0.007, p = 0.02). No significant interaction was detected between operator experience and distal bifurcation LM lesion, 2-stent bifurcation stenting, and intravascular ultrasound use (p > 0.10 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent LM PCI by high-volume and experienced operators had better short- and long-term prognoses. Operator experience is an important factor in a complex intervention such as LM PCI.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SYNTAX score; left main coronary artery; quality of care; stents

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27765302     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  16 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of left main crossover stenting for ostial left anterior descending artery acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kei Yamamoto; Kenichi Sakakura; Naoyuki Akashi; Yusuke Watanabe; Masamitsu Noguchi; Yousuke Taniguchi; Hiroshi Wada; Shin-Ichi Momomura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Authors:  Birgit Vogel; Shamir R Mehta; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Arun Kanmanthareddy; Dixitha Anugula; Biswajit Kar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Towards a common pathway for the treatment of left main disease: contemporary evidence and future directions: Left main disease treatment.

Authors:  Dejan Milasinovic; Goran Stankovic
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2021-12

5.  Impact of Operator Volumes and Experience on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.

Authors:  Christopher P Kovach; Colin I O'Donnell; Stanley Swat; Jacob A Doll; Mary E Plomondon; Richard Schofield; Javier A Valle; Stephen W Waldo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2021-11-06

Review 6.  Therapeutic Options for Left Main, Left Main Equivalent, and Three-Vessel Disease.

Authors:  James J Glazier; Bayoan Ramos-Parra; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-12

7.  Stent and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Comparisons in the Setting of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: Can the Operator Experience Affect the Study Results?

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Dik Heg; Fabrizio Ferrari; Gianfranco Percoco; Gianluca Campo; Carlo Tumscitz; Federico Colombo; Andrea Zuffi; Fausto Castriota; Alberto Cremonesi; Stephan Windecker; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent-PCI for unprotected left main disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Salvatore De Rosa; Alberto Polimeni; Jolanda Sabatino; Ciro Indolfi
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Who Would You Want to Do Your Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

Authors:  Marwan Saad; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus cardiac bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Yicong Ye; Ming Yang; Shuyang Zhang; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.