| Literature DB >> 27764910 |
Young Gyung Shin1, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Min Jung Kim1, Jung Hyun Yoon1, Hee Jung Moon1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical and pathological characteristics of pure mucinous breast carcinoma (PMBC) according to internal echogenicity on ultrasonography (US).Entities:
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma, mucinous; Breast neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasonography
Year: 2016 PMID: 27764910 PMCID: PMC5381847 DOI: 10.14366/usg.16028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrasonography ISSN: 2288-5919
Imaging characteristics of mucinous carcinoma according to echogenicity on ultrasonography
| US echogenicity | Total | Hypoechogenic (n=11) | Isoechogenic to hyperechogenic (n=22) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (range, yr) | 47 (31-79) | 58 (38-79) | 46 (31-69) | 0.069 |
| Symptom | >0.990 | |||
| Negative | 10 (30.3) | 3 (27.3) | 7 (31.8) | |
| Palpable | 23 (69.7) | 8 (72.7) | 15 (68.2) | |
| Mammographic density[ | 0.121 | |||
| A, B | 9 (27.3) | 5 (45.5) | 4 (18.2) | |
| C, D | 24 (72.7) | 6 (54.5) | 18 (81.8) | |
| MR imaging features | ||||
| Lesion size, median (range, mm) | 17 (5-37) | 16 (8-34) | 18 (5-37) | 0.849 |
| Signal intensity on T2-weighted images | 0.010 | |||
| Isointense | 6 (18.2) | 5 (45.5) | 1 (4.5) | |
| High | 27 (81.8) | 6 (54.5) | 21 (95.5) | 0.097 |
| Signal intensity on STIR T2-weighted images | ||||
| Isointense | 4 (12.1) | 3 (27.3) | 1 (4.5) | |
| High | 29 (87.9) | 8 (72.7) | 21 (95.5) | 0.219 |
| Internal enhancement | ||||
| Low | 3 (9.1) | 0 | 3 (13.6) | |
| Isoenhancement | 18 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) | 13 (59.1) | |
| High | 12 (36.4) | 6 (54.5) | 6 (27.3) | |
| Early enhancement | 0.593[ | |||
| Medium | 4 (12.5) | 2 (18.2) | 2 (9.5) | |
| Rapid | 28 (87.5) | 9 (81.8) | 19 (90.5) | |
| Delay enhancement | 0.053[ | |||
| Persistent or plateau | 20 (62.5) | 4 (36.4) | 16 (76.2) | |
| Washout | 12 (37.5) | 7 (63.6) | 5 (23.8) | |
| Peak enhancement, median (range, %) | - | 203 (84-376) | 215 (66-549) | 0.166 |
| ADC value, mean (range) | - | 1.90 (1.59-1.95) | 1.92 (1.17-2.44) | 0.133 |
Values are presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated.
US, ultrasonography; MR, magnetic resonance; STIR, short tau inversion recovery; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.
A, almost entirely fatty; B, scattered fibroglandular tissue; C, heterogeneously dense; D, extremely dense.
The analysis excluded one case without enhancement.
Fig. 1.A 75-year-old woman confirmed to have pure mucinous carcinoma of the right breast.
A. Ultrasonography of the area with a palpable lump in the right breast shows a 13-mm hypoechoic mass. B, C. The mass shows isointensity on T2-weighted images (arrow, B) and high internal enhancement on the second subtraction images (arrow, C). D. A low-power view visualizes the large lakes of extracellular mucin and clusters of tumor cells (H&E, ×10).
Fig. 2.A 44-year-old woman confirmed to have pure mucinous carcinoma of the left breast.
A. Ultrasonography of the area with a palpable lump in the left breast shows a 27-mm hyperechoic mass. B, C. The mass shows high signal intensity on T2-weighted images (arrow, B) and no internal enhancement on the second subtraction images (arrowheads, C). D. A low-power view visualizes small islands of tumor cells within lakes of extracellular mucin (H&E, ×100).
Histopathologic characteristics of mucinous carcinoma according to echogenicity on US
| US echogenicity | Total | Hypoechogenic (n=11) | Isoechogenic to hyperechogenic (n=22) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesion size (mm) | 20 (3-40) | 20 (3-38) | 19 (8-40) | 0.778 |
| Margin | >0.990 | |||
| Expanding | 22 (66.7) | 7 (63.6) | 15 (68.2) | |
| Infiltrative | 11 (33.3) | 4 (36.4) | 7 (31.8) | |
| Nuclear grade | 0.538 | |||
| 1 | 16 (48.5) | 4 (36.4) | 12 (54.5) | |
| 2 | 17 (51.5) | 7 (63.6) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Histologic grade | 0.121 | |||
| 1 | 24 (72.7) | 6 (54.5) | 18 (81.8) | |
| 2 | 9 (27.3) | 5 (45.5) | 4 (18.2) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| Absence | 33 (100) | 11 (100) | 22 (100) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | >0.990 | |||
| Absence | 31 (93.9) | 10 (90.9) | 21 (95.5) | |
| Presence | 2 (6.1) | 1 (9.1) | 1 (4.5) | |
| ER | ||||
| Positive | 33 (100) | 11 (100) | 22 (100) | |
| PR | 0.304 | |||
| Positive | 28 (84.8) | 8 (72.7) | 20 (90.9) | |
| Negative | 5 (15.2) | 3 (27.3) | 2 (9.1) | |
| HER2[ | 0.312 | |||
| Positive | 1 (3.1) | 1 (10) | 0 | |
| Negative | 31 (96.9) | 9 (90) | 22 (100) | |
| Ki-67[ | ||||
| Median (range) | 5 (1-20) | 7 (2-20) | 5 (1-20) | 0.606 |
| Positive (≥14%) | 5 (15.6) | 3 (27.3) | 2 (9.5) | 0.310 |
| Negative (<14%) | 27 (84.4) | 8 (72.7) | 19 (90.5) |
Values are presented as median (range) or number (%).
US, ultrasonography; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
The analysis excluded one case with hypoechogenicity that had a 2+ HER2 immunohistochemistry result, but for which an additional silver-enhanced in situ hybridization analysis was not performed.
The analysis excluded one case with hyperechogenicity for which a Ki-67 assay was not performed.