Literature DB >> 27762608

Official Executive Summary of an American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults.

Gregory A Schmidt, Timothy D Girard, John P Kress, Peter E Morris, Daniel R Ouellette, Waleed Alhazzani, Suzanne M Burns, Scott K Epstein, Andres Esteban, Eddy Fan, Miguel Ferrer, Gilles L Fraser, Michelle Ng Gong, Catherine L Hough, Sangeeta Mehta, Rahul Nanchal, Sheena Patel, Amy J Pawlik, William D Schweickert, Curtis N Sessler, Thomas Strøm, Kevin C Wilson, Jonathon D Truwit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This clinical practice guideline addresses six questions related to liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults. It is the result of a collaborative effort between the American Thoracic Society and the American College of Chest Physicians.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel posed six clinical questions in a Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes format. A comprehensive literature search and evidence synthesis was performed for each question, which included appraising the certainty in the evidence (i.e., the quality of evidence) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The Evidence-to-Decision framework was applied to each question, requiring the panel to evaluate and weigh the importance of the problem, the confidence in the evidence, the certainty about how much the public values the main outcomes, the magnitude and balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes, the resources and costs associated with the intervention, the impact on health disparities, and the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.
RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations were formulated and graded initially by subcommittees and then modified after full-panel discussions. The recommendations were confirmed by confidential electronic voting; approval required that at least 80% of the panel members agree with the recommendation.
CONCLUSIONS: The panel provides recommendations regarding liberation from mechanical ventilation. The details regarding the evidence and rationale for each recommendation are presented in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Chest.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27762608     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2076ST

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  30 in total

1.  A Comparative Analysis of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Guideline Development Methodologies.

Authors:  Noah C Schoenberg; Alan F Barker; John Bernardo; Robin R Deterding; Jerrold J Ellner; Dean R Hess; Neil R MacIntyre; Fernando J Martinez; Kevin C Wilson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Limiting sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - time to wake up.

Authors:  Faraaz Ali Shah; Timothy D Girard; Sachin Yende
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  Provider Perspectives on Preventive Postextubation Noninvasive Ventilation for High-Risk Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Erin A Nuzzo; Jeremy M Kahn; Timothy D Girard
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-02

4.  Generation of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Model in Mice by Repeated Ozone Exposure.

Authors:  Zhongwei Sun; Feng Li; Xin Zhou; Wen Wang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  The PROMIZING trial enrollment algorithm for early identification of patients ready for unassisted breathing.

Authors:  Laurent Brochard; Karen J Bosma; Clement Brault; Jordi Mancebo; Juan-Carlos Suarez Montero; Tracey Bentall; Karen E A Burns; Thomas Piraino; François Lellouche; Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard; Emmanuel Charbonney; Guillaume Carteaux; Tommaso Maraffi; Gaëtan Beduneau; Alain Mercat; Yoanna Skrobik; Fei Zuo; Myriam Lafreniere-Roula; Kevin Thorpe
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 6.  Stem cell therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current status of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhongwei Sun; Feng Li; Xin Zhou; Kian Fan Chung; Wen Wang; Jialun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Economic variations in patterns of care and outcomes of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in China: a national cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Zhiwei Gao; Yi Yang; Maoqin Li; Xinwei Mu; Xiaochun Ma; Guicheng Li; Wen Sun; Xue Wang; Qin Gu; Ruiqiang Zheng; Hongsheng Zhao; Jianfeng Xie; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Using twitch tracheal airway pressure, negative inhale forced pressure, and Medical Research Council score to guide weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Qi Qing; Minyong Liang; Qingwen Sun; Bifang Xie; Chun Yang; Weibo Liang; Weiqun He; Xiaoqing Liu; Yimin Li; Rongchang Chen; Yuanda Xu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Critically Ill Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in New Orleans and Care With an Evidence-Based Protocol.

Authors:  David R Janz; Scott Mackey; Nirav Patel; Beau P Saccoccia; Michelle St Romain; Bethany Busack; Hayoung Lee; Lana Phan; Jordan Vaughn; David Feinswog; Ryan Chan; Lauren Auerbach; Nicholas Sausen; Joseph Grace; Marian Sackey; Anushka Das; Angellica O Gordon; Jennifer Schwehm; Robin McGoey; Kyle I Happel; Stephen P Kantrow
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) during spontaneous breathing trials in critically ill patients: a crossover trial.

Authors:  Juliana C Ferreira; Fabia Diniz-Silva; Henrique T Moriya; Adriano M Alencar; Marcelo B P Amato; Carlos R R Carvalho
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.