Literature DB >> 27762605

Variation in Attenuation in L1 Trabecular Bone at Different Tube Voltages: Caution Is Warranted When Screening for Osteoporosis With the Use of Opportunistic CT.

Hillary W Garner1, Michelle M Paturzo2, Gabriela Gaudier3, Perry J Pickhardt4, Daniel E Wessell1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the variation in attenuation values (expressed as Hounsfield units) for L1 vertebral body trabecular bone at different tube voltages used in dual-energy CT (DECT) and to remind physicians to consider changes in attenuation values when they approach opportunistic screening for osteoporosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent DECT examination of the abdomen and pelvis for suspected urolithiasis were included in the study. Attenuation noted on CT of the L1 trabecular bone performed with the use of tube voltages of 80, 100, and 140 kV was recorded. The correlation between the attenuation noted when the tube voltage was 140 kV and the attenuation noted when the tube voltage was either 80 or 100 kV was calculated, and differences in the mean CT attenuation values were compared.
RESULTS: The mean attenuation values from L1 trabecular bone measurement performed for 191 patients were analyzed. As expected, the mean attenuation values decreased as the tube voltage increased. There was a strong correlation between the attenuation values noted when tube voltages of 80 and 140 kV were used (r2 = 0.97) and those noted when 100 and 140 kV were used (r2 = 0.96). The mean attenuation value noted at 80 kV was 76.4 HU (65%) higher than that noted at 140 kV (p < 0.001). The mean attenuation value at 100 kV was 45.5 HU (39.9%) higher than that noted at 140 kV (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: We confirmed that attenuation values of L1 trabecular bone, unlike attenuation values of fat, fluid, or soft tissue, vary at different CT x-ray tube voltages. Therefore, standard reference attenuation values for trabecular bone seen at 120 kV cannot be applied to other single-energy settings, DECT, or CT examinations where dose modulation software automatically raises or lowers the tube voltage from 120 kV. Knowledge of the specific energy spectra used is essential before performing opportunistic CT evaluation for osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Hounsfield unit; osteoporosis; trabecular bone; tube voltage

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27762605     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  Phantomless calibration of CT scans for measurement of BMD and bone strength-Inter-operator reanalysis precision.

Authors:  David C Lee; Paul F Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Future Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Related to Lumbar Vertebral Trabecular Attenuation Measured at Routine Body CT.

Authors:  Scott J Lee; Peter M Graffy; Ryan D Zea; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis Using Computed Tomography: State of the Art and Argument for Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Ashley A Weaver; Robert J Ward; John M Boone; Robert D Boutin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Biomechanical performance of bicortical versus pericortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screws.

Authors:  José M Spirig; Elin Winkler; Jonas Widmer; Mazda Farshad; Frédéric Cornaz; Marie-Rosa Fasser; Michael Betz; Jess G Snedeker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sex differences in pericardial adipose tissue assessed by PET/CT and association with cardiometabolic risk.

Authors:  Corey M Gill; Debora C Azevedo; Adriana L Oliveira; Edgar L Martinez-Salazar; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 6.  X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine.

Authors:  M T Löffler; N Sollmann; K Mei; A Valentinitsch; P B Noël; J S Kirschke; T Baum
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening at Routine Abdominal and Thoracic CT: Normative L1 Trabecular Attenuation Values in More than 20 000 Adults.

Authors:  Samuel Jang; Peter M Graffy; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Scott J Lee; Ronald M Summers; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Improved CT-based Osteoporosis Assessment with a Fully Automated Deep Learning Tool.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Thang Nguyen; Alberto A Perez; Peter M Graffy; Samuel Jang; Ronald M Summers; John W Garrett
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 9.  Value-added Opportunistic CT Screening: State of the Art.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 29.146

10.  Effects of intra-articular corticosteroid injections on lumbar trabecular density.

Authors:  Jonathon Florance; Robert Hemke; Connie Y Chang; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.