Literature DB >> 27761545

Stiffness of pancreatic cancer cells is associated with increased invasive potential.

Angelyn V Nguyen1, Kendra D Nyberg2, Michael B Scott1, Alia M Welsh3, Andrew H Nguyen4, Nanping Wu4, Sophia V Hohlbauch5, Nicholas A Geisse5, Ewan A Gibb6, A Gordon Robertson6, Timothy R Donahue7, Amy C Rowat8.   

Abstract

Metastasis is a fundamentally physical process in which cells are required to deform through narrow gaps as they invade surrounding tissues and transit to distant sites. In many cancers, more invasive cells are more deformable than less invasive cells, but the extent to which mechanical phenotype, or mechanotype, can predict disease aggressiveness in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. Here we investigate the invasive potential and mechanical properties of immortalized PDAC cell lines derived from primary tumors and a secondary metastatic site, as well as noncancerous pancreatic ductal cells. To investigate how invasive behavior is associated with cell mechanotype, we flow cells through micron-scale pores using parallel microfiltration and microfluidic deformability cytometry; these results show that the ability of PDAC cells to passively transit through pores is only weakly correlated with their invasive potential. We also measure the Young's modulus of pancreatic ductal cells using atomic force microscopy, which reveals that there is a strong association between cell stiffness and invasive potential in PDAC cells. To determine the molecular origins of the variability in mechanotype across our PDAC cell lines, we analyze RNAseq data for genes that are known to regulate cell mechanotype. Our results show that vimentin, actin, and lamin A are among the most differentially expressed mechanoregulating genes across our panel of PDAC cell lines, as well as a cohort of 38 additional PDAC cell lines. We confirm levels of these proteins across our cell panel using immunoblotting, and find that levels of lamin A increase with both invasive potential and Young's modulus. Taken together, we find that stiffer PDAC cells are more invasive than more compliant cells, which challenges the paradigm that decreased cell stiffness is a hallmark of metastatic potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27761545      PMCID: PMC5866717          DOI: 10.1039/c6ib00135a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  83 in total

1.  Cancer cell stiffness: integrated roles of three-dimensional matrix stiffness and transforming potential.

Authors:  Erin L Baker; Jing Lu; Dihua Yu; Roger T Bonnecaze; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Measuring the elastic properties of living cells with atomic force microscopy indentation.

Authors:  Joanna L Mackay; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis.

Authors:  Guillaume Salbreux; Guillaume Charras; Ewa Paluch
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Mismatch in mechanical and adhesive properties induces pulsating cancer cell migration in epithelial monolayer.

Authors:  Meng-Horng Lee; Pei-Hsun Wu; Jack Rory Staunton; Robert Ros; Gregory D Longmore; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A microfluidic technique to probe cell deformability.

Authors:  David J Hoelzle; Bino A Varghese; Clara K Chan; Amy C Rowat
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Decreased mechanical stiffness in LMNA-/- cells is caused by defective nucleo-cytoskeletal integrity: implications for the development of laminopathies.

Authors:  Jos L V Broers; Emiel A G Peeters; Helma J H Kuijpers; Jorike Endert; Carlijn V C Bouten; Cees W J Oomens; Frank P T Baaijens; Frans C S Ramaekers
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Cross; Yu-Sheng Jin; Jianyu Rao; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 9.  Nuclear lamins: key regulators of nuclear structure and activities.

Authors:  Miron Prokocimer; Maya Davidovich; Malka Nissim-Rafinia; Naama Wiesel-Motiuk; Daniel Z Bar; Rachel Barkan; Eran Meshorer; Yosef Gruenbaum
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Estrogen promotes the brain metastatic colonization of triple negative breast cancer cells via an astrocyte-mediated paracrine mechanism.

Authors:  C A Sartorius; C T Hanna; B Gril; H Cruz; N J Serkova; K M Huber; P Kabos; T B Schedin; V F Borges; P S Steeg; D M Cittelly
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  36 in total

1.  A one-dimensional individual-based mechanical model of cell movement in heterogeneous tissues and its coarse-grained approximation.

Authors:  R J Murphy; P R Buenzli; R E Baker; M J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Quantitative Deformability Cytometry: Rapid, Calibrated Measurements of Cell Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Kendra D Nyberg; Kenneth H Hu; Sara H Kleinman; Damir B Khismatullin; Manish J Butte; Amy C Rowat
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Dynamic control of hydrogel crosslinking via sortase-mediated reversible transpeptidation.

Authors:  Matthew R Arkenberg; Dustin M Moore; Chien-Chi Lin
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  The promise of single-cell mechanophenotyping for clinical applications.

Authors:  Molly Kozminsky; Lydia L Sohn
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Biomimetic and enzyme-responsive dynamic hydrogels for studying cell-matrix interactions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hung-Yi Liu; Murray Korc; Chien-Chi Lin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Designer hydrogels: Shedding light on the physical chemistry of the pancreatic cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Chien-Chi Lin; Murray Korc
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Inertial Microfluidic Cell Stretcher (iMCS): Fully Automated, High-Throughput, and Near Real-Time Cell Mechanotyping.

Authors:  Yanxiang Deng; Steven P Davis; Fan Yang; Kevin S Paulsen; Maneesh Kumar; Rebecca Sinnott DeVaux; Xianhui Wang; Douglas S Conklin; Assad Oberai; Jason I Herschkowitz; Aram J Chung
Journal:  Small       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 8.  Metabolic reprogramming by driver mutation-tumor microenvironment interplay in pancreatic cancer: new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Henriette Berg Andersen; Renata Ialchina; Stine Falsig Pedersen; Dominika Czaplinska
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  Differential Contributions of Actin and Myosin to the Physical Phenotypes and Invasion of Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Angelyn V Nguyen; Brittany Trompetto; Xing Haw Marvin Tan; Michael B Scott; Kenneth Hsueh-Heng Hu; Eric Deeds; Manish J Butte; Pei Yu Chiou; Amy C Rowat
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.321

10.  A constriction channel analysis of astrocytoma stiffness and disease progression.

Authors:  P M Graybill; R K Bollineni; Z Sheng; R V Davalos; R Mirzaeifar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.