| Literature DB >> 27760531 |
Yan-Ning Li1, Dong-Xiao Nong2, Bo Wei3, Qi-Ming Feng4, Hong-Ye Luo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Healthcare in China has significantly improved, meanwhile many socio-economic risk factors and health conditions factors affect accessibility and utilization of health services in rural areas. Inequity of health service in China needs to be estimated and reduced. Andersen behavioral model is useful to assess the association of health service utilization with predisposing, enabling, and need factors.Entities:
Keywords: Andersen behavioral model; Health service utilization; Impact
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27760531 PMCID: PMC5070132 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1825-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Descriptive information of study subjects
| Characteristics | Total number | Value/percentage |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Age (in years) | 4634 | 32.72 ± 21.76 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 2429 | 52.42 % |
| Female | 2205 | 47.58 % |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 1973 | 42.58 % |
| Married | 2488 | 53.69 % |
| Separated/Divorced | 18 | 0.39 % |
| Widowed | 155 | 3.34 % |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Han | 4583 | 98.90 % |
| Others | 51 | 1.10 % |
| Family size | 4634 | 6.02 ± 2.26 |
|
| ||
| Educational level | ||
| No education | 905 | 19.52 % |
| Primary school | 1352 | 29.18 % |
| Secondary school | 1784 | 38.50 % |
| High school | 457 | 9.86 % |
| College or more | 136 | 2.93 % |
| Time to nearest health facility (min) | 4634 | 10.52 ± 11.29 |
| Medical expense | 4634 | 4242.16 ± 9046.85 |
| Health insurance coverage (RMB) | 4634 | 172.92 ± 69.40 |
|
| ||
| Chronic diseases | ||
| Yes | 536 | 11.57 % |
| No | 4098 | 88.43 % |
Potential risk factors for the utilization of outpatient services
| Characteristics | Physician visit | No physician visit |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 41.51 ± 26.29 | 31.19 ± 20.50 | <0.001 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 313 | 2116(14.79 %) | <0.001 |
| Femalea | 373 | 1832(20.36 %) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Singlea | 208 | 1765(11.78 %) | <0.001 |
| Married | 432 | 2056(21.01 %) | |
| Separated/Divorced/Widowed | 46 | 127(36.22 %) | |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Han | 672 | 3911(17.18 %) | 0.011 |
| Othersa | 14 | 37(37.84 %) | |
| Family size (people) | 5.56 ± 2.25 | 6.10 ± 2.25 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Educational level | |||
| No educationa | 219 | 686(31.92 %) | <0.001 |
| Primary school | 245 | 1107(22.13 %) | |
| Secondary school | 183 | 1601(11.43 %) | |
| High school | 36 | 421(8.55 %) | |
| College or more | 3 | 133(2.26 %) | |
| Time to nearest health facility (min) | 10.21 ± 10.60 | 12.35 ± 14.71 | <0.001 |
| Expenditure on healthcare (RMB) | 4671.77 ± 7433.72 | 4167.51 ± 9297.44 | 0.180 |
| Expenditure of NCMS (RMB) | 159.31 ± 67.05 | 175.29 ± 69.53 | < 0.001 |
|
| |||
| Chronic diseases | |||
| Yes | 246 | 290(84.83 %) | <0.001 |
| Noa | 440 | 3658(12.03 %) | |
a reference group
Potential risk factors for the utilization of inpatient services
| Characteristics | Hospitalization | No Hospitalization |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 40.92 ± 25.07 | 32.19 ± 21.43 | < 0.001 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 113 | 2316(4.88 %) | < 0.001 |
| Femalea | 167 | 2038(8.19 %) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Singlea | 54 | 1919(2.81 %) | < 0.001 |
| Married | 205 | 2283(8.89 %) | |
| Separated/Divorced/Widowed | 21 | 152(13.82 %) | |
| Ethnicity | |||
| Han | 277 | 4306(6.43 %) | 0.960 |
| Othersa | 3 | 48(6.25 %) | |
| Family size (people) | 6.02 ± 2.45 | 6.02 ± 2.24 | 0.980 |
|
| |||
| Educational level | |||
| No educationa | 82 | 823(9.96 %) | < 0.001 |
| Primary school | 65 | 1287(5.05 %) | |
| Secondary school | 109 | 1675(6.51 %) | |
| High school | 21 | 436(4.82 %) | |
| College or more | 3 | 133(2.26 %) | |
| Time to nearest health facility (min) | 9.94 ± 9.36 | 10.56 ± 11.41 | 0.370 |
| Expenditure on healthcare (RMB) | 8323.18 ± 16336.27 | 3979.71 ± 8298.49 | < 0.001 |
| Expenditure of NCMS (RMB) | 170.43 ± 75.47 | 173.08 ± 68.99 | 0.540 |
|
| |||
| Chronic diseases | |||
| Yes | 96 | 440(21.82 %) | < 0.001 |
| Noa | 184 | 3914(4.70 %) | |
a reference group
The odds ratio and 95 % CI from multivariate logistic regression models for the utilization of physician visit and hospitalization
| Characteristics | Physician visit | Hospitalization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| |
|
| ||||
| Age (year) | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.280 | 1.02(1.01–1.03) | < 0.001 |
| Gender | 1.20(1.01–1.43) | 0.040 | 1.40(1.08–1.81) | 0.010 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Single a | < 0.001 | |||
| Married | 1.50 (1.22–1.85) | < 0.001 | 5.30 (3.28–8.55) | |
| Separated/Divorced/Widowed | 0.99 (0.70–1.54) | 0.970 | 7.06 (3.26–15.26) | < 0.001 |
| Ethnicity | 1.03 (0.51–1.21) | 0.270 | 1.59 (0.63–4.06) | 0.330 |
| Family size (people) | 0.92 (0.88–0.96) | <0.001 | 0.94 (0.84–1.06) | 0.940 |
|
| ||||
| Educational level | 0.58 (0.52–0.64) | < 0.001 | 0.75 (0.65–0.86) | < 0.001 |
| Time to nearest health facility (min) | 0.90 (0.81–0.92) | < 0.001 | 0.98 (0.995–1.019) | 0.240 |
| Expenditure on healthcare (RMB) | 1.00(0.991–1.001) | 0.610 | 1.01(1.002–1.099) | < 0.001 |
| Expenditure of NCMS (RMB) | 1.00(0.998–1.004) | 0.450 | 1.00(0.999–1.006) | 0.190 |
|
| ||||
| Chronic diseases | 5.87 (4.71–7.32) | < 0.001 | 4.04 (2.90–5.61) | < 0.001 |
| Yes | ||||
| No | ||||
a reference group
The medical expenditure, payment, and proportion in the rural area and the entire province of Guangxi
| Medical expenditure and payment | Guangxi province | Rural area in Guangxia |
|---|---|---|
| Medical expenditure per physician visit (RMB) | 86.7 | 99.7 |
| Proportion of the payment of clinic expenses (%) | ||
| NCMS account | 20.7 | 28.8 |
| Reimburse partly or deduction | 4.9 | 12.4 |
| Self-paid | 74.4 | 58.8 |
| Mean expenditure of hospitalization (RMB) | 3648 | 2507 |
| Reimbursement of hospitalization (RMB) | 976 | 762 |
a The data come from Household Health Service Investigation in Guangxi 2008