Literature DB >> 14572850

Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter?

Dana A Glei1, Noreen Goldman, Germán Rodríguez.   

Abstract

This study examines factors associated with the use of biomedical care during pregnancy in Guatemala, focusing on the extent to which complications in an ongoing or previous pregnancy affect a woman's decisions to seek care. The findings, based on multilevel models, suggest that obstetrical need, as well as demographic, social, and cultural factors, are important predictors of pregnancy care. In contrast, measures of availability and access to health services have modest effects. The results also suggest the importance of unobserved variables--such as quality of care--in explaining women's decisions about pregnancy care. These results imply that improving proximity to biomedical services is unlikely to have a dramatic impact on utilization in the absence of additional changes that improve the quality of care or reduce barriers to access. Moreover, current efforts aimed at incorporating midwives into the formal health-care system may need to extend their focus beyond the modification of midwife practices to consider the provision of culturally appropriate, high-quality services by traditional and biomedical providers alike.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572850     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00140-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  54 in total

1.  Individual and Area Level Factors Associated with Prenatal, Delivery, and Postnatal Care in Pakistan.

Authors:  Henna Budhwani; Kristine Ria Hearld; Hanne Harbison
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context.

Authors:  Lale Say; Rosalind Raine
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  Mainstreaming nutrition in maternal, newborn and child health: barriers to seeking services from existing maternal, newborn, child health programmes.

Authors:  Peter K Streatfield; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Nurul Alam; Malay K Mridha
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Cultural adaptation of birthing services in rural Ayacucho, Peru.

Authors:  Sabine Gabrysch; Claudia Lema; Eduardo Bedriñana; Marco A Bautista; Rosa Malca; Oona M R Campbell; J Jaime Miranda
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Gestational age at first antenatal visit in Namibia.

Authors:  Nandini Thogarapalli; Paul Mkandawire; Joseph Kangmennaang; Isaac Luginaah; Godwin Arku
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Overcoming the perceived barriers to health care access among single mothers in coastal Kenya.

Authors:  J J Cohen; M Blevins; A Mapenzi; L Reppart; J Reppart; R Mainthia; C W Wester
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Determinants of place of birth decisions in uncomplicated childbirth in Bangladesh: an empirical study.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Moni Paul; Lynn Sibley
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 8.  Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use.

Authors:  Sabine Gabrysch; Oona M R Campbell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Social differentiation and embodied dispositions: a qualitative study of maternal care-seeking behaviour for near-miss morbidity in Bolivia.

Authors:  Mattias Rööst; Cecilia Jonsson; Jerker Liljestrand; Birgitta Essén
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Household decision-making about delivery in health facilities: evidence from Tanzania.

Authors:  E J Danforth; M E Kruk; P C Rockers; G Mbaruku; S Galea
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.