Literature DB >> 27760305

Differences in the Phosphorylation-Dependent Regulation of Prenylation of Rap1A and Rap1B.

Jessica M Wilson1, Jeremy W Prokop2, Ellen Lorimer1, Elizabeth Ntantie3, Carol L Williams4.   

Abstract

Two isoforms of the small GTPase Rap1, Rap1A and Rap1B, participate in cell adhesion; Rap1A promotes steady state adhesion, while Rap1B regulates dynamic changes in cell adhesion. These events depend on the prenylation of Rap1, which promotes its membrane localization. Here, we identify previously unsuspected differences in the regulation of prenylation of Rap1A versus Rap1B, due in part to their different phosphorylation-dependent interactions with the chaperone protein SmgGDS-607. Previous studies indicate that the activation of Gαs protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) phosphorylates S-179 and S-180 in the polybasic region (PBR) of Rap1B, which inhibits Rap1B binding to SmgGDS-607 and diminishes Rap1B prenylation and membrane localization. In this study, we investigate how phosphorylation in the PBR of multiple small GTPases, including K-Ras4B, RhoA, Rap1A, and Rap1B, affects their binding to SmgGDS, with emphasis on differences between Rap1A and Rap1B. We identify the amino acids in SmgGDS-607 necessary for binding of Rap1A and Rap1B, and present homology models examining the binding between Rap1A or Rap1B and SmgGDS-607. Unlike Rap1B, phosphorylation in the PBR of Rap1A does not detectably inhibit its prenylation or its binding to SmgGDS-607. Activation of GPCRs suppresses Rap1A prenylation, but unlike this effect on Rap1B, the GPCR-mediated suppression of Rap1A prenylation can occur independently of Rap1A phosphorylation and does not detectably diminish Rap1A membrane localization. These data demonstrate unexpected evolutionarily conserved differences in the ability of GPCRs to regulate the prenylation of Rap1B compared to Rap1A. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G protein-coupled receptor; Rap1GDS1; SmgGDS; polybasic region; protein isoprenylation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27760305      PMCID: PMC5153279          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  28 in total

1.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome.

Authors:  S V Muse; B S Gaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  K-Ras4B phosphorylation at Ser181 is inhibited by calmodulin and modulates K-Ras activity and function.

Authors:  B Alvarez-Moya; C López-Alcalá; M Drosten; O Bachs; N Agell
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  K Tamura; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylates and inactivates RhoA.

Authors:  N Sawada; H Itoh; J Yamashita; K Doi; M Inoue; K Masatsugu; Y Fukunaga; S Sakaguchi; M Sone; K Yamahara ; T Yurugi; K Nakao
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-01-26       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Rap1A is a substrate for cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in human neutrophils.

Authors:  L A Quilliam; H Mueller; B P Bohl; V Prossnitz; L A Sklar; C J Der; G M Bokoch
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Enhancement of the actions of smg p21 GDP/GTP exchange protein by the protein kinase A-catalyzed phosphorylation of smg p21.

Authors:  Y Hata; K Kaibuchi; S Kawamura; M Hiroyoshi; H Shirataki; Y Takai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Protein kinase A phosphorylation of RhoA mediates the morphological and functional effects of cyclic AMP in cytotoxic lymphocytes.

Authors:  P Lang; F Gesbert; M Delespine-Carmagnat; R Stancou; M Pouchelet; J Bertoglio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  13 in total

1.  Structure-based analysis of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor SmgGDS reveals armadillo-repeat motifs and key regions for activity and GTPase binding.

Authors:  Hikaru Shimizu; Sachiko Toma-Fukai; Shinya Saijo; Nobutaka Shimizu; Kenji Kontani; Toshiaki Katada; Toshiyuki Shimizu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The chaperone SmgGDS-607 has a dual role, both activating and inhibiting farnesylation of small GTPases.

Authors:  Desirée García-Torres; Carol A Fierke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  GEF mechanism revealed by the structure of SmgGDS-558 and farnesylated RhoA complex and its implication for a chaperone mechanism.

Authors:  Hikaru Shimizu; Sachiko Toma-Fukai; Kenji Kontani; Toshiaki Katada; Toshiyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Splice switching an oncogenic ratio of SmgGDS isoforms as a strategy to diminish malignancy.

Authors:  Anthony C Brandt; Lisa McNally; Ellen L Lorimer; Bethany Unger; Olivia J Koehn; Kiall F Suazo; Lisa Rein; Aniko Szabo; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Mark D Distefano; Michael J Flister; Frank Rigo; Mark T McNally; Carol L Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  PHLPPing the balance: restoration of protein kinase C in cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Tovell; Alexandra C Newton
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 6.  RAP GTPases and platelet integrin signaling.

Authors:  Lucia Stefanini; Wolfgang Bergmeier
Journal:  Platelets       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 7.  A Non-Canonical Calmodulin Target Motif Comprising a Polybasic Region and Lipidated Terminal Residue Regulates Localization.

Authors:  Benjamin M M Grant; Masahiro Enomoto; Mitsuhiko Ikura; Christopher B Marshall
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Cyclase-associated protein 1 (CAP1) is a prenyl-binding partner of Rap1 GTPase.

Authors:  Xuefeng Zhang; Shufen Cao; Guillermo Barila; Martin M Edreira; Kyoungja Hong; Mamta Wankhede; Nyla Naim; Matthias Buck; Daniel L Altschuler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  SmgGDS: An Emerging Master Regulator of Prenylation and Trafficking by Small GTPases in the Ras and Rho Families.

Authors:  Anthony C Brandt; Olivia J Koehn; Carol L Williams
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-06-16

Review 10.  The Many Faces of Rap1 GTPase.

Authors:  Anna Jaśkiewicz; Beata Pająk; Arkadiusz Orzechowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.