| Literature DB >> 27757709 |
Masato Nishimura1, Toshiko Tokoro2, Satoru Yamazaki3, Tetsuya Hashimoto3, Hiroyuki Kobayashi3, Toshihiko Ono3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the prevalence, prognosis, and effect of endothelin receptor antagonists on survival in end-stage kidney disease patients with idiopathic pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: End-stage kidney disease; Endothelin receptor antagonist; Pre-capillary; Pulmonary hypertension; Right heart catheterization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27757709 PMCID: PMC5698371 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-016-1344-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol ISSN: 1342-1751 Impact factor: 2.801
Fig. 1Flow chart of patient selection. The levels of dyspnea were World Health Organization functional class ≥ II, and hypotension was in a state of systolic blood pressure consistently below 100 mmHg. LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, AVF arteriovenous fistula, AS aortic valvular stenosis, MS mitral valvular stenosis, PH pulmonary hypertension
Clinical characteristics of patients at the onset of pulmonary hypertension
| Patient number | Age (years) | Dialysis duration (months) | Female gender (1 = yes, 0 = no) | Diabetes mellitus (1 = yes, 0 = no) | Body mass index (kg/m2) | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Duration after making vascular access (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 18.1 | 78 | 3 |
| 2 | 46 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 26.3 | 82 | 4 |
| 3 | 71 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17.7 | 66 | 3 |
| 4 | 47 | 59 | 1 | 1 | 22.4 | 72 | 4 |
| 5 | 71 | 136 | 1 | 1 | 24.6 | 88 | 138 |
| 6 | 53 | 420 | 1 | 0 | 18.4 | 56 | 5 |
| 7 | 62 | 396 | 0 | 0 | 18.9 | 84 | 400 |
| 8 | 76 | 214 | 1 | 0 | 18.6 | 76 | 220 |
| 9 | 64 | 344 | 1 | 0 | 19.4 | 76 | 6 |
| 10 | 83 | 135 | 1 | 0 | 18.2 | 68 | 135 |
| 11 | 75 | 110 | 1 | 0 | 23.1 | 86 | 16 |
| 12 | 76 | 260 | 1 | 0 | 17.7 | 82 | 4 |
| 13 | 69 | 519 | 1 | 0 | 19.5 | 78 | 6 |
| 14 | 70 | 436 | 0 | 0 | 23.6 | 74 | 250 |
| 15 | 69 | 159 | 1 | 0 | 23.3 | 82 | 166 |
| Median (maximum, minimum) | 70 (83, 46) | 159 (519, 0) | 19.4 (26.3, 17.7) | 78 (88, 56) | 6 (3, 400) |
Hemodynamic measurements in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and right heart catheterization (RHC)
| Patient number | TTE | RHC | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic PG in tricuspid valve (mmHg) | LVEF (%) | Systolic PAP (mmHg) | Mean PAP (mmHg) | PAWP (mmHg) | RAP (mmHg) | PVR (Woods units) | TPG (mmHg) | CI (l/min/m2) | |
| 1 | 88 | 76 | 75 | 50 | 14 | 6 | 14.4 | 36 | 1.7 |
| 2 | 68 | 74 | 58 | 44 | 12 | 4 | 9.5 | 32 | 2.3 |
| 3 | 60 | 76 | 68 | 42 | 7 | 7 | 9.2 | 35 | 2.6 |
| 4 | 72 | 80 | 75 | 57 | 10 | 4 | 9.4 | 47 | 3.3 |
| 5 | 89 | 68 | 55 | 40 | 14 | 8 | 6.1 | 26 | 2.9 |
| 6 | 59 | 78 | 47 | 34 | 14 | 2 | 7.7 | 20 | 1.7 |
| 7 | 75 | 70 | 62 | 44 | 13 | 8 | 9.1 | 31 | 2.8 |
| 8 | 84 | 63 | 48 | 33 | 14 | 9 | 5.1 | 19 | 2.5 |
| 9 | 100 | 72 | 68 | 37 | 9 | 4 | 6.2 | 28 | 3.0 |
| 10 | 63 | 76 | 65 | 38 | 12 | 5 | 10.4 | 26 | 1.7 |
| 11 | 109 | 77 | 54 | 36 | 12 | 2 | 6.5 | 24 | 2.5 |
| 12 | 75 | 79 | 44 | 33 | 8 | 5 | 6.1 | 25 | 2.7 |
| 13 | 73 | 72 | 52 | 34 | 12 | 8 | 4.8 | 22 | 3.1 |
| 14 | 78 | 74 | 43 | 27 | 12 | 9 | 4.6 | 15 | 2.7 |
| 15 | 84 | 65 | 41 | 28 | 11 | 4 | 3.1 | 17 | 2.4 |
| Median (maximum, minimum) | 75 (109, 59) | 74 (80, 63) | 55 (75, 41) | 37 (57, 27) | 12 (14, 7) | 5 (9, 2) | 6.5 (14.4, 3.1) | 26 (47, 15) | 2.6 (3.3, 1.7) |
PG pressure gradient, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, PAP pulmonary arterial pressure, PAWP pulmonary artery wedge pressure, RAP right atrial pressure, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, TPG transpulmonary pressure gradient, CI cardiac index
Treatment and outcome after diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension
| Patient number | Closure of vascular access (1 = yes, 0 = no) | Endothelin receptor antagonists | Heart failure death (1 = yes, 0 = no) | Survival after the onset (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 2 | 0 | Bosentan 250 mg/day | 0 | 96 |
| 3 | 1 | Bosentan 125 mg/day | 1 | 18 |
| 4 | 1 | Bosentan 187.5 mg/day | 0 | 117 |
| 5 | 0 | Bosentan 187.5 mg/day → Ambrisentan 5 mg/day | 1 | 61 |
| 6 | 1 | Bosentan 125 mg/day | 1 | 18 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
| 8 | 0 | Bosentan 125 mg/day → Ambrisentan 2.5 mg/day | 1 | 58 |
| 9 | 0 | Bosentan 250 mg/day → Ambrisentan 5 mg/day | 1 | 44 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| 11 | 0 | Bosentan 125 mg/day → 0 | 1 | 49 |
| 12 | 0 | Ambrisentan 2.5 mg/day | 0 | 20 |
| 13 | 0 | Bosentan 62.5 mg/day → Macitentan 5 mg/day | 0 | 16 |
| 14 | 1 | Ambrisentan 2.5 mg/day | 1 | 12 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 6/15 | 11/15 | 11/15 | *18 (117, 3) |
* Median (maximum, minimum)
Differences in clinical features between patients with or without heart failure death
| Heart failure death ( | Survived ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 71 (83, 53) | 58 (76, 46) | 0.280 |
| Dialysis duration, months | 159 (436, 0) | 160 (519, 6) | 0.979 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 1/11(9) | 2/4 (50) | 0.255 |
| Female gender, | 9/11 (82) | 3/4 (75) | 0.817 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 18.9 (24.6, 17.7) | 21.0 (26.3, 17.7) | 0.661 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 76 (88, 56) | 80 (82, 72) | 0.753 |
| Duration after making vascular access, months | 135 (400, 3) | 4 (4, 6) | 0.104 |
| Closure of vascular access, | 5/11 (45) | 1/4 (25) | 0.516 |
| Systolic pressure gradient in tricuspid valve at the onset, mmHg | 84 (109, 59) | 72 (75, 68) | 0.226 |
| Systolic pressure gradient in tricuspid valve 3 months after the onset, mmHg | 84 (120, 24) | 18 (28, 8) | 0.010 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 74 (78, 63) | 76.5 (80, 72) | 0.226 |
| Systolic PAP, mmHg | 55 (75, 41) | 55 (75, 44) | 0.949 |
| Diastolic PAP, mmHg | 23 (36, 15) | 30 (40, 20) | 0.280 |
| Mean PAP, mmHg | 37 (50, 27) | 39 (57, 33) | 0.571 |
| RAP, mmHg | 6 (9, 2) | 4.5 (8, 4) | 0.661 |
| PVR, Woods units | 6.5 (14.4, 3.1) | 7.8 (9.5, 4.8) | 0.851 |
| PAWP, mmHg | 12 (14, 7) | 11 (12, 8) | 0.226 |
| TPG, mmHg | 25 (36, 15) | 29 (47, 22) | 0.351 |
| CI, l/min/m2 | 2.5 (3.0, 1.7) | 2.9 (3.3, 2.3) | 0.412 |
| Blood hemoglobin, g/l | 109 (133, 95) | 121 (134, 107) | 0.226 |
| Serum calcium, mmol/l | 2.3 (2.4, 2.1) | 2.2 (2.3, 2.0) | 0.571 |
| Serum inorganic phosphate, mmol/l | 1.5 (1.8, 0.7) | 1.4 (1.7, 1.2) | 0.753 |
| Serum albumin, g/l | 35 (39, 28) | 34 (37, 31) | 0.961 |
| Serum C-reactive protein, mg/l | 2.5 (6.3, 0.2) | 2.1 (6.4, 0.7) | 0.949 |
| Endothelin receptor antagonists, | 7 (64) | 4 (100) | 0.038 |
Continuous variables are expressed as median value (maximum, minimum)
PAP pulmonary arterial pressure, PAWP pulmonary artery wedge pressure, RAP right atrial pressure, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, TPG transpulmonary pressure gradient, CI cardiac index
Differences in baseline clinical features between patients with or without endothelin receptor antagonists (ETAs)
| ETAs (+) ( | ETAs (−) ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 70 (76, 46) | 71 (83, 62) | 0.571 |
| Dialysis duration, months | 214 (519, 0) | 147 (396, 4) | 0.661 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 3/11 (27) | 0/4 (0) | 0.082 |
| Female gender, | 9/11 (82) | 3/4 (75) | 0.817 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 19.5 (26.3, 17.7) | 18.6 (23.3, 18.1) | 0.489 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 76 (88, 56) | 80 (84, 68) | 0.661 |
| Duration after making vascular access, months | 6 (250, 3) | 151 (400, 3) | 0.412 |
| Closure of vascular access, | 4/11 (36) | 2/4 (50) | 0.694 |
| Systolic pressure gradient in tricuspid valve at the onset, mmHg | 75 (109, 59) | 80 (88, 63) | 0.949 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 74 (80, 63) | 73 (76, 65) | 0.489 |
| Systolic PAP, mmHg | 54 (75, 43) | 64 (75, 41) | 0.571 |
| Mean PAP, mmHg | 36 (57, 27) | 41 (50, 28) | 0.489 |
| RAP, mmHg | 5 (9, 2) | 6 (8, 4) | 0.949 |
| PVR, Woods units | 6.2 (9.5, 4.6) | 9.8 (14.4, 3.0) | 0.343 |
| PAWP, mmHg | 12 (14, 7) | 12 (14, 11) | 0.489 |
| TPG, mmHg | 25 (47, 15) | 28 (36, 17) | 0.661 |
| CI, l/min/m2 | 2.7 (3.3, 1.7) | 2.1 (2.8, 1.7) | 0.138 |
| Blood hemoglobin, g/l | 113 (134, 97) | 107 (119, 95) | 0.343 |
| Serum calcium, mmol/l | 2.2 (2.3, 2.0) | 2.4 (2.4, 2.2) | 0.056 |
| Serum inorganic phosphate, mmol/l | 1.4 (1.8, 0.9) | 1.5 (1.8, 0.7) | 0.661 |
| Serum albumin, g/l | 34 (39, 28) | 36 (37, 31) | 0.661 |
| Serum C-reactive protein, mg/l | 3.1 (6.4, 0.2) | 2.4 (2.7, 0.4) | 0.489 |
Continuous variables are expressed as median value (maximum, minimum)
PAP pulmonary arterial pressure, PAWP pulmonary artery wedge pressure, RAP right atrial pressure, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, TPG transpulmonary pressure gradient, CI cardiac index
Fig. 2Changes in systolic pressure gradients in tricuspid valve at onset of pulmonary hypertension and at 3 months after the onset. Mean systolic pressure gradients in tricuspid valve tended to increase in 4 patients without endothelin receptor antagonists (a) (77.5 ± 11.1 versus 92.5 ± 18.7 mmHg, P = 0.097), whereas those decreased in patients administered with endothelin receptor antagonists (b) (78.8 ± 15.7 versus 46.8 ± 32.7 mmHg, P = 0.015)
Fig. 3Heart failure death-free survival rates in patients with or without endothelin receptor antagonists. Mean survival time in patients without endothelin receptor antagonists was 7.5 ± 2.1 months. Heart failure death-free survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 100 and 71 % in patients with endothelin receptor antagonists, whereas they were 25 and 0 % in patients without