BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference section of retrieved articles. Searches are current as of January 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials involving patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Five review authors independently selected studies, assessed study quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We included 12 randomised controlled trials involving 1471 patients. All the trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to six months). After treatment, patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists could walk on average 33.71 metres (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.90 to 42.52 metres) further than those treated with placebo in a six-minute walk test. Endothelin receptor antagonists improved more patients' World Health Organization/New York Heart Association (WHO/NYHA) functional class status than placebo (odds ratio (OR) 1.60; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14), and reduced the odds of functional class deterioration compared with placebo (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42). There was a reduction in mortality that did not reach statistical significance on endothelin receptor antagonists (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24), and limited data suggest that endothelin receptor antagonists improve the Borg dyspnoea score and cardiopulmonary haemodynamics in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, and endothelin receptor antagonists were well tolerated in this population. However, several cases of irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan have been reported that led to license holder for sitaxsentan to withdraw the product from all markets worldwide. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Endothelin receptor antagonists can increase exercise capacity, improve WHO/NYHA functional class, prevent WHO/NYHA functional class deterioration, reduce dyspnoea and improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO/NYHA functional class II and III. However, there was only a trend towards endothelin receptor antagonists reducing mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Efficacy data are strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. The irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan and its withdrawal from global markets emphasise the importance of hepatic monitoring in patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists.
BACKGROUND:Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference section of retrieved articles. Searches are current as of January 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials involving patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Five review authors independently selected studies, assessed study quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: We included 12 randomised controlled trials involving 1471 patients. All the trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to six months). After treatment, patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists could walk on average 33.71 metres (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.90 to 42.52 metres) further than those treated with placebo in a six-minute walk test. Endothelin receptor antagonists improved more patients' World Health Organization/New York Heart Association (WHO/NYHA) functional class status than placebo (odds ratio (OR) 1.60; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14), and reduced the odds of functional class deterioration compared with placebo (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42). There was a reduction in mortality that did not reach statistical significance on endothelin receptor antagonists (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24), and limited data suggest that endothelin receptor antagonists improve the Borg dyspnoea score and cardiopulmonary haemodynamics in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, and endothelin receptor antagonists were well tolerated in this population. However, several cases of irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan have been reported that led to license holder for sitaxsentan to withdraw the product from all markets worldwide. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Endothelin receptor antagonists can increase exercise capacity, improve WHO/NYHA functional class, prevent WHO/NYHA functional class deterioration, reduce dyspnoea and improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO/NYHA functional class II and III. However, there was only a trend towards endothelin receptor antagonists reducing mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Efficacy data are strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. The irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan and its withdrawal from global markets emphasise the importance of hepatic monitoring in patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists.
Authors: J R Seibold; C P Denton; D E Furst; L Guillevin; L J Rubin; A Wells; M Matucci Cerinic; G Riemekasten; P Emery; H Chadha-Boreham; P Charef; S Roux; C M Black Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-07
Authors: J H Korn; M Mayes; M Matucci Cerinic; M Rainisio; J Pope; E Hachulla; E Rich; P Carpentier; J Molitor; J R Seibold; V Hsu; L Guillevin; S Chatterjee; H H Peter; J Coppock; A Herrick; P A Merkel; R Simms; C P Denton; D Furst; N Nguyen; M Gaitonde; Carol Black Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-12
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Alan L Hinderliter; Adam Torbicki; Thierry Fourme; Gerald Simonneau; Tomas Pulido; Nilda Espinola-Zavaleta; Guido Rocchi; Alessandra Manes; Robert Frantz; Marcin Kurzyna; Sherif F Nagueh; Robyn Barst; Richard Channick; Karl Dujardin; Andrew Kronenberg; Isabelle Leconte; Maurizio Rainisio; Lewis Rubin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-04-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robyn J Barst; Ronald J Oudiz; Anthony Beardsworth; Bruce H Brundage; Gerald Simonneau; Hossein A Ghofrani; David P Sundin; Nazzareno Galiè Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: A Giaid; M Yanagisawa; D Langleben; R P Michel; R Levy; H Shennib; S Kimura; T Masaki; W P Duguid; D J Stewart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-06-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Xavier Jaïs; Andrea M D'Armini; Pavel Jansa; Adam Torbicki; Marion Delcroix; Hossein A Ghofrani; Marius M Hoeper; Irene M Lang; Eckhard Mayer; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Loïc Perchenet; Adele Morganti; Gérald Simonneau; Lewis J Rubin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Rennie L Rhee; Nicole B Gabler; Sapna Sangani; Amy Praestgaard; Peter A Merkel; Steven M Kawut Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Victoria C Ziesenitz; Walter E Haefeli; Johannes N van den Anker; Matthias Gorenflo Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Bum-Yong Kang; Kathy K Park; Jennifer M Kleinhenz; Tamara C Murphy; David E Green; Kaiser M Bijli; Samantha M Yeligar; Kristal A Carthan; Charles D Searles; Roy L Sutliff; C Michael Hart Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Anthony P Davenport; Kelly A Hyndman; Neeraj Dhaun; Christopher Southan; Donald E Kohan; Jennifer S Pollock; David M Pollock; David J Webb; Janet J Maguire Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 25.468