Florian Blachutzik1, Niklas Boeder2, Jens Wiebe3, Alessio Mattesini4, Oliver Dörr2, Astrid Most2, Timm Bauer2, Jens Röther5, Monique Tröbs5, Christian Schlundt5, Stephan Achenbach5, Christian W Hamm2, Holger M Nef2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. florian.blachutzik@uk-erlangen.de. 2. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. 3. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 4. Department of Heart and Vessels, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy. 5. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to investigate the acute mechanical effects of post-dilatation on bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT). BACKGROUND: Post-dilatation with high-pressure balloons is regarded as a key component of BRS implantation for treatment of coronary artery stenoses. However, the impact of post-dilatation on BRS in vivo has not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: OCT was performed after the implantation procedure of 51 everolimus-eluting or novolimus-eluting polylactic acid-based BRS with (n = 27) or without non-compliant balloon post-dilatation (n = 24). The number of malapposed struts, strut fractures, edge dissections, residual in-scaffold area stenosis, and incomplete scaffold apposition area was analyzed over the complete length of each BRS with a spacing of 1 mm. RESULTS: OCT revealed a significantly lower incomplete scaffold apposition area if post-dilatation was performed (0.16 ± 0.49 mm2 with post-dilatation vs. 2.65 ± 2.78 mm2 without post-dilatation, p < 0.001), as well as a significantly lower absolute number of malapposed struts (1 ± 2 with post-dilatation vs. 13 ± 13 without post-dilatation, p < 0.001). No significant differences regarding residual in-scaffold area stenosis, strut fracture, edge dissection, symmetry index, or eccentricity index were observed in patients with vs. without post-dilatation. CONCLUSION: Post-dilatation of BRS with non-compliant balloons significantly reduces the number of malapposed struts and incomplete scaffold apposition area without inducing higher rates of edge dissection or strut fracture.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to investigate the acute mechanical effects of post-dilatation on bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT). BACKGROUND: Post-dilatation with high-pressure balloons is regarded as a key component of BRS implantation for treatment of coronary artery stenoses. However, the impact of post-dilatation on BRS in vivo has not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: OCT was performed after the implantation procedure of 51 everolimus-eluting or novolimus-eluting polylactic acid-based BRS with (n = 27) or without non-compliant balloon post-dilatation (n = 24). The number of malapposed struts, strut fractures, edge dissections, residual in-scaffold area stenosis, and incomplete scaffold apposition area was analyzed over the complete length of each BRS with a spacing of 1 mm. RESULTS: OCT revealed a significantly lower incomplete scaffold apposition area if post-dilatation was performed (0.16 ± 0.49 mm2 with post-dilatation vs. 2.65 ± 2.78 mm2 without post-dilatation, p < 0.001), as well as a significantly lower absolute number of malapposed struts (1 ± 2 with post-dilatation vs. 13 ± 13 without post-dilatation, p < 0.001). No significant differences regarding residual in-scaffold area stenosis, strut fracture, edge dissection, symmetry index, or eccentricity index were observed in patients with vs. without post-dilatation. CONCLUSION: Post-dilatation of BRS with non-compliant balloons significantly reduces the number of malapposed struts and incomplete scaffold apposition area without inducing higher rates of edge dissection or strut fracture.
Authors: Josep Gomez-Lara; Roberto Diletti; Salvatore Brugaletta; Yoshinobu Onuma; Vasim Farooq; Leif Thuesen; Dougal McClean; Jacques Koolen; John A Ormiston; Stefan Windecker; Robert Whitbourn; Dariusz Dudek; Cécile Dorange; Susan Veldhof; Richard Rapoza; Evelyn Regar; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Patrick W Serruys Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Cihan Simsek; Antonios Karanasos; Michael Magro; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Yoshinobu Onuma; Evelyn Regar; Eric Boersma; Patrick W Serruys; Robert J van Geuns Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Neal G Uren; S P Schwarzacher; J A Metz; D P Lee; Y Honda; A C Yeung; P J Fitzgerald; P G Yock Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: José De Ribamar Costa; Alexandre Abizaid; Antonio L Bartorelli; Robert Whitbourn; Robert Jan van Geuns; Bernard Chevalier; Marcos Perin; Ashok Seth; Roberto Botelho; Patrick W Serruys Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Shinjo Sonoda; Yoshihiro Morino; Junya Ako; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Ali H M Hassan; Heidi N Bonneau; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey W Moses; Paul G Yock; Yasuhiro Honda; Richard E Kuntz; Peter J Fitzgerald Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-06-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pannipa Suwannasom; Yohei Sotomi; Yuki Ishibashi; Rafael Cavalcante; Felipe N Albuquerque; Carlos Macaya; John A Ormiston; Jonathan Hill; Irene M Lang; Mohaned Egred; Jean Fajadet; Maciej Lesiak; Jan G Tijssen; Joanna J Wykrzykowska; Robbert J de Winter; Bernard Chevalier; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Bert Everaert; Cordula Felix; Jacques Koolen; Peter den Heijer; Jose Henriques; Joanna Wykrzykowska; Rene van der Schaaf; Bart de Smet; Sjoerd Hofma; Roberto Diletti; Nicolas Van Mieghem; Evelyn Regar; Peter Smits; Robert-Jan M van Geuns Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Aydin Huseynov; Stefan Baumann; Holger Nef; Thomas Riemer; Steffen Schneider; Thomas Pfannenbecker; Stephan Achenbach; Julinda Mehilli; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori; Jochen Wöhrle; Ralf Zahn; Johannes Kastner; Axel Schmermund; Gert Richardt; Christian W Hamm; Ibrahim Akin Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 5.460