| Literature DB >> 27757113 |
Jinghua Wu1, Shan Jia2, Changxi Wang1, Wei Zhang1, Sixi Liu2, Xiaojing Zeng1, Huirong Mai2, Xiuli Yuan2, Yuanping Du1, Xiaodong Wang2, Xueyu Hong1, Xuemei Li1, Feiqiu Wen2, Xun Xu1, Jianhua Pan3, Changgang Li2, Xiao Liu4.
Abstract
Acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is one of the most common types of childhood cancer worldwide and chemotherapy is the main treatment approach. Despite good response rates to chemotherapy regiments, many patients eventually relapse and minimal residual disease (MRD) is the leading risk factor for relapse. The evolution of leukemic clones during disease development and treatment may have clinical significance. In this study, we performed immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) repertoire high throughput sequencing (HTS) on the diagnostic and post-treatment samples of 51 pediatric B-ALL patients. We identified leukemic IGH clones in 92.2% of the diagnostic samples and nearly half of the patients were polyclonal. About one-third of the leukemic clones have correct open reading frame in the complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) of IGH, which demonstrates that the leukemic B cells were in the early developmental stage. We also demonstrated the higher sensitivity of HTS in MRD detection and investigated the clinical value of using peripheral blood in MRD detection and monitoring the clonal IGH evolution. In addition, we found leukemic clones were extensively undergoing continuous clonal IGH evolution by variable gene replacement. Dynamic frequency change and newly emerged evolved IGH clones were identified upon the pressure of chemotherapy. In summary, we confirmed the high sensitivity and universal applicability of HTS in MRD detection. We also reported the ubiquitous evolved IGH clones in B-ALL samples and their response to chemotherapy during treatment.Entities:
Keywords: IGH; acute B lymphoblast leukemia; clonal evolution; high throughput sequencing; minimal residual disease
Year: 2016 PMID: 27757113 PMCID: PMC5048610 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Leukemic clones identification in 52 B-ALL patients.
| Disease | Number of patients | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 7.8 |
| 1 | 23 | 45.1 |
| >1 | 24 | 47.1 |
| Total | 51 | 100 |
Figure 1Correlation of B-ALL disease risk with the number of leukemic clones in diagnostic sample. HR, high risk; IR, intermediate risk; SR, standard risk; “mono_clone,” just one leukemic clone in the diagnostic sample; “poly_clone,” two or more leukemic clones in the diagnostic sample.
The frequency of leukemic clones in DNA and RNA of the same bone marrow samples.
| Patients | Leukemic clone ID | Leukemic clones frequency in DNA (%) | Leukemic clones frequency in RNA (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| P001 | P001B | 35.79 | 10.94 |
| P001A | 15.42 | 4.30 | |
| P001D | 14.82 | 3.07 | |
| P001C | 14.80 | 4.59 | |
| P005 | P005 | 84.56 | 34.53 |
| P006 | P006 | 78.62 | 30.36 |
| P007 | P007A | 45.52 | 27.39 |
| P007B | 40.96 | 1.16 | |
| P008 | P008 | 90.87 | 20.19 |
| P013 | P013 | 25.12 | 11.79 |
| P011 | P011A | 62.80 | 32.14 |
| P011B | 18.44 | 0.82 | |
| P015 | |||
| P009 |
Underline in the clone frequency means those clones with correct ORF.
Figure 2Comparison of MRD results detected by high throughput sequencing (HTS) with flow cytometry (FCM) assays. The samples were classified into three subsets: (1) MRD was detected positive by both HTS and FCM (left); (2) MRD were detected positive by HTS, but negative by FCM (middle); and (3) MRD was detected negative by both methods (right).
Figure 3Comparison leukemic clone frequency between bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) specimens for diagnostic (A) and follow-up (B) samples. Values in the up left in (B) represent the number of samples in each quadrant.
Figure 4The evolved clones in pre-treatment and post-treatment bone marrow (BM) samples. (A,B) The number of evolved clones in pre-treatment (A) and follow-up (B) BM samples. Different colors indicate different relative position (green for upstream, orange for downstream, and blue for uncertain) for the evolved clonotypes compared to the leukemic clones. (C,D) The correlation between the leukemic clonal frequencies and the evolved clones in pre-treatment (C) and post-treatment (D) samples. The size of the point indicates the unique number of evolved clones from each leukemic clone, and colors in (D) indicated the time of BM obtained after the beginning of chemotherapy.
Figure 5Comparison of evolved clones in PB and BM. (A) The number of evolved clonotypes identified in PB and BM of the same samples. “#” in the X-axis indicates follow-up samples. (B) The total frequency of evolved clones in PB and BM of the same samples. Brown triangles indicate follow-up samples.