| Literature DB >> 27756202 |
Deepti Varshney1, Akanksha Jaiswar1, Alok Adholeya1, Pushplata Prasad2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subtilisin-like serine proteases or Subtilases in fungi are important for penetration and colonization of host. In Hypocreales, these proteins share several properties with other fungal, bacterial, plant and mammalian homologs. However, adoption of specific roles in entomopathogenesis may be governed by attainment of unique biochemical and structural features during the evolutionary course. Due to such functional shifts Subtilases coded by different family members of Hypocreales acquire distinct features according to respective hosts and lifestyle. We conducted phylogenetic and DIVERGE analyses and identified important protein residues that putatively assign functional specificity to Subtilases in fungal families/species under the order Hypocreales.Entities:
Keywords: Conserved motif analysis; Gene tree; Natural selection; P. lilacinum; Phylogenetic analysis; Protein structure modeling; Species tree; Subtilisin like serine proteases; Type I functional divergence; Type II functional divergence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27756202 PMCID: PMC5069783 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0793-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Phylogenetic relationships among protein sequences belonging to the Subtilisin (S08.005) family. The numbers indicate the Bootstrap values for each branch
Fig. 2Phylogenetic relationships among protein sequences belonging to the Proteinase K (S08.054) family. The numbers indicate the Bootstrap values for each branch
Fig. 3Reconciliation of Subtilisin (S08.005) gene tree with species tree by NOTUNG. a Gene tree showing duplications (red boxes and D's) and losses (grey), (b) Distribution of Subtilisin (S08.005) gene gains/losses among 10 Hypocreales species
Fig. 4Reconciliation of Proteinase K (S08.054) gene tree with species tree by NOTUNG. a Gene tree showing duplications (red boxes and D's) and losses (grey), (b) Distribution of Proteinase K (S08.054) gene gains/losses among 10 Hypocreales species
Fig. 5Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation (MEME) analysis for identification of functional motifs among Subtilisin S08.005 protein sequences in Hypocreales
Fig. 6Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation (MEME) analysis for identification of functional motifs among Proteinase K (S08.054) protein sequences in Hypocreales
Likelihood estimates of Subtilisin (S08.005) gene family for site models in PAML
| Model | np | Parameter estimates (Proportion p, omega ω) | lnL | LRT pairs | df | 2ΔlnL |
| Positively selected sites (BEB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| site model | ||||||||
| M0:one ratio | 106 |
| −28649.08 | M0/M3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | |
| Model M3:Discrete | 110 |
| −28649.08 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ω 0 = 0.00000 | ||||||||
| ω1 = 0.00000 | ||||||||
| ω2 = 0.13223 | ||||||||
| M1a(neutral) | 107 |
| −30002.75 | M1a/M2a | 2 | 86.44 |
| |
|
| ||||||||
| ω0 = 0.00001 | ||||||||
| ω1 = 1.00000 | ||||||||
| Model 2a: Positive Selection | 109 |
| −29959.53 | 4D*,5Q*,160S*,187G* | ||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ω 0 = 0.00000 | ||||||||
| ω1 = 1.00000 | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Model 7: beta | 107 |
| −28245.05 | M7/M8 | 2 | 3515.4 |
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Model 8 : | 109 |
| −30002.75 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ω = 1.00000 | ||||||||
Selection analysis by site models. np: number of free parameters. lnL: log likelihood. LRT: likelihood ratio test. df: degrees of freedom. 2∆lnL: twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared. The significant tests at 95 % cut off are labeled with*. Bold: P < 0.05
Likelihood estimates of Subtilisin (S08.005) gene family for branch-site models in PAML
| Branch-Site (Model) | np | Parameter estimates (Proportion p, omega ω) | lnL | LRT Pairs | 2ΔlnL | df |
| Positively selected sites (BEB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nectriaceae (BSfix ω =1) | 108 |
| −28503.14 | BSfix ω =1/ BSfix ω =0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Nectriaceae (BSfix ω =0) | 109 |
| −28503.14 | |||||
| Cordycipitaceae /Clavicipitaceae (BSfix ω =1) | 108 |
| −28503.00 | BSfix ω =1/BSfix ω =0 | 0.034 | 1 | 0.85 | |
| Cordycipitaceae/Clavicipitaceae (BSfix ω =0) | 109 |
| −28502.99 | |||||
| Ophiocordycipitaceae (BSfix ω =1) | 108 |
| −28501.50 | BSfix ω =1/BSfix ω =0 | 10.64 | 1 |
| |
| Ophiocordycipitaceae (BSfix ω =0) | 109 |
| −28496.18 |
Selection analysis by branch-site models. BS: branch-site. lnL: log likelihood. LRT: likelihood ratio test. df: degrees of freedom. 2∆lnL: twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared. Bold: P < 0.05
Likelihood estimates of Proteinase K (S08.054) gene family for site models in PAML
| Model | np | Parameter estimates (Proportion p, omega ω) | lnL | LRT pairs | Df | 2ΔlnL |
| Positively selected sites (BEB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| site model | ||||||||
| M0:one ratio | 116 |
| −19267.73 | M0/M3 | 4 | 1537 |
| |
| Model M3:Discrete | 120 |
| −18499.23 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ω0 = 0.01542 | ||||||||
| ω1 = 0.08491 | ||||||||
| ω2 = 0.31104 | ||||||||
| M1a(neutral) | 117 |
| −18857.30 | M1a/M2a | 2 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| ||||||||
| ω0 = 0.12388 | ||||||||
| ω1 = 1.00000 | ||||||||
| Model 2a: Positive Selection | 119 |
| −18857.30 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ω0 = 0.12388 | ||||||||
| ω1 = 1.00000 | ||||||||
| ω2 = 1.00000 | ||||||||
| Model 7: beta | 117 |
| −18473.64 | M7/M8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Model 8 : | 119 |
| −18473.64 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| ω = 1.00000 | ||||||||
Selection analysis by site models. np: number of free parameters. lnL: log likelihood. LRT: likelihood ratio test. df: degrees of freedom. 2∆lnL: twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared. Bold: P < 0.05
Likelihood estimates of Proteinase K (S08.054) gene family for branch-site models in PAML
| Branch- Site (Model) | np | Parameter estimates (Proportion p, omega ω) | lnL | LRT Pairs | 2Δ lnL | df |
| Positively selected sites (BEB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nectriaceae (BSfix ω =1) | 118 |
| −18857.30 | BSfix ω =1/ BSfix ω =0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Nectriaceae (BSfix ω =0) | 119 |
| −18857.30 | |||||
| Cordycipitaceae/Clavicipitaceae (BSfix ω =1) | 118 |
| −18857.30 | BSfix ω =1/BSfix ω =0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Cordycipitaceae/Clavicipitaceae (BSfix ω =0) | 119 |
| −18857.30 | |||||
| Ophiocordycipitaceae (BSfix ω =1) | 118 |
| −18849.02 | BSfix ω =1/ BSfix ω =0 | 2.04 | 1 | 0.15 | |
| Ophiocordycipitaceae (BSfix ω =0) | 119 |
| −18848.00 | 69 S*, 103 I* |
Selection analysis by branch-site models. BS: branch-site. lnL: log likelihood. LRT: likelihood ratio test. df: degrees of freedom. 2∆lnL: twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared. The significant tests at 95 % cut off are labeled with*. Bold: P < 0.05
Divergence analysis among Subtilisin (S08.005) genes in Hypocreales. Functional divergence estimates of type I and type II of two clusters comparison are shown
| Functional Divergence type I | |||
| Clades | Nectriaceae vs. Cordycipitaceae/Clavicipitaceae | Nectriaceae vs. Ophiocordycipitaceae | Ophiocordycipitaceae vs. Cordycipitaceae/ Clavicipitaceae |
| Subtilisin (S08.005) | |||
| θml | 0.9992 | 0.9992 | 0.1432 |
| SE θ | 0.079892 | 0.075343 | 0.069332 |
| LRT θ | 156.423961 | 175.881442 | 4.266 |
| Cut off | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.50 |
| Sites | 166 sites | 166 sites | 2 sites |
| Proteinase K (S08.054) | No Divergence | ||
| Functional Divergence type II | |||
| Clades | Nectriaceae vs. Cordycipitaceae/ Clavicipitaceae | Nectriaceae vs. Ophiocordycipitaceae | Ophiocordycipitaceae vs. Cordycipitaceae/Clavicipitaceae |
| Subtilisin (S08.005) | |||
| aC | 41 | 45 | 29 |
| bR | 68 | 57 | 48 |
| θII | 0.64815 | 0.576089 | −0.162629 |
| SE θ | 0.07596 | 0.074653 | 0.286306 |
| cAr | 0.630576 | 0.58723 | −0.380073 |
| dPlr | 0.31213 | 0.31213 | 0.31213 |
| Posterior Ratio (R) | 2.03 | 1.87 | −1.21 |
| Sites | 109 sites | 102 sites | No Divergence |
aC: Number of sites with conserved change between two clusters
b R: Number of sites with radical change between two clusters
cAr: Proportion of radical changes under F2-state (type-II functional divergence)
dPIr: Proportion of radical (πR) changes under F0-state (no functional divergence)
Fig. 7Functional divergence in Subtilisin (S08.005) protein sequences. a Subtilisin structure of a member (fx|XP5977|Fusarium oxysporum) of the “Nectriaceae” clade is shown. The amino acid residues that experienced site-specific rate shift (RVS) and/or type II divergence and fell into the catalytic triad/active sites/substrate binding sites of the enzyme are highlighted. The catalytic triad is shown by a triangle (brown colour). Predicted active sites are shown in yellow colour; substrate binding sites are shown in blue colour. Amino acids highlighted in brown colour experienced type-II divergence and was present in an active site and a binding site. b Subtilisin structure of a member (bb|XP2612|Beauveria bassiana) of the “Cordycipitaceae/Clavicipitaceae” clade is shown. The amino acids residues that experienced site-specific rate shift (RVS) and/or type II divergence and fell into the catalytic triad/active sites/substrate binding sites of the enzyme are highlighted. Predicted catalytic triad is shown by a triangle (red in colour); Active sites in cyan colour, Substrate binding sites in magenta colour. Amino acid highlighted in red experienced both RVS and type-II divergence and was present in one of the active sites. c Subtilisin structure of a member (pl|XP5939|Purpureocillium lilacinum) of the “Ophiocordycipitaceae” clade is shown. The amino acids residues that experienced site-specific rate shift (RVS) and/or type II divergence and fell into the catalytic triad/active sites/substrate binding sites of the enzyme are highlighted. Predicted catalytic triad is shown by a triangle (black in colour); Active sites in yellow colour, Substrate binding sites in magenta colour. Amino acid highlighted in black experienced type-II divergence and was present in one of the active sites