Literature DB >> 27755712

Season and landscape composition affect pollen foraging distances and habitat use of honey bees.

Nadja Danner1, Anna Maria Molitor2, Susanne Schiele2, Stephan Härtel2, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter2.   

Abstract

Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) show a large variation in foraging distances and use a broad range of plant species as pollen resources, even in regions with intensive agriculture. However, it is unknown how increasing areas of mass-flowering crops like oilseed rape (Brassica napus; OSR) or a decrease of seminatural habitats (SNH) change the temporal and spatial availability of pollen resources for honey bee colonies, and thus foraging distances and frequency in different habitat types. We studied pollen foraging of honey bee colonies in 16 agricultural landscapes with independent gradients of OSR and SNH area within 2 km and used waggle dances and digital geographic maps with major land cover types to reveal the distance and visited habitat type on a landscape level. Mean pollen foraging distance of 1347 decoded bee dances was 1015 m (± 26 m; SEM). In spring, increasing area of flowering OSR within 2 km reduced mean pollen foraging distances from 1324 m to only 435 m. In summer, increasing cover of SNH areas close to the colonies (within 200 m radius) reduced mean pollen foraging distances from 846 to 469 m. Frequency of pollen foragers per habitat type, measured as the number of dances per hour and hectare, was equally high for SNH, grassland, and OSR fields, but lower for other crops and forests. In landscapes with a small proportion of SNH a significantly higher density of pollen foragers on SNH was observed, indicating that pollen resources in such simple agricultural landscapes are more limited. Overall, we conclude that SNH and mass-flowering crops can reduce foraging distances of honey bee colonies at different scales and seasons with possible benefits for the performance of honey bee colonies. Further, mixed agricultural landscapes with a high proportion of SNH reduce foraging densities of honey bees in SNH and thus possible competition for pollen resources.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Brassica napuszzm321990; Apis mellifera L.; Land use intensification; oilseed rape; pollination; resource competition; seminatural habitat

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27755712     DOI: 10.1890/15-1840.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  16 in total

1.  Scale-Dependent Waylaying Effect of Pollinators and Pollination of Mass-Flowering Plants.

Authors:  Z X Lu; Z H Xie; J W Zhao; Y Q Chen
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 1.434

2.  Predicting population responses to environmental change from individual-level mechanisms: towards a standardized mechanistic approach.

Authors:  A S A Johnston; R J Boyd; J W Watson; A Paul; L C Evans; E L Gardner; V L Boult
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Thermal efficiency extends distance and variety for honeybee foragers: analysis of the energetics of nectar collection and desiccation by Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Derek Mitchell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Mass-flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe.

Authors:  Andrea Holzschuh; Matteo Dainese; Juan P González-Varo; Sonja Mudri-Stojnić; Verena Riedinger; Maj Rundlöf; Jeroen Scheper; Jennifer B Wickens; Victoria J Wickens; Riccardo Bommarco; David Kleijn; Simon G Potts; Stuart P M Roberts; Henrik G Smith; Montserrat Vilà; Ante Vujić; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Combined effects of waggle dance communication and landscape heterogeneity on nectar and pollen uptake in honey bee colonies.

Authors:  Fabian Nürnberger; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Stephan Härtel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  High-resolution maps of Swiss apiaries and their applicability to study spatial distribution of bacterial honey bee brood diseases.

Authors:  Raphael S von Büren; Bernadette Oehen; Nikolaus J Kuhn; Silvio Erler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Analyzing the Dietary Diary of Bumble Bee.

Authors:  Robert M Leidenfrost; Svenja Bänsch; Lisa Prudnikow; Bertram Brenig; Catrin Westphal; Röbbe Wünschiers
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Honey bee foraging ecology: Season but not landscape diversity shapes the amount and diversity of collected pollen.

Authors:  Nadja Danner; Alexander Keller; Stephan Härtel; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The neglected bee trees: European beech forests as a home for feral honey bee colonies.

Authors:  Patrick Laurenz Kohl; Benjamin Rutschmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  A DNA barcoding method for identifying and quantifying the composition of pollen species collected by European honeybees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  Tsunashi Kamo; Yoshinobu Kusumoto; Yoshinori Tokuoka; Satoru Okubo; Hiroshi Hayakawa; Mikio Yoshiyama; Kiyoshi Kimura; Akihiro Konuma
Journal:  Appl Entomol Zool       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.403

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.