Literature DB >> 27755676

Modifying Scent-Marking Behavior to Reduce Woodchuck Damage to Fruit Trees.

Robert K Swihart.   

Abstract

Woodchucks (Marmota monax) damage fruit trees by gnawing on main stems during scent marking, a behavior unrelated to feeding. I tested whether damage could be reduced by providing alternative sites for scent marking or by applying predator odor to trees. Nearly all hardwood stakes supplied as alternative sites for scent marking were used, and the elapsed time from activation of a burrow until onset of damage to an adjacent tree was significantly greater for sites with stakes. However, the mean level of damage to trees was not significantly reduced. Impregnating hardwood stakes with sodium chloride increased their use as gnawing sites relative to untreated stakes, presumably due to dietary sodium deficits incurred by woodchucks during spring. Use of NaCl-treated stakes did not reduce damage to adjacent trees, however. Application of a predator odor, bobcat urine, as a topical spray reduced mean levels of gnawing by 98.3% relative to untreated trees, and placement of bobcat urine in capillary tubes at the bases of trees also resulted in significant reductions in damage over a 3-mo period. © 1991 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 27755676     DOI: 10.2307/1941851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Aversive responses of white-tailed deer,Odocoileus virginianus, to predator urines.

Authors:  R K Swihart; J J Pignatello; M J Mattina
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Identification of volatile components of bobcat (Lynx rufus) urine.

Authors:  M J Mattina; J J Pignatello; R K Swihart
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Effects of mongoose odors on rat capture success.

Authors:  M E Tobin; R M Engeman; R T Sugihara
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Why are predator urines aversive to prey?

Authors:  D L Nolte; J R Mason; G Epple; E Aronov; D L Campbell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Do herbivores eavesdrop on ant chemical communication to avoid predation?

Authors:  David J Gonthier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.