Literature DB >> 27753206

A Comparison of Request Process and Outcomes in Donation After Cardiac Death and Donation After Brain Death: Results From a National Study.

L A Siminoff1, G P Alolod1, M Wilson-Genderson1, E Y N Yuen1, H M Traino1.   

Abstract

Available literature points to healthcare providers' discomfort with donation after cardiac death (DCD) and their perception of public reluctance toward the procedure. Using a national sample, we report on the communication content of actual DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) approaches by organ procurement organization (OPO) requesters and compare family decision makers' (FDMs') experiences of both modalities. We recruited 1601 FDMs using a validated protocol; 347 (21.7%) were of potential DCD donors. Semistructured telephone interviews yielded FDMs' sociodemographic data, donation attitudes, assessment of approach, final outcomes, and substantiating reasons. Initial analysis consisted of bivariate analyses. Multilevel mixture models compared groups representing authorization outcome and DCD/DBD status. No significant differences in family authorization were found between DCD and DBD cases. Statistically significant associations were found between sociodemographic characteristics and authorization, with white FDMs more likely to authorize DCD or DBD than black FDMs. FDMs of both modalities had similar evaluations of requester skills, topics discussed, satisfaction, and refusal reasons. The findings suggest that the DCD/DBD distinction may not be notable to families. We recommend the use of similar approach strategies and communication skills and the development of education campaigns about the public's acceptance of DCD.
© 2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  donors and donation: deceased; donors and donation: donation after circulatory death (DCD); education; ethics and public policy; health services and outcomes research; organ procurement; organ procurement and allocation; organ procurement organization; physician education; social sciences

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27753206      PMCID: PMC5395358          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  36 in total

1.  Public policy, public opinion, and consent for organ donation.

Authors:  L A Siminoff; M B Mercer
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The process of organ donation and its effect on consent.

Authors:  L A Siminoff; R M Arnold; J Hewlett
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Communicating Effectively about Organ Donation: A Randomized Trial of a Behavioral Communication Intervention to Improve Discussions about Donation.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather M Traino; Maureen Wilson Genderson
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2015-03

4.  Non-heart beating organ donation: old procurement strategy--new ethical problems.

Authors:  M D D Bell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Procuring organs from a non-heart-beating cadaver: a case report.

Authors:  M A DeVita; R Vukmir; J V Snyder; C Graziano
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1993-12

6.  Attitudes of the American public toward organ donation after uncontrolled (sudden) cardiac death.

Authors:  M L Volk; G J W Warren; R R Anspach; M P Couper; R M Merion; P A Ubel
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  National evaluation of healthcare provider attitudes toward organ donation after cardiac death.

Authors:  M Susan Mandell; Stacy Zamudio; Debbie Seem; Lin J McGaw; Geri Wood; Patricia Liehr; Angela Ethier; Anthony M D'Alessandro
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  ASTS recommended practice guidelines for controlled donation after cardiac death organ procurement and transplantation.

Authors:  D J Reich; D C Mulligan; P L Abt; T L Pruett; M M I Abecassis; A D'Alessandro; E A Pomfret; R B Freeman; J F Markmann; D W Hanto; A J Matas; J P Roberts; R M Merion; G B G Klintmalm
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  The reasons families donate organs for transplantation: implications for policy and practice.

Authors:  Laura Siminoff; Mary Beth Mercer; Gregory Graham; Christopher Burant
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-04

10.  Families' understanding of brain death.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Mary Beth Mercer; Robert Arnold
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.065

View more
  5 in total

1.  Harms of unsuccessful donation after circulatory death: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Anne Buffington; Joseph R Scalea; Norman Fost; Kenneth D Croes; Joshua D Mezrich; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Organ donation in Korea in 2018 and an introduction of the Korea national organ donation system.

Authors:  Won-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Korean J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-31

Review 3.  A novel approach to studying co-evolution of understanding and research: Family bereavement and the potential for organ donation as a case study.

Authors:  Sean G Dicks; Kristen Ranse; Holly Northam; Frank Mp van Haren; Douglas P Boer
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2018-01-24

Review 4.  The development of a narrative describing the bereavement of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sean Glenton Dicks; Kristen Ranse; Holly Northam; Douglas P Boer; Frank Mp van Haren
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2017-12-05

Review 5.  An Integrated Psychosocial Model of Relatives' Decision About Deceased Organ Donation (IMROD): Joining Pieces of the Puzzle.

Authors:  Jorge S López; Maria Soria-Oliver; Begoña Aramayona; Rubén García-Sánchez; José M Martínez; María J Martín
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.