Literature DB >> 27753022

Implementing Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPD) in a National Health Service Laboratory; From Dominant to Recessive Disorders.

Suzanne Drury1,2, Sarah Mason3, Fiona McKay3, Kitty Lo4, Christopher Boustred3,5, Lucy Jenkins3, Lyn S Chitty3,5.   

Abstract

Our UK National Health Service regional genetics laboratory offers NIPD for autosomal dominant and de novo conditions (achondroplasia, thanataphoric dysplasia, Apert syndrome), paternal mutation exclusion for cystic fibrosis and a range of bespoke tests. NIPD avoids the risks associated with invasive testing, making prenatal diagnosis more accessible to families at high genetic risk. However, the challenge remains in offering definitive diagnosis for autosomal recessive diseases, which is complicated by the predominance of the maternal mutant allele in the cell-free DNA sample and thus requires a variety of different approaches. Validation and diagnostic implementation for NIPD of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is further complicated by presence of a pseudogene that requires a different approach. We have used an assay targeting approximately 6700 heterozygous SNPs around the CAH gene (CYP21A2) to construct the high-risk parental haplotypes and tested this approach in five cases, showing that inheritance of the parental alleles can be correctly identified using NIPD. We are evaluating various measures of the fetal fraction to help determine inheritance of parental mutations. We are currently exploring the utility of an NIPD multi-disorder panel for autosomal recessive disease, to make testing more widely applicable to families with a variety of serious genetic conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell free DNA; Fetal; Monogenic disorders; Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27753022     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42044-8_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  11 in total

1.  The fetus in the age of the genome.

Authors:  Dagmar Schmitz; Wolfram Henn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.881

Review 2.  The current and future impact of genome-wide sequencing on fetal precision medicine.

Authors:  Riwa Sabbagh; Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Sunayna Best; Karen Wou; Neeta Vora; Ignatia B Van der Veyver; Ronald Wapner; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis based on cell-free DNA for tuberous sclerosis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Yang; Yan Meng; Yang-Yang Wang; Yan-Ping Lu; Qiu-Hong Wang; Yan-Qin You; Xiao-Xiao Xie; Ling Bai; Nan Fang; Li-Ping Zou
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.473

5.  Sensitive Monogenic Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis by Targeted Haplotyping.

Authors:  Carlo Vermeulen; Geert Geeven; Elzo de Wit; Marjon J A M Verstegen; Rumo P M Jansen; Melissa van Kranenburg; Ewart de Bruijn; Sara L Pulit; Evelien Kruisselbrink; Zahra Shahsavari; Davood Omrani; Fatemeh Zeinali; Hossein Najmabadi; Theodora Katsila; Christina Vrettou; George P Patrinos; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos; Erik Splinter; Jeffrey M Beekman; Sima Kheradmand Kia; Gerard J Te Meerman; Hans Kristian Ploos van Amstel; Wouter de Laat
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Targeted fetal cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidies in 4,594 pregnancies: Single center study.

Authors:  Altug Koc; Ozge Ozer Kaya; Berk Ozyilmaz; Yasar B Kutbay; Ozgur Kirbiyik; Taha R Ozdemir; Kadri M Erdogan; Merve Saka Guvenc; Deniz C Oztekin; Mehmet Ozeren; Halil G Pala; Atalay Ekin; Cenk Gezer; Alkim G Sahingoz Yildirim; Bahar Konuralp Atakul; Secil Kurtulmus; Ugur Turhan; Cuneyt E Taner
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  Eliciting women's preference for prenatal testing in China: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Liangzhi Wu; Yanxin Wu; Shiqian Zou; Cong Sun; Junyu Chen; Xueyan Li; Zihang Lin; Lizhi Guan; Qing Zeng; Sihan Zhao; Jingtong Liang; Rui Chen; Zhiwen Hu; Kingyan Au; Daipeng Xie; Xiaomin Xiao; Wai-Kit Ming
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders based on direct haplotype phasing through targeted linked-read sequencing.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Min Chen; Yaping Zhu; Lu Jiang; Jia Li; Yaoshen Wang; Zhe Lu; Fengyu Guo; Hairong Wang; Zhiyu Peng; Yun Yang; Jun Sun
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 9.  Trophoblast retrieval and isolation from the cervix: origins of cervical trophoblasts and their potential value for risk assessment of ongoing pregnancies.

Authors:  Gerit Moser; Sascha Drewlo; Berthold Huppertz; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.