| Literature DB >> 27752500 |
Sun-Ae Kang1, Dong-Hee Kim2, Shin-Hyub Hong3, Hye-Jin Park3, Na-Hyun Kim3, Dong-Hyun Ahn4, Bong-Jeun An5, Joong-Ho Kwon6, Young-Je Cho6.
Abstract
In this study, we compared the anti-inflammatory activity of Pinus koraiensis cone bark extracts prepared by conventional extraction and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). Water extracts and 50% ethanol extracts prepared using MAE were applied to RAW 264.7 cell at 5, 10, 25, and 50 μg/mL of concentrations, and tested for cytoxicity. The group treated with 50 μg/mL of 50% ethanol extracts showed toxicity. In order to investigate the inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW 264.7 cells, extracts of water and ethanol were treated with 5, 10, and 25 μg/mL concentrations. The inhibitory activity of water and 50% ethanol extracts groups were determined as 40% and 60% at 25 μg/mL concentration, respectively. We found concentration dependent decreases on inducible NO synthase. The inhibitory effect against forming inflammatory cytokines, prostaglandin E2, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β, was also superior in the 25 μg/mL treated group than the control group. According to these results, the water extracts and 50% ethanol extracts both inhibited inflammatory mediators by reducing the inflammatory response. Therefore, The MAE extracts of P. koraiensis cone bark can be developed as a functional ingredient with anti-inflammatory activity.Entities:
Keywords: Pinus koraiensis; anti-inflammation; cone bark; extracts; micro-wave
Year: 2016 PMID: 27752500 PMCID: PMC5063209 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2016.21.3.236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Total phenolic contents and hyaluronidase inhibitory activity of extracts from Pinus koraiensis cone bark depending on different conditions of extraction
| Extraction type | Extraction solvent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Water | Ethanol | ||
| Total phenolic contents (mg/g) | CE | 4.37±2.06a | 5.67±0.03a |
| MAE | 5.51±0.14b | 9.84±0.05b | |
| Hyaluronidase inhibition (%) | CE | 13.55±1.41a | 26.96±2.66a |
| MAE | 34.20±1.20b | 42.06±0.03b | |
Mean±standard deviation (n=6).
Means with different letters (a,b) within column are significantly different at P<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range tests.
CE, conventional extraction; MAE, microwave-assisted extraction.
Fig. 1Effect of Pinus koraiensis cone bark water extract (A) and ethanol extract (B) on RAW 264.7 cell viability. Different letters (a–e) above the bars indicate statistically different (P<0.05).
Fig. 2Inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) production by Pinus koraiensis cone bark water extract (A) and ethanol extract (B) on RAW 264.7 cells. Different letters (a–e) above the bars indicate statistically different (P<0.05).
Fig. 3Effect of Pinus koraiensis cone bark extracts on inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 protein expression in RAW 264.7. RAW 264.7 cells cultured in serum-free medium for 1 h were treated with 5, 10, or 25 μg/mL of P. koraiensis cone bark extracts for 24 h. iNOS expression was determined using the Western blot analysis. The histograms show the results of densitometric analysis of iNOS protein expression normalized to β-actin. Pinus koraiensis cone bark water extract (A) and ethanol extract (B) on iNOS, and water extract (C) and ethanol extract (D) on COX-2. Different letters (a–e) above the bars indicate statistically different (P<0.05).
Fig. 4Inhibition rate of extracts from Pinus koraiensis corn bark. RAW 264.7 cells were incubated with various concentration (5, 10, and 25 μg/mL) of Pinus koraiensis extracts for 1 h and then treated with 1 μg/mL of lipopolysaccharide for 24 h. (A) prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), (C) tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, (E) interleukin (IL)-6, and (G) IL-1β in water extracts, (B) PGE2, (D) TNF-α, (F) IL-6, and (H) IL-1β in ethanol extracts. Different letters (a–e) above the bars indicate statistically different (P<0.05).