Literature DB >> 27751661

A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.

Christopher R Watts1, Shaheen N Awan2, Youri Maryn3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship and reliability of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) measures from two acoustic software applications, Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) and Praat.
METHODOLOGY: Flemish and English recordings of sustained vowels and connected speech samples were analyzed using ADSV and Praat. Correlational analyses and measures of the standard error of the estimate were applied to the vowel and connected speech data obtained from the two programs.
RESULTS: Analyses revealed very strong relationships (eg, r > 0.88) between CPP measures derived from ADSV and those derived from Praat, regardless of context (vowel or connected speech) or language spoken. Average residual errors ranged from 0.55 to 1.1 dB for the prediction of Praat CPP data from actual observed ADSV CPP data, and average residual errors ranged from 0.57 to 1.58 dB for the prediction of ADSV CPP data from actual observed Praat CPP data.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of CPP derived from ADSV and Praat manifested strong parallel-forms reliability. Although CPP data values obtained via these programs will be different owing to algorithmic processing differences, this study found that estimated CPP values derived using regression equations could be transformed between programs with relatively small predictive error, regardless of language. The strong measurement relationships indicate that CPP values from either program have a high degree of shared variance and may be expected to differentiate across a wide range of voice signal periodicity in a relatively similar fashion. This finding supports the use of either program in clinical use and voice science research.
Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice; Cepstral peak prominence; Cepstrum; Praat; Voice disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27751661     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  12 in total

1.  Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Co-Occurrence of Hypernasality and Voice Impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Acoustic Quantification.

Authors:  Marziye Eshghi; Kathryn P Connaghan; Sarah E Gutz; James D Berry; Yana Yunusova; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  An exploratory model of speech intelligibility for healthy aging based on phonatory and articulatory measures.

Authors:  Mili Kuruvilla-Dugdale; Maria Dietrich; Jacob D McKinley; Chelsea Deroche
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Meike Brockmann-Bauser; Jarrad H Van Stan; Marilia Carvalho Sampaio; Joerg E Bohlender; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Manuel Díaz Cádiz; Kathleen F Nagle; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Effects of Laryngeal Vibratory Asymmetry and Neuromuscular Compensation on Voice Quality.

Authors:  Pranati Pillutla; Zhaoyan Zhang; Jody Kreiman; Holly Wilhalme; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Fold Vibratory Asymmetry.

Authors:  Shaghauyegh S Azar; Pranati Pillutla; Lauran K Evans; Zhaoyan Zhang; Jody Kreiman; Dinesh K Chhetri
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.970

9.  An Assessment of Different Praat Versions for Acoustic Measures Analyzed Automatically by VoiceEvalU8 and Manually by Two Raters.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Jeremy Wolfberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Hey Siri: How Effective are Common Voice Recognition Systems at Recognizing Dysphonic Voices?

Authors:  Matthew L Rohlfing; Daniel P Buckley; Jacquelyn Piraquive; Cara E Stepp; Lauren F Tracy
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 2.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.