Pranati Pillutla1, Zhaoyan Zhang1, Jody Kreiman1,2, Holly Wilhalme3, Dinesh K Chhetri1. 1. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. 2. Department of Linguistics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. 3. Department of Medicine, Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Vibratory asymmetry and neuromuscular compensation are often seen in laryngeal neuromuscular pathology. However, the ramifications of these findings on voice quality are unclear. This study investigated the effects of varying levels of vibratory asymmetry and neuromuscular compensation on cepstral peak prominence (CPP), an analog of voice quality. STUDY DESIGN: In vivo canine phonation model. METHODS: Varying degrees of vocal fold vibratory asymmetry were achieved by stimulating one recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) over 11 levels from threshold to maximal muscle activation. For each of these levels, phonation was induced at systematically varied combinations of neuromuscular compensation: three levels each of contralateral RLN stimulation (80%, 90%, and 100% of maximal), superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) activation (0%, 50%, and 100% of maximal), and airflow levels (500, 700, and 900 mL/s). Vocal fold symmetry was determined by assessing the opening phase of the vibratory cycle in high-speed video recordings. Voice quality was estimated acoustically by calculating CPP for each voice sample. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-two phonatory conditions with varying degrees of vibratory asymmetry were evaluated. CPP was highest at vibratory symmetry. Increasing levels of asymmetry resulted in significant decreases in CPP. CPP increased significantly with increasing contralateral RLN activation. CPP was significantly higher at 50% SLN activation than 0% or 100% SLN activation. CONCLUSION: Voice quality, as approximated by CPP, is best at vibratory symmetry and deteriorates with increasing degrees of asymmetry. Voice quality may be improved with neuromuscular compensation by increased adduction of the contralateral vocal fold or increased vocal fold tension at mid-levels of SLN activation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA, Basic Science Laryngoscope, 132:130-134, 2022.
INTRODUCTION: Vibratory asymmetry and neuromuscular compensation are often seen in laryngeal neuromuscular pathology. However, the ramifications of these findings on voice quality are unclear. This study investigated the effects of varying levels of vibratory asymmetry and neuromuscular compensation on cepstral peak prominence (CPP), an analog of voice quality. STUDY DESIGN: In vivo canine phonation model. METHODS: Varying degrees of vocal fold vibratory asymmetry were achieved by stimulating one recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) over 11 levels from threshold to maximal muscle activation. For each of these levels, phonation was induced at systematically varied combinations of neuromuscular compensation: three levels each of contralateral RLN stimulation (80%, 90%, and 100% of maximal), superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) activation (0%, 50%, and 100% of maximal), and airflow levels (500, 700, and 900 mL/s). Vocal fold symmetry was determined by assessing the opening phase of the vibratory cycle in high-speed video recordings. Voice quality was estimated acoustically by calculating CPP for each voice sample. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-two phonatory conditions with varying degrees of vibratory asymmetry were evaluated. CPP was highest at vibratory symmetry. Increasing levels of asymmetry resulted in significant decreases in CPP. CPP increased significantly with increasing contralateral RLN activation. CPP was significantly higher at 50% SLN activation than 0% or 100% SLN activation. CONCLUSION: Voice quality, as approximated by CPP, is best at vibratory symmetry and deteriorates with increasing degrees of asymmetry. Voice quality may be improved with neuromuscular compensation by increased adduction of the contralateral vocal fold or increased vocal fold tension at mid-levels of SLN activation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA, Basic Science Laryngoscope, 132:130-134, 2022.
Authors: Dinesh K Chhetri; Juergen Neubauer; Jennifer L Bergeron; Elazar Sofer; Kevin A Peng; Nausheen Jamal Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 3.325