| Literature DB >> 27748516 |
Ines Westphal1,2, Claudia Jedelhauser1, Gregor Liebsch3, Arnd Wilhelmi4, Attila Aszodi1, Matthias Schieker1,2.
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering (BTE) utilizing biomaterial scaffolds and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) is a promising approach for the treatment of bone defects. The quality of engineered tissue is crucially affected by numerous parameters including cell density and the oxygen supply. In this study, a novel oxygen-imaging sensor was introduced to monitor the oxygen distribution in three dimensional (3D) scaffolds in order to analyze a new cell-seeding strategy. Immortalized hMSCs, pre-cultured in a monolayer for 30-40% or 70-80% confluence, were used to seed demineralized bone matrix (DBM) scaffolds. Real-time measurements of oxygen consumption in vitro were simultaneously performed by the novel planar sensor and a conventional needle-type sensor over 24 h. Recorded oxygen maps of the novel planar sensor revealed that scaffolds, seeded with hMSCs harvested at lower densities (30-40% confluence), exhibited rapid exponential oxygen consumption profile. In contrast, harvesting cells at higher densities (70-80% confluence) resulted in a very slow, almost linear, oxygen decrease due to gradual achieving the stationary growth phase. In conclusion, it could be shown that not only the seeding density on a scaffold, but also the cell density at the time point of harvest is of major importance for BTE. The new cell seeding strategy of harvested MSCs at low density during its log phase could be a useful strategy for an early in vivo implantation of cell-seeded scaffolds after a shorter in vitro culture period. Furthermore, the novel oxygen imaging sensor enables a continuous, two-dimensional, quick and convenient to handle oxygen mapping for the development and optimization of tissue engineered scaffolds. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 894-902.Entities:
Keywords: 3D scaffolds; bone tissue engineering; cell density; mesenchymal stem cells; oxygen measurement; time point of harvest
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27748516 PMCID: PMC6084321 DOI: 10.1002/bit.26202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng ISSN: 0006-3592 Impact factor: 4.530
Figure 1Experimental set‐up of oxygen mapping. Original set‐up is shown in (A) and as schematic representation in (B). The chemical sensor foil for oxygen detection was placed under the scaffold, whereas the portable fluorescence detector was installed directly underneath the well. To compare and validate the novel oxygen sensor, a well‐established needle‐type sensor was injected inside the scaffold centre. (C) Fluorescence image of a cell‐seeded scaffold. Living cells were stained with calcein AM (green). (D) Exemplary image of a typical color‐coded 2D‐oxygen map generated by the oxygen‐imaging sensor. (E) Line‐scan deduced from the oxygen map (D, dashed line) shows the oxygen distribution across the center.
Figure 22D‐oxygen mapping by the novel oxygen‐imaging sensor. (A and B) Phase contrast micrographs of population H and L at the time point of harvest. (C and E) Oxygen maps of scaffolds seeded with 1 × 106 cells of population H and L over 24 h. (D) Colour coded oxygen scale in percentage [%]. (F‐I) Line scans from oxygen maps taken across the centre of the scaffold area (dashed line) at time point 2 h and after 24 h (n = 3).
Figure 3Graphical representation of average oxygen consumption over 24 h. (A–D) Oxygen consumption of scaffolds seeded with either 1 × 106 or 5 × 105 cells from population H and population L. Diagrams illustrate oxygen tension curves recorded by the foil‐type imaging sensor (blue line) and the needle‐type sensor (red line). A statistical difference of oxygen consumption (P < 0.01) was detected using the imaging sensor between population H and L from 5 to 15 h (A and B, 1 × 106 cells) and from 5 to 24 h (C and D, 5 × 105 cells). Regression analyses of the graphs show an almost, or precise, exponential drop in population L (1 × 106 cells R2 = 0.97; 5 × 105 cells R2 = 0.99) and in population H (1 × 106 cells R2 = 0.94; 5 × 105 cells R2 = 0.97). Values are measured by a region of interest (ROI). The area of the scaffold was outlined and the mean of the colour intensity was calculated. P‐values were calculated with Student's t‐test (n = 3 ± SD).
Figure 4Cell metabolic and proliferation activities of scaffold‐seeded hMSCs harvested from low and high confluent populations. (A) Metabolic activity of population L and H at 1 × 106 over 48 h. (B) Metabolic activity of population L and H at 5 × 105 cells. (C) Difference of the DNA content of population L and H one hour after seeding of 1 × 105 cells in a microwell plate. (D and E) Overview fluorescence images of cell seeded DBM‐scaffolds. Micrographs of the Live–Dead staining were captured at the sagittal plane after 24 h (1.25 × objective). Living cells were stained by calcein AM (green) and dead cells by ethidiumbromide‐III (red). (D) Live–Dead assay of population L at 5 × 105 cells and (E) at 1 × 106 cells (Bottom side is marked by an asterisk “*”). (n = 3 ± SD; OD = Optical Density; Scaffold wide = 9 mm).