| Literature DB >> 27748513 |
Angela Vitrano1, Giuseppina Calvaruso1, Eliana Lai2, Grazia Colletta3, Alessandra Quota4, Calogera Gerardi5, Luciana Concetta Rigoli6, Lorella Pitrolo1, Liana Cuccia7, Francesco Gagliardotto7, Aldo Filosa8, Vincenzo Caruso9, Crocetta Argento10, Saveria Campisi11, Michele Rizzo12, Luciano Prossomariti13, Carmelo Fidone14, Maria Fustaneo1, Rosario Di Maggio1, Aurelio Maggio1.
Abstract
In the last few decades, the life expectancy of regularly transfused β-thalassaemia major (TM) patients has dramatically improved following the introduction of safe transfusion practices, iron chelation therapy, aggressive treatment of infections and improved management of cardiac complications. How such changes, especially those attributed to the introduction of iron chelation therapy, improved the survival of TM patients to approach those with β-thalassaemia intermedia (TI) remains unknown. Three hundred and seventy-nine patients with TM (n = 284, dead 40) and TI (n = 95, dead 13) were followed retrospectively since birth until 30 June 2015 or death. Kaplan-Meir curves showed statistically significant differences in TM and TI survival (P < 0·0001) before the introduction of iron chelation in 1965, which were no longer apparent after that date (P = 0·086), reducing the Hazard Ratio of death in TM compared to TI from 6·8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·6-17·5] before 1965 to 2·8 (95% CI 0·8-9·2). These findings suggest that, in the era of iron chelation therapy and improved survival for TM, the major-intermedia dichotomy needs to be revisited alongside future directions in general management and prevention for both conditions.Entities:
Keywords: classification; severity; survival; thalassaemia
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27748513 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998