| Literature DB >> 27747815 |
Sarni Suhaila Rahim1,2, Vasile Palade3, James Shuttleworth3, Chrisina Jayne3.
Abstract
Digital retinal imaging is a challenging screening method for which effective, robust and cost-effective approaches are still to be developed. Regular screening for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic maculopathy diseases is necessary in order to identify the group at risk of visual impairment. This paper presents a novel automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy in eye fundus images by employing fuzzy image processing techniques. The paper first introduces the existing systems for diabetic retinopathy screening, with an emphasis on the maculopathy detection methods. The proposed medical decision support system consists of four parts, namely: image acquisition, image preprocessing including four retinal structures localisation, feature extraction and the classification of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy. A combination of fuzzy image processing techniques, the Circular Hough Transform and several feature extraction methods are implemented in the proposed system. The paper also presents a novel technique for the macula region localisation in order to detect the maculopathy. In addition to the proposed detection system, the paper highlights a novel online dataset and it presents the dataset collection, the expert diagnosis process and the advantages of our online database compared to other public eye fundus image databases for diabetic retinopathy purposes.Entities:
Keywords: Colour fundus images; Diabetic retinopathy; Eye screening; Fuzzy image processing; Maculopathy
Year: 2016 PMID: 27747815 PMCID: PMC5106407 DOI: 10.1007/s40708-016-0045-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Inform ISSN: 2198-4026
Fig. 1Diabetic maculopathy stages [55]. Mild maculopathy. Moderate maculopathy. Severe maculopathy
Fig. 2Examples of images in the dataset. Macula centre. Optic disc centre
Fig. 3Expert diagnosis file
Fig. 4Summary of experts’ diagnosis
Fig. 5Averaging the experts diagnosis
Expert diagnosis summary
| Retinopathy Stage | No. of Images |
|---|---|
| No DR | 276 |
| Mild DR without maculopathy | 72 |
| Mild DR with maculopathy | 27 |
| Moderate DR without maculopathy | 85 |
| Moderate DR with maculopathy | 83 |
| Severe DR without maculopathy | 23 |
| Severe DR with maculopathy | 11 |
| PDR without maculopathy | 6 |
| PDR with maculopathy | 10 |
| ADED | 7 |
| Total | 600 |
Fig. 6Boxplot assessment
Fig. 7Histogram assessment
ANOVA multiple comparisons
| Method of Assessment |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Expert 1 | Expert 2 | 0.001 |
| Expert 3 | 0.001 | |
| Expert 2 | Expert 1 | 0.001 |
| Expert 3 | 1.000 | |
| Expert 3 | Expert 1 | 0.001 |
| Expert 2 | 1.000 | |
Chi-square analysis
| Results | Method of assessment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expert 1 | Expert 2 | Expert 3 | ||||
| Count | % | Count | % | Count | % | |
| No DR | 326 | 54.3 | 267 | 44.5 | 314 | 52.3 |
| Mild DR without maculopathy | 55 | 9.2 | 58 | 9.7 | 14 | 2.3 |
| Mild DR with maculopathy | 21 | 3.5 | 12 | 2.0 | 31 | 5.2 |
| Moderate DR without maculopathy | 79 | 13.2 | 90 | 15.0 | 43 | 7.2 |
| Moderate DR with maculopathy | 90 | 15.0 | 127 | 21.2 | 143 | 23.8 |
| Severe DR without maculopathy | 5 | 0.8 | 6 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Severe DR with maculopathy | 3 | 0.5 | 6 | 1.0 | 19 | 3.2 |
| PDR without maculopathy | 6 | 1.0 | 9 | 1.5 | 2 | 0.3 |
| PDR with maculopathy | 8 | 1.3 | 20 | 3.3 | 25 | 4.2 |
| ADED | 7 | 1.2 | 5 | 0.8 | 9 | 1.5 |
| Total | 600 | 100 | 600 | 100 | 600 | 100 |
|
| 0.000 | |||||
Expert diagnosis summary categorisation
| Categorisation I | Categorisation II | Categorisation III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No DR | 276 | No DR | 276 | No DR | 276 |
| DR | 324 | Non-proliferative DR | 301 | Mild DR without maculopathy | 72 |
| Proliferative DR | 16 | Mild DR with maculopathy | 27 | ||
| ADED | 7 | Moderate DR without maculopathy | 85 | ||
| Moderate DR with maculopathy | 83 | ||||
| Severe DR without maculopathy | 23 | ||||
| Severe DR with maculopathy | 11 | ||||
| PDR without maculopathy | 6 | ||||
| PDR with maculopathy | 10 | ||||
| ADED | 7 | ||||
| Total | 600 | 600 | 600 | ||
Fig. 8Block diagram of the proposed automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy using fuzzy image processing
Fig. 9Preprocessing the output image. a Original image. b Greyscale conversion. c Green channel extraction. d Green channel complement. e Fuzzy filtering. f Fuzzy histogram equalisation
Fig. 10Extraction of retinal structures. a Optic disc detection. b Blood vessels segmentation. c Initial macula and fovea detection. d Proposed macula region
Fig. 11Exudates and maculopathy extraction output image. a Exudates detection. b Maculopathy detection
Fig. 12Snapshot of the proposed system user interface
Average results when using the four classifiers
| k-nearest neighbour | Polynomial Kernel SVM | RBF Kernel SVM | Naïve Bayes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misclassification error | 0.0700 | 0.3000 | 0.0700 | 0.2500 |
| Accuracy | 0.9300 | 0.7000 | 0.9300 | 0.7500 |
| Specificity | 1.0000 | 0.9787 | 0.9362 | 0.9149 |
| Sensitivity | 0.8679 | 0.4528 | 0.9245 | 0.6038 |