Literature DB >> 27747168

Daily cardiac catheterization procedural volume and complications at an academic medical center.

Kipp Slicker1, Wesley G Lane1, Ola O Oyetayo1, Laurel A Copeland2, Eileen M Stock1, Jeffrey B Michel1, John P Erwin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 1,000,000 cardiac catheterizations (CC) are performed annually in the United States. There is a small risk of complication that has persisted despite advances in technology. It is unknown whether daily CC procedural volume can influence this risk. In an effort to improve outcomes at our academic medical center, we investigated the relationship between daily CC volume and complication rates.
METHODS: We obtained data from both the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Cath-PCI and Lumedx© databases reviewing the records of patients undergoing scheduled, non-emergent CC at our facility between January 2005 to June 2013. Daily CC volume was analyzed as were complications including death, post-procedure MI, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, stroke, tamponade, bleeding, hematoma and acute kidney injury (AKI).
RESULTS: 12,773 patients were identified who underwent 16,612 CCs on 2,118 days. The average age was 63 years (SD 12.4; range, 18-95). 61% were men. A total of 326 complications occurred in 243 patients on 233 separate days (2.0% CC complication rate). The average volume per day was 7.8 CCs. We found a low correlation between daily complications and CC volume (Spearman's rho =0.11; P<0.01) though complication rates were lowest on days with 6-11 procedures; higher rates were found on slower and busier days.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a U-shaped association between CC volume and rates of CC complications. The lowest complication rates were found on days with 6-11 procedures a day. The highest complication rate was seen with >11 procedures a day.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory care; cardiac catheterization (CC); health facility size; risk factors

Year:  2016        PMID: 27747168      PMCID: PMC5059391          DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2016.05.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  19 in total

Review 1.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Steven R Bailey; John A Bittl; Bojan Cercek; Charles E Chambers; Stephen G Ellis; Robert A Guyton; Steven M Hollenberg; Umesh N Khot; Richard A Lange; Laura Mauri; Roxana Mehran; Issam D Moussa; Debabrata Mukherjee; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Thomas M Bashore; Stephen Balter; Ana Barac; John G Byrne; Jeffrey J Cavendish; Charles E Chambers; James Bernard Hermiller; Scott Kinlay; Joel S Landzberg; Warren K Laskey; Charles R McKay; Julie M Miller; David J Moliterno; John W M Moore; Sandra M Oliver-McNeil; Jeffrey J Popma; Carl L Tommaso
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The impact of epilepsy on health status among younger and older adults.

Authors:  Mary Jo V Pugh; Laurel A Copeland; John E Zeber; Joyce A Cramer; Megan E Amuan; Jose E Cavazos; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent.

Authors:  P D McGrath; D E Wennberg; J D Dickens; A E Siewers; F L Lucas; D J Malenka; M A Kellett; T J Ryan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  The NCDR CathPCI Registry: a US national perspective on care and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Issam Moussa; Anthony Hermann; John C Messenger; Gregory J Dehmer; W Douglas Weaver; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Volume-outcome relation for contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in daily clinical practice: is it limited to high-risk patients? Results from the Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).

Authors:  R Zahn; M Gottwik; M Hochadel; J Senges; U Zeymer; A Vogt; T Meinertz; R Dietz; K E Hauptmann; E Grube; S Kerber; U Sechtem
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Impact of the 80-hour workweek on patient care at a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Ali Salim; Pedro G R Teixeira; Linda Chan; Didem Oncel; Kenji Inaba; Carlos Brown; Peter Rhee; Thomas V Berne
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-08

9.  Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; John Cairns; Salim Yusuf; Kari Niemela; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Matthew Worthley; Emile Ferrari; Warren J Cantor; Anthony Fung; Nicholas Valettas; Michael Rokoss; Goran K Olivecrona; Petr Widimsky; Asim N Cheema; Peggy Gao; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  The association of hospital volumes of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with adverse outcomes, length of stay, and charges in California.

Authors:  K A Phillips; H S Luft; J L Ritchie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials and heart recovery: cardiac repair, regeneration and healing in the MCS era: a state of the "heart".

Authors:  Sveva Di Franco; Cristiano Amarelli; Andrea Montalto; Antonio Loforte; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The Effect of Hand Reflexology Massage on Pain and Fatigue in Patients after Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nahid Rejeh; Seyed Davood Tadrisi; Shahrooz Yazdani; Kiarash Saatchi; Mojtaba Vaismoradi
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  An Inexpensive Cardiovascular Flow Simulator for Cardiac Catheterization Procedure Using a Pulmonary Artery Catheter.

Authors:  Annika Johnson; Grace Cupp; Nicholas Armour; Kyle Warren; Christopher Stone; Davin Lee; Nicholas Gilbert; Chris Hammond; John Moore; Youngbok Abraham Kang
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-10-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.