Literature DB >> 27745890

Reliable prediction of postmastectomy lymphedema: The Risk Assessment Tool Evaluating Lymphedema.

Marten N Basta1, Liza C Wu2, Suhail K Kanchwala2, Joseph M Serletti2, Julia C Tchou3, Stephen J Kovach2, Joshua Fosnot2, John P Fischer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema remains a significant complication post mastectomy. Identifying patients at highest risk may better inform targeted healthcare resource allocation and improve outcomes. This study aims to identify lymphedema predictors after mastectomy to develop a simple, accurate risk assessment tool.
METHODS: An institutional retrospective review identified all women with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy between January 2000 and July 2013 with postmastectomy lymphedema as the primary outcome. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression identified independent predictors of lymphedema. A simplified risk assessment tool was derived and composite risk estimated for each patient.
RESULTS: Of 3,136 patients included, 325 (10.4%) developed lymphedema after a follow-up of 4.2 years. Significant predictors included invasive cancer diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.25), postmastectomy radiation (HR = 2.05), age over 65 years (HR = 1.90), and axillary dissection (HR = 1.79). Stratified lymphedema risk by group was defined as follows: low 6.2%, moderate 10.0%, high 16.4%, and extreme 36.4%. The model demonstrated excellent risk discrimination (C = .78).
CONCLUSIONS: Postmastectomy lymphedema incidence was 10.4%. Invasive cancer diagnosis, chemoradiation, and axillary dissection imparted significant risk. The Risk Assessment Tool Evaluating Lymphedema offers accurate risk discrimination ranging from 6.2% to 36.4%. Selective treatment approaches may improve outcomes and delivery of cost-effective healthcare.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Lymphedema; Mastectomy; Risk modeling; Risk stratification; Surgical complication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27745890     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

Review 1.  Lymphedema: From diagnosis to treatment.

Authors:  Oğuz Kayıran; Carolyn De La Cruz; Kaori Tane; Atilla Soran
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  Factors Associated With Lymphedema in Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Axillary Dissection.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Karla V Ballman; Linda McCall; Pamela L Ostby; Eris Zagar; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  The legacy of lymphedema: Impact on nursing practice and vascular access.

Authors:  Gail Larocque; Sheryl McDiarmid
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2019-07-01

4.  Features, Predictors, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Xiaochen Zhang; Jill M Oliveri; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 5.  Prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Qiu Lin; Tong Yang; Jin Yongmei; Ye Mao Die
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-13

6.  A scoring system for predicting the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Fenglian Li; Qian Lu; Sanli Jin; Quanping Zhao; Xueying Qin; Shuai Jin; Lichuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-12-14

7.  The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; April Zambelli-Weiner; Nicole Delgado; Ashley Sier; Robert Bauserman; Jerrod Nelms
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.872

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.