| Literature DB >> 27740608 |
Yunhui Li1, Minhui Zhang2, Shaojun Li3, Rongrong Lv4, Pan Chen5, Ran Liu6, Geyu Liang7, Lihong Yin8.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that epoxiconazole exposure can affect reproductive function, but few studies have investigated adverse effects on spermatogenesis. The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) was used in our study to assess effects of epoxiconazole on spermatogenesis in male nematodes after 48 h of exposure to concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 μg/L. The results demonstrated that epoxiconazole exposure affected spermatogenesis, decreasing the number of total germ cells, mitotic cells, meiotic cells and spermatids, spermatid diameter, and cross-sectional area, and inducing mitotic germ cell proliferation arrest, premature entry into meiosis, and sperm activation inhibition; however, sperm transfer showed no abnormal changes. In addition, the results showed that epoxiconazole activated the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signaling pathway and increased the expression levels of gene daf-1, daf-3, daf-4, daf-5 and daf-7 in nematodes. We therefore propose that epoxiconazole acts by activating the TGFβ signaling pathway, leading to the impairment of spermatogenesis and the consequent decline in male fertility.Entities:
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; TGF-β; epoxiconazole; spermatogenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27740608 PMCID: PMC5086732 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13100993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Gene primers tested in the study.
| Gene Name | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
|---|---|---|
| ATGTGTGACGACGAGGTT | GAAGCACTTGCGGTGAAC | |
| TTACGAGAAGAACGAGGATG | TTGGAAGTTGAATGCTGATAC | |
| GTTGCTGGACAAGAAGGC | ACCAAGAAGTGGGCGTGA | |
| GGTGATGAGTATTGGATTGTG | ATTGGCTTCTTTGGGTGT | |
| TTACAACCATCAACAGTCACC | TCCAAAACCTCACCGTCT | |
| CGAAAACCTCAACATCACA | CATCCTCCTCCAAGTCATC |
Figure 1Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on the number of outcross progeny. Bars represent means ± SEM (standard error of the mean). * p < 0.05 vs. the control group.
Figure 2Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on total germ cells and spermatids. (a) Number of total germ cells nucleus; (b) Number of spermatids nucleus. Bars represent means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group.
Figure 3Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on mitotic cells. Bars represent means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group.
Figure 4Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on meiotic cells. (a) Percentage of meiotic entry; (b) Number of meiotic cells. Bars represent means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group.
Figure 5Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on sperm size. (a) Spermatid diameter; (b) Spermatid cross-sectional area. Bars represent means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group.
Figure 6Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on sperm activation. Bars represent means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group.
Figure 7Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on sperm migration.
Figure 8Effects of epoxiconazole exposure on the expression levels of TGF-β signaling pathway genes. Bars represent means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. the control group.