Kevin R Lewis1, Susan McCrone2, Pamela Deiriggi3, Sachin Bendre4. 1. Clinical Associate Professor, West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Charleston, West Virginia. 2. Professor, West Virginia University, School of Nursing, Morgantown, West Virginia. 3. Associate Professor, West Virginia University, School of Nursing, Morgantown, West Virginia. 4. Assistant Professor, West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Charleston, West Virginia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control in children, adolescents, and young adults ages 7-21 years with poorly controlled diabetes HbA1c 9.0% or more (74 mmol/mol IFCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary outcome was improvement in HbA1c. The secondary outcome included self-reported hypoglycemia. This 12-week study used a prospective, one-group, pre- and posttest pre-experimental design with a convenience sample. The study used the Medtronic Guardian CGM with Enlite Sensor. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-three subjects enrolled in the study. The mean age of the participants was 15.57 years, range was 11-20 years, 47.6% were male, and 52.4% were female. Twenty-one (63.6%) completed the final study visit. There was a clinically and statistically significant reduction of 1.46 (SD = 1.6711) (p = .001) in HbA1c at 12 weeks. Fifteen of the 21 participants (71.4%) had an HbA1c reduction of greater than 0.5%. The CGM monitor was worn a mean of 4.262 days a week. None of the subjects reported significant hypoglycemia while wearing the monitor. CGM was effective in improving glycemic control in this population with poorly controlled diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycemic control in children, adolescents, and young adults ages 7-21 years with poorly controlled diabetes HbA1c 9.0% or more (74 mmol/mol IFCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary outcome was improvement in HbA1c. The secondary outcome included self-reported hypoglycemia. This 12-week study used a prospective, one-group, pre- and posttest pre-experimental design with a convenience sample. The study used the Medtronic Guardian CGM with Enlite Sensor. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-three subjects enrolled in the study. The mean age of the participants was 15.57 years, range was 11-20 years, 47.6% were male, and 52.4% were female. Twenty-one (63.6%) completed the final study visit. There was a clinically and statistically significant reduction of 1.46 (SD = 1.6711) (p = .001) in HbA1c at 12 weeks. Fifteen of the 21 participants (71.4%) had an HbA1c reduction of greater than 0.5%. The CGM monitor was worn a mean of 4.262 days a week. None of the subjects reported significant hypoglycemia while wearing the monitor. CGM was effective in improving glycemic control in this population with poorly controlled diabetes.
Authors: Janet Silverstein; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Kenneth Copeland; Leslie Plotnick; Francine Kaufman; Lori Laffel; Larry Deeb; Margaret Grey; Barbara Anderson; Lea Ann Holzmeister; Nathaniel Clark Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Thomas C Blevins; Bruce W Bode; Satish K Garg; George Grunberger; Irl B Hirsch; Lois Jovanovič; Elizabeth Nardacci; Eric A Orzeck; Victor L Roberts; William V Tamborlane; Caitlin Rothermel Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Richard M Bergenstal; William V Tamborlane; Andrew Ahmann; John B Buse; George Dailey; Stephen N Davis; Carol Joyce; Tim Peoples; Bruce A Perkins; John B Welsh; Steven M Willi; Michael A Wood Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roy W Beck; Bruce Buckingham; Kellee Miller; Howard Wolpert; Dongyuan Xing; Jennifer M Block; H Peter Chase; Irl Hirsch; Craig Kollman; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Kerry Milaszewski; Katrina J Ruedy; William V Tamborlane Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nancy Elbarbary; Othmar Moser; Saif Al Yaarubi; Hussain Alsaffar; Adnan Al Shaikh; Ramzi A Ajjan; Asma Deeb Journal: Diab Vasc Dis Res Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.291