Ari J Elliot1, Nicholas A Turiano2, Benjamin P Chapman3,4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, 300 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA. ari_elliot@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, 300 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic health disparities research may benefit from further consideration of dispositional factors potentially modifying risk associated with low socioeconomic status, including that indexed by systemic inflammation. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate interactions of SES and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) personality traits in predicting circulating concentrations of the inflammatory markers interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHOD: Using a sample of middle-aged and older adults from the Midlife in the United States Survey (MIDUS) biomarker project (N = 978), linear regression models tested interactions of each FFM trait with a composite measure of SES in predicting IL-6 and CRP, as well as the explanatory role of medical morbidity, measures of adiposity, and health behaviors. RESULTS: SES interacted with conscientiousness to predict levels of IL-6 (interaction b = .03, p = .002) and CRP (interaction b = .04, p = .014) and with neuroticism to predict IL-6 (interaction b = -.03, p = .004). Socioeconomic gradients in both markers were smaller at higher levels of conscientiousness. Conversely, the socioeconomic gradient in IL-6 was larger at higher levels of neuroticism. Viewed from the perspective of SES as the moderator, neuroticism was positively related to IL-6 at low levels of SES but negatively related at high SES. Interactions of SES with both conscientiousness and neuroticism were attenuated upon adjustment for measures of adiposity. CONCLUSIONS: Conscientiousness may buffer, and neuroticism amplify, excess inflammatory risk associated with low SES, in part through relationships with adiposity. Neuroticism may be associated with lower levels of inflammation at high levels of SES.
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic health disparities research may benefit from further consideration of dispositional factors potentially modifying risk associated with low socioeconomic status, including that indexed by systemic inflammation. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate interactions of SES and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) personality traits in predicting circulating concentrations of the inflammatory markers interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHOD: Using a sample of middle-aged and older adults from the Midlife in the United States Survey (MIDUS) biomarker project (N = 978), linear regression models tested interactions of each FFM trait with a composite measure of SES in predicting IL-6 and CRP, as well as the explanatory role of medical morbidity, measures of adiposity, and health behaviors. RESULTS:SES interacted with conscientiousness to predict levels of IL-6 (interaction b = .03, p = .002) and CRP (interaction b = .04, p = .014) and with neuroticism to predict IL-6 (interaction b = -.03, p = .004). Socioeconomic gradients in both markers were smaller at higher levels of conscientiousness. Conversely, the socioeconomic gradient in IL-6 was larger at higher levels of neuroticism. Viewed from the perspective of SES as the moderator, neuroticism was positively related to IL-6 at low levels of SES but negatively related at high SES. Interactions of SES with both conscientiousness and neuroticism were attenuated upon adjustment for measures of adiposity. CONCLUSIONS: Conscientiousness may buffer, and neuroticism amplify, excess inflammatory risk associated with low SES, in part through relationships with adiposity. Neuroticism may be associated with lower levels of inflammation at high levels of SES.
Entities:
Keywords:
C-reactive protein; Conscientiousness; Inflammation; Interleukin-6; Neuroticism; Personality; Socioeconomic status
Authors: Roland J Thorpe; Annemarie Koster; Hans Bosma; Tamara B Harris; Eleanor M Simonsick; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Anne B Newman; Suzanne Satterfield; Susan M Rubin; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2012-02
Authors: Benjamin P Chapman; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Christopher L Seplaki; Nancy Talbot; Paul Duberstein; Jan Moynihan Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Benjamin P Chapman; Ayesha Khan; Mary Harper; Doug Stockman; Kevin Fiscella; James Walton; Paul Duberstein; Nancy Talbot; Jeffrey M Lyness; Jan Moynihan Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2008-12-31 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Keith Millar; Suzanne M Lloyd; Jennifer S McLean; G David Batty; Harry Burns; Jonathan Cavanagh; Kevin A Deans; Ian Ford; Alex McConnachie; Agnes McGinty; Réne Mõttus; Chris J Packard; Naveed Sattar; Paul G Shiels; Yoga N Velupillai; Carol Tannahill Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Páraic S O'Súilleabháin; Nicholas A Turiano; Denis Gerstorf; Martina Luchetti; Stephen Gallagher; Amanda A Sesker; Antonio Terracciano; Angelina R Sutin Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 7.217