Literature DB >> 27738960

Failure to achieve first attempt success at intubation using video laryngoscopy is associated with increased complications.

Cameron Hypes1,2, John Sakles2, Raj Joshi1,2, Jeremy Greenberg1,2, Bhupinder Natt1, Josh Malo1, John Bloom1, Harsharon Chopra3, Jarrod Mosier4,5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to investigate the association between first attempt success and intubation-related complications in the Intensive Care Unit after the widespread adoption of video laryngoscopy. We further sought to characterize and identify the predictors of complications that occur despite first attempt success. This was a prospective observational study of consecutive intubations performed with video laryngoscopy at an academic medical Intensive Care Unit. Operator, procedural, and complication data were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between the intubation attempts and the occurrence of one or more complications. A total of 905 patients were intubated using a video laryngoscope. First attempt success occurred in 739 (81.7 %), whereas >1 attempt was needed in 166 (18.3 %). One or more complications occurred in 146 (19.8 %) of those intubated on the first attempt versus 107 (64.5 %, p < 0.001) of those requiring more than one attempt. Logistic regression analysis shows that >1 attempt is associated with 6.4 (95 % CI 4.4-9.3) times the adjusted odds of at least one complication. Pre-intubation predictors of at least one complication despite first attempt success include vomit or edema in the airway as well as the presence of hypoxemia or hypotension. There are increased odds of complications with even a second attempt at intubation in the Intensive Care Unit. Complications occur frequently despite a successful first attempt, and as such, the goal of airway management should not be simply first attempt success, but instead first attempt success without complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway management; Artificial; Intensive care units; Intratracheal; Intubation; Laryngoscopy; Respiration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27738960     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1549-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  21 in total

1.  Limitations of difficult airway prediction in patients intubated in the emergency department.

Authors:  Richard M Levitan; Worth W Everett; E Andrew Ochroch
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill.

Authors:  Donald E G Griesdale; T Laine Bosma; Tobias Kurth; George Isac; Dean R Chittock
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before-after comparative study.

Authors:  Audrey De Jong; Noémie Clavieras; Matthieu Conseil; Yannael Coisel; Pierre-Henri Moury; Yvan Pouzeratte; Moussa Cisse; Fouad Belafia; Boris Jung; Gérald Chanques; Nicolas Molinari; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study.

Authors:  Samir Jaber; Jibba Amraoui; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Charles Arich; Robert Cohendy; Liliane Landreau; Yves Calvet; Xavier Capdevila; Aba Mahamat; Jean-Jacques Eledjam
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  The impact of a comprehensive airway management training program for pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows. A three-year experience.

Authors:  Jarrod M Mosier; Joshua Malo; John C Sakles; Cameron D Hypes; Bhupinder Natt; Linda Snyder; James Knepler; John W Bloom; Raj Joshi; Kenneth Knox
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-04

6.  Feasibility of the preoperative Mallampati airway assessment in emergency department patients.

Authors:  Aaron E Bair; Rebekah Caravelli; Katren Tyler; Erik G Laurin
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts.

Authors:  Thomas C Mort
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Incidence of and risk factors for severe cardiovascular collapse after endotracheal intubation in the ICU: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Sebastien Perbet; Audrey De Jong; Julie Delmas; Emmanuel Futier; Bruno Pereira; Samir Jaber; Jean-Michel Constantin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  The Physiologically Difficult Airway.

Authors:  Jarrod M Mosier; Raj Joshi; Cameron Hypes; Garrett Pacheco; Terence Valenzuela; John C Sakles
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-08

10.  Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults.

Authors:  C Frerk; V S Mitchell; A F McNarry; C Mendonca; R Bhagrath; A Patel; E P O'Sullivan; N M Woodall; I Ahmad
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The intensive care medicine research agenda for airways, invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Samir Jaber; Giacomo Bellani; Lluis Blanch; Alexandre Demoule; Andrés Esteban; Luciano Gattinoni; Claude Guérin; Nicholas Hill; John G Laffey; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Jordi Mancebo; Paul H Mayo; Jarrod M Mosier; Paolo Navalesi; Michael Quintel; Jean Louis Vincent; John J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The use of video laryngoscopy outside the operating room: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emma J Perkins; Jonathan L Begley; Fiona M Brewster; Nathan D Hanegbi; Arun A Ilancheran; David J Brewster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Optimizing Rapid Sequence Intubation for Medical and Trauma Patients in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Berkeley L Bennett; Daniel Scherzer; Delia Gold; Don Buckingham; Andrew McClain; Elaise Hill; Adjoa Andoh; Joseph Christman; Andrew Shonk; Sandra P Spencer
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 4.  Video screen visualization patterns when using a video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Preston Dean; Benjamin Kerrey
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-06

5.  Describing the Challenges of Prehospital Rapid Sequence Intubation by Macintosh Blade Video Laryngoscopy Recordings.

Authors:  Clare Hayes-Bradley; Hugo Gemal; Matthew Miller; Sandra Ware
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.866

6.  Impact of Macintosh blade size on endotracheal intubation success in intensive care units: a retrospective multicenter observational MacSize-ICU study.

Authors:  Thomas Godet; Audrey De Jong; Côme Garin; Renaud Guérin; Benjamin Rieu; Lucile Borao; Bruno Pereira; Nicolas Molinari; Jean-Etienne Bazin; Matthieu Jabaudon; Gérald Chanques; Emmanuel Futier; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 41.787

7.  Direct vs Video Laryngoscopy for Difficult Airway Patients in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry Study.

Authors:  Brandon T Ruderman; Martina Mali; Amy H Kaji; Robert Kilgo; Susan Watts; Radosveta Wells; Alexander T Limkakeng; Joseph B Borawski; Andrea E Fantegrossi; Ron M Walls; Calvin A Brown
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-08-19

8.  Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes during Different Airway Scenarios Performed by Experienced Paramedics: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study.

Authors:  Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak; Jacek Smereka; Marek Dabrowski; Szymon Bialka; Lauretta Mosteller; Agnieszka Szarpak; Kobi Ludwin; Marzena Wojewodzka-Zelezniakowicz; Jerzy Robert Ladny
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.