Literature DB >> 27737995

Family physician access to and wait times for cancer diagnostic investigations: Regional differences among 3 provinces.

Andriana Barisic1, Maxine Kish2, Julie Gilbert3, Nicole Mittmann4, Rahim Moineddin5, Jeffrey Sisler6, Peter Vedsted7, Eva Grunfeld8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine provincial and regional differences in FPs' direct access to cancer diagnostic investigations and advice from other specialists regarding investigations and referrals, and to explore FPs' perceptions about wait times for diagnostic investigations and receipt of results.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional, online survey.
SETTING: British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of FPs from participating provinces. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct FP access to various diagnostic investigations and advice from other specialists regarding investigations and referrals; FPs' perceptions about wait times for diagnostic investigations ordered directly; and FPs' perceptions about wait times for results.
RESULTS: A total of 1054 surveys were completed by FPs from British Columbia (n = 229), Manitoba (n = 228), and Ontario (n = 597). Distance from a cancer centre was not significantly associated with direct access to or wait times for diagnostic investigations for most of the investigations studied; however, provincial differences were observed. Family physicians in Manitoba and British Columbia were 30% to 45% less likely to report having direct access to endoscopy and some imaging investigations compared with FPs in Ontario. Family physicians in Manitoba and British Columbia were also at increased odds of waiting longer than 12 weeks for endoscopy investigations and longer than 4 weeks for imaging investigations compared with FPs in Ontario. Most FPs reported wait times of less than 2 weeks for imaging results; however, the proportion of FPs who waited longer than 2 weeks for colonoscopy results ranged from 15% in Ontario to 96% in British Columbia.
CONCLUSION: Given the disparities observed among provinces, there is an opportunity for provinces to learn from one another to improve direct access to and shorten wait times for diagnostic investigations. This in turn has the potential to shorten the primary care interval for cancer diagnostic assessment. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27737995      PMCID: PMC5063786     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  14 in total

Review 1.  Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  M A Richards; A M Westcombe; S B Love; P Littlejohns; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Prostate cancer incidence and mortality in rural men--a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Z Obertova; C Brown; M Holmes; R Lawrenson
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: an international collaboration to inform cancer policy in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  John Butler; Catherine Foot; Martine Bomb; Sara Hiom; Michel Coleman; Heather Bryant; Peter Vedsted; Jane Hanson; Mike Richards
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography.

Authors:  J Leung; S McKenzie; J Martin; D McLaughlin
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Geographical variation and factors associated with colorectal cancer mortality in a universal health care system.

Authors:  Mahmoud Torabi; Christopher Green; Zoann Nugent; Salaheddin Mahmud; Alain Demers; Jane Griffith; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-04

6.  Rural-urban disparities in incidence and outcomes of neuroendocrine tumors: A population-based analysis of 6271 cases.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Calvin H L Law; Paul J Karanicolas; Refik Saskin; Ning Liu; Simron Singh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  R D Neal; P Tharmanathan; B France; N U Din; S Cotton; J Fallon-Ferguson; W Hamilton; A Hendry; M Hendry; R Lewis; U Macleod; E D Mitchell; M Pickett; T Rai; K Shaw; N Stuart; M L Tørring; C Wilkinson; B Williams; N Williams; J Emery
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey.

Authors:  Peter W Rose; Greg Rubin; Rafael Perera-Salazar; Sigrun Saur Almberg; Andriana Barisic; Martin Dawes; Eva Grunfeld; Nigel Hart; Richard D Neal; Marie Pirotta; Jeffrey Sisler; Gerald Konrad; Berit Skjødeberg Toftegaard; Hans Thulesius; Peter Vedsted; Jane Young; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Do diagnostic delays in cancer matter?

Authors:  R D Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The effect of direct access to CT scan in early lung cancer detection: an unblinded, cluster-randomised trial.

Authors:  Louise Mahncke Guldbrandt; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Torben Riis Rasmussen; Finn Rasmussen; Peter Meldgaard; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  Primary Care Continuity and Wait Times to Receiving Breast Cancer Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Using CanIMPACT Data.

Authors:  Rachel Lin Walsh; Aisha Lofters; Rahim Moineddin; Monika Krzyzanowska; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.