Literature DB >> 23693117

The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: an international collaboration to inform cancer policy in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

John Butler1, Catherine Foot, Martine Bomb, Sara Hiom, Michel Coleman, Heather Bryant, Peter Vedsted, Jane Hanson, Mike Richards.   

Abstract

The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) was initiated by the Department of Health in England to study international variation in cancer survival, and to inform policy to improve cancer survival. It is a research collaboration between twelve jurisdictions in six countries: Australia (New South Wales, Victoria), Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario), Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, Wales). Leadership is provided by policymakers, with academics, clinicians and cancer registries forming an international network to conduct the research. The project currently has five modules examining: (1) cancer survival, (2) population awareness and beliefs about cancer, (3) attitudes, behaviours and systems in primary care, (4) delays in diagnosis and treatment, and their causes, and (5) treatment, co-morbidities and other factors. These modules employ a range of methodologies including epidemiological and statistical analyses, surveys and clinical record audit. The first publications have already been used to inform and develop cancer policies in participating countries, and a further series of publications is under way. The module design, governance structure, funding arrangements and management approach to the partnership provide a case study in conducting international comparisons of health systems that are both academically and clinically robust and of immediate relevance to policymakers.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benchmarking; Cancer policy; Cancer survival; International comparisons

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23693117     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  44 in total

1.  Factors associated with waiting time to breast cancer diagnosis among symptomatic breast cancer patients: a population-based study from Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Colleen Webber; Marlo Whitehead; Andrea Eisen; Claire M B Holloway; Patti A Groome
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Family physician access to and wait times for cancer diagnostic investigations: Regional differences among 3 provinces.

Authors:  Andriana Barisic; Maxine Kish; Julie Gilbert; Nicole Mittmann; Rahim Moineddin; Jeffrey Sisler; Peter Vedsted; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Recent advances in defining and benchmarking complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Lucas Goense; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillergersberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment wait times in specialized diagnostic units compared with usual care: a population-based study.

Authors:  C Webber; M Whitehead; A Eisen; C M B Holloway; P A Groome
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Responsibility for follow-up during the diagnostic process in primary care: a secondary analysis of International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership data.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Clare R Goyder; Clare R Bankhead; Berit S Toftegaard; Peter W Rose; Hans Thulesius; Peter Vedsted; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Variation in suspected cancer referral pathways in primary care: comparative analysis across the International Benchmarking Cancer Partnership.

Authors:  Charlotte Lynch; Samantha Harrison; Jon D Emery; Cathy Clelland; Laurence Dorman; Claire Collins; May-Lill Johansen; Ross Lawrenson; Alun Surgey; David Weller; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl; Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.302

7.  Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study.

Authors:  Melina Arnold; Mark J Rutherford; Aude Bardot; Jacques Ferlay; Therese M-L Andersson; Tor Åge Myklebust; Hanna Tervonen; Vicky Thursfield; David Ransom; Lorraine Shack; Ryan R Woods; Donna Turner; Suzanne Leonfellner; Susan Ryan; Nathalie Saint-Jacques; Prithwish De; Carol McClure; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Heather Stuart-Panko; Gerda Engholm; Paul M Walsh; Christopher Jackson; Sally Vernon; Eileen Morgan; Anna Gavin; David S Morrison; Dyfed W Huws; Geoff Porter; John Butler; Heather Bryant; David C Currow; Sara Hiom; D Max Parkin; Peter Sasieni; Paul C Lambert; Bjørn Møller; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Population-based cancer survival (2001 to 2009) in the United States: Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  Hannah K Weir; Sherri L Stewart; Claudia Allemani; Mary C White; Cheryll C Thomas; Arica White; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Awareness of risk factors for cancer: a comparative study of Sweden and Denmark.

Authors:  Magdalena Lagerlund; Line Hvidberg; Senada Hajdarevic; Anette Fischer Pedersen; Sara Runesdotter; Peter Vedsted; Carol Tishelman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Survival analyses of postoperative lung cancer patients: an investigation using Japanese administrative data.

Authors:  Susumu Kunisawa; Kazuto Yamashita; Hiroshi Ikai; Tetsuya Otsubo; Yuichi Imanaka
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.