Paulo Gabriel Melo Brandão1, Francisco Ricardo Lobo2, Serginando Laudenir Ramin2, Yasser Sakr3, Mauricio Nassau Machado4, Suzana Margareth Lobo1. 1. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. 2. Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany. 4. Division of Cardiology. Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
Objective: α-2-agonists cause sympathetic inhibition combined with parasympathetic activation and have other properties that could be beneficial during cardiac anesthesia. We evaluated the effects of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjuvant compared to a control group during cardiac surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all adult patients (> 18 years old) undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, regarding the use of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant intraoperatively (DEX group) and a control group who did not receive α-2-agonist (CON group). Results: A total of 1302 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, either coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery, were included; 796 in the DEX group and 506 in the CON group. Need for reoperation (2% vs. 2.8%, P=0.001), type 1 neurological injury (2% vs. 4.7%, P=0.005) and prolonged hospitalization (3.1% vs. 7.3%, P=0.001) were significantly less frequent in the DEX group than in the CON group. Thirty-day mortality rates were 3.4% in the DEX group and 9.7% in the CON group (P<0.001). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis with in hospital death as the dependent variable, dexmedetomidine was independently associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]=0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.65, P≤0.001). The Logistic EuroSCORE (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, P=0.004) and age (OR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, P=0.003) were independently associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine used as an anesthetic adjuvant was associated with better outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery. Randomized prospective controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.
Objective: α-2-agonists cause sympathetic inhibition combined with parasympathetic activation and have other properties that could be beneficial during cardiac anesthesia. We evaluated the effects of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjuvant compared to a control group during cardiac surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all adult patients (> 18 years old) undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, regarding the use of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant intraoperatively (DEX group) and a control group who did not receive α-2-agonist (CON group). Results: A total of 1302 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, either coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery, were included; 796 in the DEX group and 506 in the CON group. Need for reoperation (2% vs. 2.8%, P=0.001), type 1 neurological injury (2% vs. 4.7%, P=0.005) and prolonged hospitalization (3.1% vs. 7.3%, P=0.001) were significantly less frequent in the DEX group than in the CON group. Thirty-day mortality rates were 3.4% in the DEX group and 9.7% in the CON group (P<0.001). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis with in hospital death as the dependent variable, dexmedetomidine was independently associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]=0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.65, P≤0.001). The Logistic EuroSCORE (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, P=0.004) and age (OR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, P=0.003) were independently associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality. Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine used as an anesthetic adjuvant was associated with better outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery. Randomized prospective controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.
Cardiac anesthesia has changed over the years from using high doses of opioids to
fast-track surgery. High doses of opioids were justified based on the hemodynamic
stability provided even in patients with marginal cardiac reserve[, but resulted in patients requiring
prolonged mechanical ventilation support. Limited financial resources and a shortage
of intensive care unit (ICU) beds have increased the need to optimize treatment and
avoid complications in the postoperative period. Fasttrack cardiac anesthesia uses
methods, such as short acting neuromuscular blockers, low-doses of opioids or
regional anesthesia, with the intention of speeding up weaning from ventilation and
decreasing ICU length of stay[.
Fast-track cardiac anesthesia is being adopted more and more widely to reduce ICU
bed use and hospital costs associated with postoperative care[. The safety and ability of this approach to diminish time on
the ventilator have been demonstrated recently in a large cohort of almost 8000
patients[. Use of
anesthetic adjuvants with opioids sparing qualities may create alternatives that
accelerate weaning from mechanical ventilation and patients recovery.Many beneficial effects of α-2-agonists have been reported,
including a decrease in sympathetic tone with attenuation of hemodynamic and
neuroendocrine responses to stress[ and reduced anesthetic and opioid requirements[. Dexmedetomidine has analgesic,
sedative, anxiolytic and sympatholytic properties. Patients in the ICU sedated with
dexmedetomidine alone wake when requested, become cooperative and the drug does not
cause respiratory depression[.
Herr et al.[ demonstrated the
safety and benefits of using dexmedetomidine in comparison to propofol sedation in
the postoperative period of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. In a
double-blind randomized study, Jalonen et al.[ compared dexmedetomidine to fentanyl as an anesthesia
adjunct during CABG. They reported reduced sympathetic tone, attenuated hyperdynamic
responses with dexmedetomidine and a reduction on additional fentanyl doses during
the operation before bypass and postoperatively[.The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine as an
anesthetic adjuvant during CABG and valve surgery on mortality and on the length of
stay in the ICU compared to a control group receiving general balanced
anesthesia.
METHODS
This study was a retrospective analysis of an electronic database with data
prospectively collected from January 2003 to April 2011. The data were retrieved
from the databank collected for a previously published study registered in Clinical
Trials.gov (NCT00780845) by one of the authors (MNM)[. Because of the retrospective nature of the
study, the need for written informed consent was waived by the local ethics
committee.Either propofol (2 mg/kg) or etomidate (0.2 mg/kg) were used for anesthesia
induction. Isoflurane was used in minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) range of
0.8-1.2 for anesthetic maintenance in both groups, depending on the anesthetic depth
required. Neuromuscular block was achieved with an infusion of atracurium at 8
µg/kg/min. The anesthetic adjuvant was used at the discretion of the
anesthesiologist, according to his/her experience. Patients were divided into two
groups according to whether they had received dexmedetomidine (DEX group), given as
a loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg over 20 minutes for anesthesia induction and a
maintenance infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/h, or a control group (CON group) technique
without anesthetic adjuvant. Both groups could receive doses of fentanyl as
necessary (bolus of 1-5 µg/kg).The preoperative estimation for risk of hospital death was calculated using the
Logistic EuroSCORE[. Left
ventricular ejection fraction was estimated for each patient using M-mode
echocardiography based on the cubed or Teicholz method, wall motion scoring, or
biplane Simpson's methods, or ventricular angiography. Data were collected on time
on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), need for dialysis or intra-aortic balloon pump
(IABP), mortality at 30 days and need for reintubation because of pulmonary
complications. Acute kidney injury was assessed based on the AKIN
classification[. Type 1
neurological injury was defined as a new episode of motor deficit, coma, seizure or
encephalic lesion documented by cranial computed tomography or magnetic resonance
imaging. Hospital mortality and hospital discharge dates were available for all
patients from electronic hospital records.Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistical version 17 and StatsDirect Software version
2.7.8. Descriptive statistics were computed for all study variables. The
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution of
continuous variables. Non-parametric tests of comparison were used for variables
evaluated as not being normally distributed. Difference testing between groups was
performed using Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests as
appropriate.A survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier graphs at 30 days and the log
rank test was used to compare the survival curves. We performed a multivariable
logistic regression analysis with 30-day mortality as the dependent variable to
evaluate the possible influence of dexmedetomidine on 30-day mortality after
adjusting for possible confounders. In this analysis, we included age, gender, the
logistic EuroSCORE, body mass index, dexmedetomidine, CABG or valve surgery,
diabetes mellitus, moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction, number of
grafts, on-pump CABG, duration of CPB and use of IABP. Colinearity was excluded
prior to modeling (R2>0.6 for all pairwise correlations). None of the
included variables was colinear. A Hosmer and Lemeshow test was performed to assess
the goodness of fit for the final model. In the case of categorical variables, a
reference category was defined. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were
computed. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation
(SD) or median [25-75% interquartile range] (IQ) and categorical variables as number
and percentage unless otherwise indicated. All statistics were two-tailed, and a
P<0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
We included 1302 consecutive patients who underwent CABG (n=817) or valve (n=485)
surgery during the study period (63% male; age =54.7±13.2 years): 796
patients in the DEX group and 506 patients in the CON group. The characteristics of
the study groups are shown in Table 1. The
overall 30-day hospital mortality was 5.8%.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics.
CON group (n=506)
DEX group (n=796)
P-value
Male (%)
312 (62)
506 (64)
0.487
Age, years; median [IQ]
58 [47-67]
56 [47-64]
0.013
EuroSCORE (Additive)
3 (2-5)
3 (1-4)
<0.001
EuroSCORE (Logistic)
4.0±5.4
2.8±2.9
<0.001
Diabetes mellitus
110 (22)
174 (22)
0.959
Moderate/severe LVD
118 (23)
153 (19)
0.076
CABG n (%)
310 (61)
507 (64)
0.377
On-pump surgery n (%)
421 (83)
616 (77)
0.011
Number of grafts
3 (2-3)
2 (2-3)
0.352
Duration of CPB
94 [79–112]
88 [74-105]
<0.001
Valve surgery
196 (39)
289 (36)
0.377
Baseline characteristics.Patients in the DEX group were younger (54.7±13.2 years vs.
56.5±13.1 years, P=0.013) and had a lower additive EuroSCORE
(3; 1-4 vs. 3; 2-5, P<0.001) than patients in
the CON group. More patients in the CON group (83%) underwent on-pump surgery than
in the DEX group (77%) (P=0.011). Time on CPB was longer in the CON
group (94 minutes) than in the DEX group (88 minutes) (P<0.001)
(Table 1).ICU length of stay was significantly shorter for patients in the DEX group
(3.7±4.4 days) than for patients in the CON group (4.4±6.3 days)
(P=0.02). Thirty-day hospital mortality rates were 3.4% in the
DEX group and 9.7% in the CON group (P<0.001) (Table 2).
Table 2
Outcome parameters in the study groups.
CON group (n=506)
DEX group (n=796)
P-value
Reintubation
58 (11.0)
67 (8.4)
0.069
Need for reoperation
10 (2.0)
22 (2.8)
0.371
Atrial fibrillation
47 (9.3)
52 (6.5)
0.067
Acute kidney injury
135 (27.0)
190 (24.0)
0.253
Type 1 neurological injury
24 (4.7)
16 (2.0)
0.005
ICU readmission
28 (5.5)
28 (3.5)
0.081
ICU LOS (days); mean ± SD
4.4±6.3
3.7±4.4
0.020
30-day hospital mortality rates
49 (9.7)
27 (3.4)
<0.001
ICU=intensive care unit; LOS=length of stay; SD=standard
deviation
Outcome parameters in the study groups.ICU=intensive care unit; LOS=length of stay; SD=standard
deviationThe Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the DEX and CON groups are shown in Figure 1 (log-rank and Wilcoxon =
P<0.001). Results from the multivariable logistic regression
analysis with death as the dependent variable are shown in Table 3. Use of dexmedetomidine was independently associated
with a lower risk of 30-day mortality OR=0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI):
0.24-0.65, P≤0.001). The Logistic EuroSCORE (OR=1.05, 95%
CI: 1.02-1.10, P=0.004) and age (OR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06,
P=0.003) were independently associated with a higher risk of
30-day mortality.
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
Table 3
Multivariable logistic regression analysis with 30-day hospital mortality
as the dependent variable.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis with 30-day hospital mortality
as the dependent variable.CABG=coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CI=confidence intervalHosmer and Lemeshow Chi square = 10.3 (P=0.244)Nagelkerke R-square = 0.109Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
DISCUSSION
The main finding of this study in a large cohort of cardiac surgery patients is that
use of dexmedetomidine, an α-2-agonist, as an anesthetic adjuvant
was independently associated with a lower risk of 30-day in-hospital death compared
to the CON group. In addition, patients receiving dexmedetomidine spent less time in
the ICU and had a lower frequency of type 1 neurological lesions.The reasons for the better outcomes are not known, but is likely to be related to the
blunting of stress response, greater hemodynamic stability, sparing effect on oxygen
consumption, protection of perioperative ischemia and preservation of neutrophil/
cellular immune function reported with the use of dexmedetomidine in comparison to
opioids[.Accordingly, Wijeysundera et al.[ performed a systematic review of studies evaluating the use of
α-2-agonists (clonidine, dexmedetomidine or mivazerol)
perioperatively for the prevention of cardiac complications among patients
undergoing surgery. Overall, α-2-adrenergic agonists were
associated with a more than 50% reduction in mortality in vascular surgery patients,
in addition to reductions in cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction. Even when
initiated after CBP infusion of dexmedetomidine was associated with decreased
postoperative mortality up to 1 year and decreased incidence of postoperative
complications and delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery[. In children undergoing complex
congenital heart disease the use of dexmedetomidine after anesthesia induction was
associated with less variability in heart rate and blood pressure than with the use
of propofol[.We found a decreased incidence of neurological problems in the DEX group in
univariate analysis. The possibility of neuroprotection is speculative and should be
tested prospectively. It has been suggested that α-2-adrenergic
agonists improve neurological deficit scores and reduce infarct sizes in cerebral
ischemia. These agonists improved the histomorphological and neurological outcomes
after cerebral ischemic injury when administered during ischemia, and recent studies
have provided considerable evidence that α-2-adrenergic agonists
can protect the brain from ischemia/ reperfusion injury[. The mechanisms by which
α-2-adrenergic agonists exert their neuroprotective effects are
still unclear in humans since almost all studies regarding the neuroprotective
effects of dexmedetomidine have been performed in animals[ or in vitro[. Sulemanji et al.[ demonstrated no benefit of
dexmedetomidine as a neuroprotective agent during CABG surgery. Nevertheless, the
use of dexmedetomidine as sedative agent in critically illpatients is associated
with reduction in the incidence of delirium[. It is possible that the hemodynamic stability provided by
dexmedetomidine may have favorable effects on the maintenance of cerebral
perfusion[.Older age and the CPB time were associated with a higher risk of death in our study.
The increased morbidity and mortality seen in elderly patients after cardiac
surgical procedures is due to biological aging processes, but also to greater
disease severity, associated comorbidities and surgical urgency than in younger
patients[. Widyastuti et al.[ identified older age as predictor
of prolonged mechanical ventilation following cardiac surgery. Older patients also
have twice the incidence of postoperative stroke[. Both, older age and CPB time are linked to
neurological dysfunction because of the augmented risk for microvascular cerebral
obstruction and decline neurocognitive function[.The present study has some important limitations; particularly its retrospective
nature with potential bias. The heterogeneity in the baseline status of the groups
regarding age, EuroSCORE and CPB time, are all likely to be related to worse
outcomes. The CON group had a higher mortality than it is expected on the
literature. The EuroSCORE prognostic index did not reflect the mortality rate seen
in this group, but it is not known if it is an applicable tool to our system of
care. The agreement between the predict mortality by the EuroSCORE has been
questioned by different centers in Brazil with conflicting results[, therefore a weight adjustment factor could probably
correct its performance. In addition, the hospital where the study was performed is
a reference in public health care system, being responsible to treat the most severe
cases of a population that does not have access to primary health care. Indeed, the
long observation period also carries a risk of other variables to be involved on the
results. We corrected for a large number of possible confounders by performing a
multivariate analysis, but it is possible that other, unknown, confounders were
still present. Complications were analyzed at a univariate level; therefore a
cause-effect relationship cannot be definitely established.
CONCLUSION
Dexmedetomidine used as an anesthetic adjuvant was associated with better outcomes in
patients undergoing CABG and valve surgery. Randomized prospective controlled trials
are warranted to confirm our results.
Abbreviations, acronyms &
symbols
CABG
= Coronary artery bypass graft
CI
= Confidence interval
CON
= Control
CPB
= Cardiopulmonary bypass
DEX
= Dexmedetomidine
IABP
= Intra-aortic balloon pump
ICU
= Intensive care unit
IQ
= Interquartile range
MAC
= Minimal alveolar concentration
OR
= Odds ratio
SD
= Standard deviation
Authors' roles &
responsibilities
PGMB
Realization of operations and/or trials; final manuscript
approval
FRL
Manuscript redaction or critical review of its content; final
manuscript approval
SLR
Manuscript redaction or critical review of its content; final
manuscript approval
YS
Statistical analysis; final manuscript approval
MNM
Conception and design study; analysis and/or data
interpretation; manuscript redaction or critical review of its
content; final manuscript approval
SML
Conception and design study; analysis and/or data
interpretation; manuscript redaction or critical review of its
content; final manuscript approval
Authors: K P Alexander; K J Anstrom; L H Muhlbaier; R D Grosswald; P K Smith; R H Jones; E D Peterson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Márcio Roberto Moraes de Carvalho; Nelson Albuquerque de Souza e Silva; Carlos Henrique Klein; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira Journal: Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc Date: 2010 Apr-Jun
Authors: Valquíria Pelisser Campagnucci; Ana Maria Rocha Pinto E Silva; Wilson Lopes Pereira; Eduardo Gregório Chamlian; Sylvio Matheus de Aquino Gandra; Luis Antonio Rivetti Journal: Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc Date: 2008 Apr-Jun
Authors: P Talke; R Chen; B Thomas; A Aggarwall; A Gottlieb; P Thorborg; S Heard; A Cheung; S L Son; A Kallio Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Davy C H Cheng; Claus Wall; George Djaiani; Raul A Peragallo; Jo Carroll; Cindy Li; David Naylor Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Maurício de Nassau Machado; Rafael Carlos Miranda; Isabela Thomaz Takakura; Eduardo Palmegiani; Carlos Alberto dos Santos; Marcos Aurélio Oliveira; Osana M Mouco; Mauro E Hernandes; Maria Angélica Lemos; Lília N Maia Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.000