Literature DB >> 27736295

Computational methods for direct cell conversion.

Uma S Kamaraj1, Julian Gough2, Jose M Polo3, Enrico Petretto1, Owen J L Rackham1.   

Abstract

Directed cell conversion (or transdifferentiation) of one somatic cell-type to another can be achieved by ectopic expression of a set of transcription factors. Since the experimental identification of transcription factors for transdifferentiation is extremely time-consuming and expensive, there are still relatively few transdifferentiations achieved in comparison to the number of human cell-types. However, the growing volume of transcriptional data available and the recent introduction of data-driven algorithmic approaches that predict factors for transdifferentiation holds great promise for accelerating this field. Here we review those computational methods whose in-silico predictions have been experimentally validated, highlighting differences and similarities. Our analysis reveals that the factors predicted by each method tend to be different due to varying source cells used, gene expression quantification and algorithmic steps. We show these differences have an impact on the regulatory influences downstream, with some methods favoring transcription factors regulating developmental progression and others favoring factors regulating mature cell processes. These computational approaches offer a starting point to predict and test novel factors for transdifferentiation. We argue that collecting high-quality gene expression data from single-cells or pure cell-populations across a broader set of cell-types would be necessary to improve the quality and consistency of the in-silico predictions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algorithm; prediction; transcription factor; transdifferentiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27736295      PMCID: PMC5224461          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1238119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  55 in total

1.  Myocardial deletion of transcription factor CHF1/Hey2 results in altered myocyte action potential and mild conduction system expansion but does not alter conduction system function or promote spontaneous arrhythmias.

Authors:  Matthew E Hartman; Yonggang Liu; Wei-Zhong Zhu; Wei-Ming Chien; Chad S Weldy; Glenn I Fishman; Michael A Laflamme; Michael T Chin
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Forward engineering neuronal diversity using direct reprogramming.

Authors:  Rachel K Tsunemoto; Kevin T Eade; Joel W Blanchard; Kristin K Baldwin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Reprogramming adult human dermal fibroblasts to islet-like cells by epigenetic modification coupled to transcription factor modulation.

Authors:  Liora S Katz; Elizabeth Geras-Raaka; Marvin C Gershengorn
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Targeted inhibition of ANKRD1 disrupts sarcomeric ERK-GATA4 signal transduction and abrogates phenylephrine-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.

Authors:  Lin Zhong; Manuel Chiusa; Adrian G Cadar; Angel Lin; Susan Samaras; Jeffrey M Davidson; Chee C Lim
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Loss of both GATA4 and GATA6 blocks cardiac myocyte differentiation and results in acardia in mice.

Authors:  Roong Zhao; Alistair J Watt; Michele A Battle; Jixuan Li; Benjamin J Bondow; Stephen A Duncan
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  The orphan nuclear receptor HNF4alpha determines PXR- and CAR-mediated xenobiotic induction of CYP3A4.

Authors:  Rommel G Tirona; Wooin Lee; Brenda F Leake; Lu-Bin Lan; Cynthia Brimer Cline; Vishal Lamba; Fereshteh Parviz; Stephen A Duncan; Yusuke Inoue; Frank J Gonzalez; Erin G Schuetz; Richard B Kim
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  A predictive computational framework for direct reprogramming between human cell types.

Authors:  Owen J L Rackham; Jaber Firas; Hai Fang; Matt E Oates; Melissa L Holmes; Anja S Knaupp; Harukazu Suzuki; Christian M Nefzger; Carsten O Daub; Jay W Shin; Enrico Petretto; Alistair R R Forrest; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Jose M Polo; Julian Gough
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  CellNet: network biology applied to stem cell engineering.

Authors:  Patrick Cahan; Hu Li; Samantha A Morris; Edroaldo Lummertz da Rocha; George Q Daley; James J Collins
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update.

Authors:  Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Chris Stark; Teresa Reguly; Lorrie Boucher; Ashton Breitkreutz; Michael Livstone; Rose Oughtred; Daniel H Lackner; Jürg Bähler; Valerie Wood; Kara Dolinski; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Reactome pathway knowledgebase.

Authors:  David Croft; Antonio Fabregat Mundo; Robin Haw; Marija Milacic; Joel Weiser; Guanming Wu; Michael Caudy; Phani Garapati; Marc Gillespie; Maulik R Kamdar; Bijay Jassal; Steven Jupe; Lisa Matthews; Bruce May; Stanislav Palatnik; Karen Rothfels; Veronica Shamovsky; Heeyeon Song; Mark Williams; Ewan Birney; Henning Hermjakob; Lincoln Stein; Peter D'Eustachio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Do cells use passwords in cell-state transitions? Is cell signaling sometimes encrypted?

Authors:  Alex Root
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Computational approaches for direct cell reprogramming: from the bulk omics era to the single cell era.

Authors:  Andy Tran; Pengyi Yang; Jean Y H Yang; John Ormerod
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.840

Review 3.  Resurrecting the Dead (Molecules).

Authors:  Jan Zaucha; Jonathan G Heddle
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 4.  Computational approaches for predicting key transcription factors in targeted cell reprogramming (Review).

Authors:  Guillermo-Issac Guerrero-Ramirez; Cesar-Miguel Valdez-Cordoba; Jose-Francisco Islas-Cisneros; Victor Trevino
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  Benchmarking of ATAC Sequencing Data From BGI's Low-Cost DNBSEQ-G400 Instrument for Identification of Open and Occupied Chromatin Regions.

Authors:  Marina Naval-Sanchez; Nikita Deshpande; Minh Tran; Jingyu Zhang; Majid Alhomrani; Walaa Alsanie; Quan Nguyen; Christian M Nefzger
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 6.  Experimental and Computational Approaches to Direct Cell Reprogramming: Recent Advancement and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Rihab Gam; Minkyung Sung; Arun Prasad Pandurangan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.