| Literature DB >> 27735845 |
Ri Gao1,2, Haibin Wang3, Bin Dong4, Xiaodong Yang5, Sumei Chen6, Jiafu Jiang7, Zhaohe Zhang8, Chen Liu9, Nan Zhao10, Fadi Chen11.
Abstract
Autopolyploidy is widespread in higher plants and plays an important role in the process of evolution. The present study successfully induced autotetraploidys from Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium by colchicine. The plant morphology, genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic changes between tetraploid and diploid plants were investigated. Ligulate flower, tubular flower and leaves of tetraploid plants were greater than those of the diploid plants. Compared with diploid plants, the genome changed as a consequence of polyploidization in tetraploid plants, namely, 1.1% lost fragments and 1.6% novel fragments occurred. In addition, DNA methylation increased after genome doubling in tetraploid plants. Among 485 common transcript-derived fragments (TDFs), which existed in tetraploid and diploid progenitors, 62 fragments were detected as differentially expressed TDFs, 6.8% of TDFs exhibited up-regulated gene expression in the tetraploid plants and 6.0% exhibited down-regulation. The present study provides a reference for further studying the autopolyploidization role in the evolution of C. lavandulifolium. In conclusion, the autopolyploid C. lavandulifolium showed a global change in morphology, genome and gene expression compared with corresponding diploid.Entities:
Keywords: AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism); Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium; MSAP (methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism); SRAP (sequence-related amplified polymorphism); morphology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27735845 PMCID: PMC5085722 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17101690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Morphology and chromosome number of diploid and tetraploid Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium: (a–e,k,m,n) diploid plant, leaf, inflorescence, tubular florets, ligulate florets, anatomical structure of leave, cell of palisade tissue first layer, and number of chromosomes of diploid plant; and (f–j,l,o,p) tetraploid plant, leaf, inflorescence, tubular florets, ligulate florets, anatomical structure of leave, cell of palisade tissue first layer, and number of chromosomes of tetraploid plant. up ep, upper epidermis, low ep, lower epidermis, sp, spongy tissue, pa, palisade tissue. (a,f) bars = 5 cm; (b,c,g,h) bars = 10 mm; (d,e,i,j) bars = 2 mm; (m,o) bars = 40 µm; (n,p) bars = 20 µm; and (k,l) bars = 10 µm.
Morphology of diploid and tetraploid Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium.
| Characters | Diploid | Tetraploid |
|---|---|---|
| Plant height (cm) | 83.2 ± 2.2 | 85.13 ± 1.92 |
| Leaf length (cm) | 4.19 ± 0.20 | 4.73 ± 0.21 * |
| Leaf width (cm) | 2.74 ± 0.13 | 3.50 ± 0.21 * |
| Inflorescence diameter (mm) | 16.8 ± 0.24 | 16.65 ± 0.53 |
| Disc flower diameter (mm) | 7.73 ± 0.36 | 8.41 ± 0.25 |
| No. of ligulate florets | 13.11 ± 0.48 * | 10.61 ± 0.86 |
| Ligulate florets dry weight (mg/100) | 0.018 ± 0.0015 | 0.03 ± 0.0012 ** |
| No. of tubular florets | 78.75 ± 1.97 ** | 57.71 ± 1.69 |
| Tubular florets dry weight (mg/100) | 0.015 ± 0.0014 | 0.033 ± 0.0010 ** |
| Palisade thickness (µm) | 43.39 ± 0.33 | 47.83 ± 1.85 * |
| Spongy tissue thickness (µm) | 76.67 ± 1.01 | 85.16 ± 1.41 * |
| Upper epidermis thickness (µm) | 8.51 ± 0.18 | 8.99 ± 0.32 |
| Lower epidermis thickness (µm) | 7.40 ± 0.17 | 6.86 ± 0.17 |
| Leaf thickness (µm) | 136.45 ± 1.16 | 148.84 ± 0.92 * |
| No. Cell (104) | 138.99 ± 22.49 | 161.89 ± 2.91 * |
| Size of cell | 15.17 ± 0.36 | 23.86 ± 0.57 * |
Data are presented as mean ± standard * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 levels, based on t-test.
Figure 2DNA-SRAP profiling of diploid and tetraploid of C. lavandulifolium: Upper panel represents primer combinations. 2X indicates diploid, and 4X indicates tetraploid. “→” to red arrows represents novel bands and blue arrows represent lost bands in the tetraploid. E# represents the em# primer, M# indicates me# primers. Bands detected range from 100 to 500 bp.
Figure 3Typical cDNA-AFLP profiles of the diploid and the tetraploid. Upper panel represents primer combinations. 2X indicates diploid, and 4X indicates tetraploid plants. “→” to red arrows represent up-regulated genes and blue arrows represent down-regulated genes in tetraploid plants. Bands detected range from 100 to 500 bp.
Figure 4Representative variation in MSAP profiles. “→” to red arrows represents variation in DNA methylation between diploid and tetraploid plants; “+” represents fragments obtained after digestion with EcoR I or Hpa II/Msp I; “−” represents fragments not digested by EcoR I or Hpa II/Msp I; Type I fragments are nonmethylated and were presented in both the H (EcoR I or Hpa II digest) and M (EcoR I or Msp I digest) lanes; Type II are fully methylated and only appeared in the M lanes; Type III are hemimethylated and appeared in the H lanes; Type IV were fragments absent from both H and M lanes in diploid but present in either H or M lane of tetraploid, and vice versa.
Level of cytosine methylation in the autopolyploid.
| Plant Lines | Total Sites | Nonmethylated Type I | Methylated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type II | Type III | Total (II + III) | |||
| Diploid | 260 | 61 (23.5%) | 114 (43.8%) | 85 (32.7%) | 199 (76.5%) |
| Tetraploid | 251 | 52 (20.7%) | 109 (43.4%) | 90 (35.9%) | 199 (79.3%) |
Sataus of cytosine methylation in the autopolyploid.
| Fragment Type | Fragment Display Pattern in MSAP Gel | Number of Sites | Sataus | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2X | 4X | 2X H lane | 2X M lane | 4X H lane | 4X M lane | 2 | ↓ |
| Type IV | Type I | − | − | + | + | 0 | ↓ |
| Type I | Type IV | + | + | − | − | 2 | ↑ |
| Type IV | Type III | − | − | + | − | 7 | ↓ |
| Type III | Type IV | + | − | − | − | 12 | ↑ |
| Type IV | Type II | − | − | − | + | 4 | ↓ |
| Type II | Type IV | − | + | − | − | 5 | ↑ |
| Type II | Type I | − | + | + | + | 4 | ↓ |
| Type I | Type II | + | + | − | + | 5 | ↑ |
| Type III | Type I | + | − | + | + | 1 | ↓ |
| Type I | Type III | + | + | + | − | 13 | ↑ |
MSAP indicates methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism; “↓”decreased methylation, “↑” increased methylation.