Prabitha Natarajan1, Jingchun Liu1, Manjula Santhanakrishnan1, David R Gibb1, Lewis M Slater2, Jeanne E Hendrickson1,3. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Hematology-Oncology Section, Medicine Health Care Group Long Beach Veterans Affairs, and Division of Hematology-Oncology and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few therapeutic options currently exist to prevent or to mitigate transfusion-associated red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization. We hypothesized that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor currently being utilized for HLA alloantibody and ADAMTS13 autoantibody reduction, may be beneficial in a transfusion setting. Herein, we utilized a reductionist murine model to test our hypothesis that bortezomib would decrease RBC alloimmune responses. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Wild-type mice were treated with bortezomib or saline and transfused with murine RBCs expressing the human KEL glycoprotein. Levels of anti-KEL immunoglobulins in transfusion recipients were measured by flow cytometry. The impact of bortezomib treatment on recipient plasma cells (PCs) and other immune cells was also assessed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. RESULTS: After bortezomib treatment, mice had a 50% reduction in splenic white blood cells and a targeted reduction in marrow PCs. Mice treated with bortezomib before the transfusion of KEL RBCs became alloimmunized in three of three experiments, although their serum anti-KEL IgG levels were 2.6-fold lower than those in untreated mice. Once a primary antibody response was established, bortezomib treatment did not prevent an anamnestic response from occurring. CONCLUSION: To the extent that these findings are generalizable to other RBC antigens and to humans, bortezomib monotherapy is unlikely to be of significant clinical benefit in a transfusion setting where complete prevention of alloimmunization is desirable. Given the impact on PCs, however, it remains plausible that bortezomib therapy may be beneficial for RBC alloimmunization prevention or mitigation if used in combination with other immunomodulatory therapies.
BACKGROUND: Few therapeutic options currently exist to prevent or to mitigate transfusion-associated red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization. We hypothesized that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor currently being utilized for HLA alloantibody and ADAMTS13 autoantibody reduction, may be beneficial in a transfusion setting. Herein, we utilized a reductionist murine model to test our hypothesis that bortezomib would decrease RBC alloimmune responses. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Wild-type mice were treated with bortezomib or saline and transfused with murine RBCs expressing the humanKEL glycoprotein. Levels of anti-KEL immunoglobulins in transfusion recipients were measured by flow cytometry. The impact of bortezomib treatment on recipient plasma cells (PCs) and other immune cells was also assessed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. RESULTS: After bortezomib treatment, mice had a 50% reduction in splenic white blood cells and a targeted reduction in marrow PCs. Mice treated with bortezomib before the transfusion of KEL RBCs became alloimmunized in three of three experiments, although their serum anti-KELIgG levels were 2.6-fold lower than those in untreated mice. Once a primary antibody response was established, bortezomib treatment did not prevent an anamnestic response from occurring. CONCLUSION: To the extent that these findings are generalizable to other RBC antigens and to humans, bortezomib monotherapy is unlikely to be of significant clinical benefit in a transfusion setting where complete prevention of alloimmunization is desirable. Given the impact on PCs, however, it remains plausible that bortezomib therapy may be beneficial for RBC alloimmunization prevention or mitigation if used in combination with other immunomodulatory therapies.
Authors: Kamal M Khanna; David A Blair; Anthony T Vella; Stephen J McSorley; Sandip K Datta; Leo Lefrançois Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: William Robert Morrow; Elizabeth A Frazier; William T Mahle; Terry O Harville; Sherry E Pye; Kenneth R Knecht; Emily L Howard; R Neal Smith; Robert L Saylors; Xiomara Garcia; Robert D B Jaquiss; E Steve Woodle Journal: Transplantation Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Priyank P Patel; Joanne Becker; Craig Freyer; Elizabeth Griffiths; James E Thompson; Eunice S Wang Journal: Transfusion Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ercan Cacan; Alexander M Spring; Anita Kumari; Susanna F Greer; Charlie Garnett-Benson Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: K K Starheim; T Holien; K Misund; I Johansson; K A Baranowska; A-M Sponaas; H Hella; G Buene; A Waage; A Sundan; G Bjørkøy Journal: Blood Cancer J Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 11.037