Faisal Inayat1, Abu Hurairah2. 1. Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Abstract
The objective of this investigation was to study the gastrointestinal and hepatic involvement in hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Gastrointestinal or hepatic involvement is estimated to affect up to one-third of patients with HES, although most of the clinical evidence has been derived from case reports. In literature, HES presenting with hepatitis and jaundice with subsequent development of colitis is a rare clinicopathologic entity. Given the clinical implications, physicians should include HES among differentials in these types of presentations.
The objective of this investigation was to study the gastrointestinal and hepatic involvement in hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Gastrointestinal or hepatic involvement is estimated to affect up to one-third of patients with HES, although most of the clinical evidence has been derived from case reports. In literature, HES presenting with hepatitis and jaundice with subsequent development of colitis is a rare clinicopathologic entity. Given the clinical implications, physicians should include HES among differentials in these types of presentations.
Hardy and Anderson first described the term hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) in 1968. It is
characterized by sustained eosinophilic overproduction [1]. HES is a rare disease that usually occurs in 20–50-year-old individuals. It is
categorized as primary due to neoplasm, secondary or reactive and idiopathic. HES can
involve any organ, and it has been noted in one retrospective multicenter study that it
involves the skin in 37%, the lungs in 25%, the gastrointestinal tract in 14%, the heart in
five percent, and the central nervous system in four percent of the cases [2].Idiopathic HES was first defined by Chusid, et al. [3] as the sustained elevation of eosinophil count more than 1500 cells/mL for more
than six months with single or multiorgan dysfunction due to cytotoxic injury by
eosinophils and the absence of identifiable etiology of elevated eosinophils [3]. It is a diagnosis of exclusion, which needs
extensive workup and requires both invasive and noninvasive investigations to establish the
diagnosis.Herein, we would like to share an interesting case of a patient with idiopathic HES who
presented with hepatitis and jaundice with subsequent development of colitis. We undertook
the discussion of important clinical implications associated with gastrointestinal and
hepatic involvement in HES. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for this
study.
Case presentation
A 20-year-old male presented to our institution with a seven-month history of progressively
worsening jaundice. The patient denied abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. His past
medical history was unremarkable with no preexisting gastrointestinal or liver illnesses. He
had not recently taken any medication. The patient was a nonsmoker, nonalcoholic, and he did
not have a history of illicit substance use. The physical exam was unremarkable other than a
malnourished physique with a BMI of 18.6 (normal, 18.5–24.9).The initial laboratory studies revealed alanine transaminase 1204 IU/L (normal, 10–40
IU/L), aspartate transaminase 721 IU/L (normal, 5–40 IU/L), serum alkaline phosphatase 153
IU/L (normal, 32–92 IU/L), total bilirubin 9.7 mg/dL (normal, 0.3–1.2 mg/dL), and
international normalized ratio (INR) 1.24 (normal, 0.8–1.2). The complete blood count was as
follows: WBC 25,200/mm3, hemoglobin 12.6 g/dL, platelets 499,000/mm3, eosinophils
67%, absolute total eosinophils 16,884/mm3. The serum IgG level was 1620 mg/dL
(normal, 700–1600 mg/dL). The patient had no evidence of allergic or hypersensitivity
conditions or connective tissue diseases based on bronchoscopy, pulmonary function tests,
and serologic tests. A transthoracic echocardiogram was unremarkable. A bone marrow biopsy
for neoplastic or primary bone marrow disorders showed marked eosinophilia, but no other
abnormalities.A workup for infectious causes demonstrated negative results for viral markers (hepatitis
A, B, C, E, adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, and human immunodeficiency virus), serum antibodies
to helminth (worm) parasites, autoimmune antibodies (antinuclear, anti-dsDNA, and
anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies), tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein, carbohydrate
antigen 19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen), and rheumatoid factor. No pathogens were
detected in a microbiological blood culture, and the stool examinations for parasites and
protozoa were negative. The flow cytometry was normal.A computed tomography scan of the abdomen demonstrated a thick-walled gallbladder with a
rim of pericholecystic fluid present in the gallbladder fossa with a normal-appearing liver
(Figure 1).
Figure 1
A Computed Tomography Scan of the Abdomen
The arrow demarcates a thick-walled gallbladder with a rim of pericholecystic fluid
present in the gallbladder fossa with a normal-appearing liver.
A Computed Tomography Scan of the Abdomen
The arrow demarcates a thick-walled gallbladder with a rim of pericholecystic fluid
present in the gallbladder fossa with a normal-appearing liver.Furthermore, the colon showed a loss of normal mucosal pattern with no visible
haustrations. The rectum had a normal wall thickness, and the perirectal fat planes appeared
to be preserved (Figure 2).
Figure 2
A Computed Tomography Scan of the Pelvis
The arrows show loss of normal mucosal pattern with an ahaustral appearance of the
colon with normal wall thickness of the rectum. The perirectal fat planes appeared to
be preserved.
A Computed Tomography Scan of the Pelvis
The arrows show loss of normal mucosal pattern with an ahaustral appearance of the
colon with normal wall thickness of the rectum. The perirectal fat planes appeared to
be preserved.A flexible sigmoidoscopy exam was performed to assess colonic tissues following radiologic
manifestations. It revealed mild inflammatory changes, multiple mucosal erosions, and patchy
erythema (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Sigmoidoscopy
A colonoscopy image showing mild inflammatory changes, mucosal edema, and patchy
erythema.
Sigmoidoscopy
A colonoscopy image showing mild inflammatory changes, mucosal edema, and patchy
erythema.In addition to the other findings on colonoscopy, the loss of vascularity was evident.
These findings were consistent with mildly-active chronic colitis (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Sigmoidoscopy
A colonoscopy image showing mild inflammatory changes, mucosal edema, patchy
erythema, and loss of vascularity consistent with mildly-active chronic colitis.
A colonoscopy image showing mild inflammatory changes, mucosal edema, patchy
erythema, and loss of vascularity consistent with mildly-active chronic colitis.The colonic biopsy was not obtained due to friability of mucosa and the potential risk of
perforation.On day 4 of admission, a repeat blood workup showed a white cell count of
23,700/mm3 with eosinophils 67% and an absolute total eosinophil count of
15,879/mm3. The liver function tests were markedly elevated. On hospital day 5,
a liver biopsy was pursued to investigate the possibility of autoimmune hepatitis based on
the laboratory abnormalities. The histopathologic analysis of the liver specimen revealed
chronic active hepatitis with significant eosinophilic infiltration in the portal triad, but
no interface activity or rosette formation was evident. The surrounding periportal
hepatocytes showed mild steatosis (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Liver Biopsy
The biopsy image reveals significant eosinophilic infiltration in the portal triad.
The surrounding periportal hepatocytes show mild steatosis.
Liver Biopsy
The biopsy image reveals significant eosinophilic infiltration in the portal triad.
The surrounding periportal hepatocytes show mild steatosis.On high power view of the liver biopsy, infiltrating eosinophils were found with mild
cholestasis presenting as intrahepatocytic bile pigment (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Liver Biopsy
The high power view of the liver biopsy demonstrates infiltrating eosinophils with
steatosis and mild cholestasis presenting as intrahepatocytic bile pigment.
The high power view of the liver biopsy demonstrates infiltrating eosinophils with
steatosis and mild cholestasis presenting as intrahepatocytic bile pigment.Based on the calculator from the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group, the patient’s
clinical picture was not consistent with a definitive diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis.
Given the significant presence of eosinophils, the patient most likely had chronic hepatitis
secondary to HES.Eventually, the patient was diagnosed with idiopathic HES based on the persistent elevation
in eosinophil count for more than six months, an otherwise negative workup as described
above, and evidence of end-organ involvement of the liver, gallbladder, and colon. The
patient was initiated on prednisone 60 mg/day. He showed a dramatic response to the
prednisone therapy with normalization of eosinophil count within three weeks. The liver
enzymes normalized after six weeks of therapy. Subsequently, the prednisone dose was
gradually tapered. Since then, the patient has been disease free and continues to do well on
regular follow-ups with serum troponin level measurements every three to six months and
echocardiography and pulmonary function tests every six to 12 months.
Discussion
Idiopathic HES is defined as a persistent absolute eosinophil count >1500/mm3
for more than six months with evidence of end-organ dysfunction due to
hypereosinophilia and exclusion of other primary or secondary causes of hypereosinophilia
[4]. Patients with HES usually present with
nonspecific symptoms or without symptoms [5]. In the
majority of cases, it was shown that hematologic, cardiovascular, cutaneous, and neurologic
systems have a relatively higher predilection to be affected in patients with HES [6].As is clear from the definition of HES, it involves the hematologic system in all cases.
Neutrophilia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, venous thrombosis, and splenomegaly may constitute
additional symptoms in such cases [5-6]. Significant morbidity and mortality has been
associated with HES cases with cardiovascular involvement [6]. The neurologic complications of HES include encephalopathy, peripheral
neuropathy, and thromboembolic events of the central nervous system [6]. Cutaneous lesions seen in HES include urticaria and angioedema or
erythematous pruritic papules and nodules with biopsies showing a range of findings
including eosinophilic vasculitis or nonspecific inflammatory infiltration [6].Gastrointestinal involvement in HES is well established. Eosinophilic gastritis,
enterocolitis, or colitis may be present. Pancreatitis and sclerosing cholangitis occur
rarely [6]. However, the initial clinical
manifestations are not as well-defined and the majority of the data consists of case reports
and case series. When the gastrointestinal tract is involved, patients may present with
diarrhea, nausea, or abdominal cramps with subsequent biopsies showing eosinophilic
infiltration and stool examination showing Charcot-Leyden crystals [5]. However, our patient initially presented with jaundice, and the
sigmoidoscopy showed signs of chronic colitis. After the exclusion of potential etiologies,
the symptoms in our patient were attributed to idiopathic HES.Hepatic involvement in HES has been reported in up to one-third of patients and typically
presents as hepatomegaly or mild abnormalities in liver chemistry studies [5]. The Budd-Chiari syndrome from hepatic vein
obstruction may manifest following hepatic involvement in HES [6]. However, clinically relevant liver disease is less common, but
isolated cases have been reported with patients presenting with hepatocellular damage due to
chronic active hepatitis [7-8]. Hepatitis associated with HES has frequently been designated as
chronic active hepatitis, eosinophilic hepatitis, and hepatitis associated with HES [8].There are previous studies involving patients with HES who were initially suspected to have
acute hepatitis, but were eventually diagnosed with chronic hepatitis based on additional
biopsy findings after undergoing steroid therapy [8]. In addition, Minola and Sonzogni reported a case of acute hepatitis in a patient
with eosinophilic infiltration in the lung, which was finally proven to be chronic hepatitis
[9]. Additional cases have been described in
patients with hypereosinophilia and liver biopsies showing acute hepatitis, but in the
setting of suspected IgG4-related disease [10].
Hence, as in the present case, HES may cause chronic liver injury.
Conclusions
The present study highlights a unique case of a patient who meets the WHO diagnostic
criteria for idiopathic HES with evidence of liver, gallbladder, and colon involvement. The
patient had gastrointestinal involvement with no clinical evidence of the more commonly
affected pulmonary, neurologic, or integumentary system dysfunction. Additionally, this
patient had chronic active hepatitis related to the HES that may have otherwise been masked
by the suspicion for autoimmune hepatitis based on serologic workup. Therefore, idiopathic
HES may be considered among the differentials in cases with chronic active hepatitis,
jaundice, and watery diarrhea.
Authors: Princess U Ogbogu; Bruce S Bochner; Joseph H Butterfield; Gerald J Gleich; Johannes Huss-Marp; Jean Emmanuel Kahn; Kristin M Leiferman; Thomas B Nutman; Florian Pfab; Johannes Ring; Marc E Rothenberg; Florence Roufosse; Marie-Helene Sajous; Javed Sheikh; Dagmar Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Miguel L Stein; Andrew Wardlaw; Peter F Weller; Amy D Klion Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 10.793