| Literature DB >> 27733859 |
Concha Domingo1, Eric Lalanne2, María M Catalá3, Eva Pla3, Juan L Reig-Valiente1, Manuel Talón1.
Abstract
Salinity is a complex trait that affects growth and productivity in many crops, including rice. Mutation induction, a useful tool to generate salt tolerant plants, enables the analysis of plants with similar genetic background, facilitating the understanding of the salt tolerance mechanisms. In this work, we generated three salt tolerant mutant lines by irradiation of a salt-sensitive cultivar plants and screened M2 plants at seedling stage in the presence of high salinity. These three lines, SaT20, SaS62, and SaT58, showed different responses to salinity, but exhibited similar phenotype to wild type plants, except SaT20 that displayed shorter height when grown in the absence of salt. Under salt conditions, all three mutants and the parental line showed similar reduction in yield, although relevant differences in other physiological parameters, such as Na+ accumulation in healthy leaves of SaT20, were registered. Microarray analyses of gene expression profiles in roots revealed the occurrence of common and specific responses in the mutants. The three mutants showed up-regulation of responsive genes, the activation of oxido-reduction process and the inhibition of ion transport. The participation of jasmonate in the plant response to salt was evident by down-regulation of a gene coding for a jasmonate O-methyltransferase. Genes dealing with lipid transport and metabolism were, in general, up-regulated except in SaS62, that also exhibited down-regulation of genes involved in ion transport and Ca2+ signal transduction. The two most tolerant varieties, SaS62 and SaT20, displayed lower levels of transcripts involved in K+ uptake. The physiological study and the description of the expression analysis evidenced that the three lines showed different responses to salt: SaT20 showed a high Na+ content in leaves, SaS62 presented an inhibition of lipid metabolism and ion transport and SaT58 differs in both features in the response to salinity. The analysis of these salt tolerant mutants illustrates the complexity of this trait evidencing the breadth of the plant responses to salinity including simultaneous cooperation of alternative or complementary mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: abiotic stress; microarray hybridization; mutant; rice; salt tolerance
Year: 2016 PMID: 27733859 PMCID: PMC5039197 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1.
Cation content (as percentage of total cation content of the leaves and roots), and K/Na ratio and Cl.
| Bahia | 2.91 ± 0.10b | 4.04 ± 0.04a | 1.40 ± 0.04b |
| SaT58a | 2.85 ± 0.07b | 4.27 ± 0.09b | 1.50 ± 0.01b |
| SaS62c | 1.89 ± 0.04a | 4.09 ± 0.00ab | 2.17 ± 0.04c |
| SaT20b | 7.63 ± 0.13c | 4.22 ± 0.08b | 0.55 ± 0.02a |
| Bahia | 4.12 ± 0.14b | 1.21 ± 0.08ab | 0.29 ± 0.01b |
| SaT58a | 4.24 ± 0.08b | 1.25 ± 0.01b | 0.30 ± 0.01b |
| SaS62c | 3.44 ± 0.01a | 1.47 ± 0.00c | 0.43 ± 0.00c |
| SaT20b | 4.33 ± 0.00b | 1.06 ± 0.00a | 0.24 ± 0.00a |
| Bahia | 62.33 ± 0.67c | 46.33 ± 0.33a | |
| SaT58a | 50.50 ± 2.63b | 50.67 ± 0.67b | |
| SaS62c | 41.83 ± 0.31a | 51.52 ± 0.58b | |
| SaT20b | 125.67 ± 0.92d | 51.67 ± 0.88b | |
Standard error is indicated. Identical letters in each panel show no statistical differences at 0.05 significance level based on Duncan's multiple range test.
Figure 2Mean and standard errors of (A) height, (B) number of panicle per square meter, (C) number of grains per panicle, and (D) number of filled grains per panicle and (E) yield of plants grown in fields under non-salt (solid bars) and salt (open bars) conditions. The same letter in bars within each genotype indicates no significant difference at 0.05 significance level based on Duncan's multiple range test. Upper case letters refer to non-salt treatment, while lower case letters refer to salt treatment.
Figure 3Venn diagram (A) showing the number of salt-responsive transcripts that changed in roots of . (B) k-means clustering of the expression change pattern across the roots of plants from the SaT58, SaS62, and SaT20 lines treated with 120 mM NaCl.
GO term enrichment analysis on differentially expressed genes from the expression change pattern analysis across the roots of plants from the .
| GO:0055085 | Transmembrane transport | 14 | ||
| GO:0006811 | Ion transport | 9 | 9 | |
| GO:0006869 | Lipid transport | 8 | ||
| GO:0055114 | Oxidation-reduction process | 77 | ||
| GO:0006629 | Lipid metabolic process | 40 | ||
| GO:0019748 | Secondary metabolic process | 40 | ||
| GO:0006950 | Response to stress | 144 | ||
| GO:0009628 | Response to abiotic stimulus | 84 | ||
| GO:0009651 | Response to salt stress | 10 | 19 | |
| GO:0009607 | Response to biotic stimulus | 48 | ||
| GO:0006952 | Defense response | 14 | ||
| GO:0006979 | Response to oxidative stress | 22 | 9 | |
| GO:0046686 | Response to cadmium ion | 10 | 20 | |
| GO:0007154 | Cell communication | 15 |
Distribution of transcripts significantly regulated in salt-stressed roots of .
| GO:0006811 | Ion transport | 23 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| GO:0006869 | Lipid transport | 19 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 2 |
| GO:0055114 | Oxidation reduction | 124 | 36 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 50 | 31 |
| GO:0006629 | Lipid metabolic process | 66 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 25 | 12 |
| GO:0019748 | Secondary metabolic process | 55 | 26 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 32 | 6 |
| GO:0009628 | Response to abiotic stress | 151 | 43 | 11 | 17 | 29 | 56 | 35 |
| GO:0009607 | Response to biotic stress | 85 | 31 | 7 | 4 | 16 | 26 | 19 |
| GO:0006952 | Defense response | 43 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 14 | 13 |
| GO:0006979 | Response to oxidative stress | 38 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 9 |
| GO:0006091 | generation of precursor metabolites and energy | 36 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 13 |
Differentially regulated genes involved in ion transport and calcium signal transduction, based on microarray analyses, in salt-stressed roots of tolerant mutant lines compared to sensitive parental Bahia.
| LOC_Os04g36740 | Potassium channel SKOR | −1.19(6.0E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os04g58620 | Potasium efflux antiporter protein | −0.97(1.6E-03) | ||
| LOC_Os09g12790 | Potassium channel protein | −0.70(2.3E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os12g42200 | ATCHX | −0.72(7.1E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os08g10550 | Potassium transporter | −0.98(1.2E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os01g45990 | Potassium channel AKT1 | 0.78(1.0E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os08g32650 | Cation efflux family protein | −0.81(1.0E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os12g44360 | Sodium/hydrogen exchanger 7 | −1.1(9.5E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os11g42790 | Transporter, monovalent cation:proton antiporter-2 family | −0.97(7.5E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os02g08018 | Calcium-transporting ATPase 9, plasma membrane-type | −1.08(2.0E-05) | −0.76(6.5E-05) | |
| LOC_Os03g17310 | Calcium-transporting ATPase, endoplasmic reticulum-type | −1.12(2.8E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os07g33790 | Glutamate receptor 3.4 precursor | −1.09(2.6E-03) | ||
| LOC_Os02g54760 | Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 14 | −0.77(2.0E-03) | ||
| LOC_Os01g74110 | Similar to Zinc transporter 2 precursor (ZRT/IRT-like protein 2) | −0.74(1.2E-04) | −1.48(2.0E-05) | −0.84(2.2E-04) |
| LOC_Os06g46310 | Metal transporter Nramp6 | −0.86(5.1E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os07g15370 | Metal transporter Nramp6 | −1.19(3.6E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os01g68040 | CorA-like magnesium transporter protein | −1.37(5.7E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os05g47980 | ATP synthase, putative | −2.24(2.5E-06) | ||
| LOC_Os11g06890 | Vacuolar ATP synthase, putative | −1.21(1.4E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os04g45520 | Integral membrane protein | −1.75(4.7E-06) | ||
| LOC_Os04g59020 | Integral membrane protein | −0.99(3.0E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os01g56420 | Ctr copper transporter family protein | −0.71(2.1E-03) | ||
| LOC_Os06g36450 | Ferroportin1 domain containing protein | −0.7(9E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os07g48780 | OsCam1-2 - Calmodulin | −1.66(1.6E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os11g04560 | Calmodulin-like protein 1 | 0.80(3.8E-05) | 0.98(5.3E-05) | |
| LOC_Os08g02420 | OsCML7−Calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein | −0.71(9.0E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os11g44630 | Calmodulin binding protein | −0.89(1.1E-04) | −1.02(1.1E-03) | |
| LOC_Os03g32160 | Calmodulin binding protein | −0.70(1.2E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os01g69910 | Calmodulin-binding transcription activator | −0.82(8.8E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os01g51840 | IQ calmodulin-binding motif family protein | −0.82(1.8E-03) | ||
| LOC_Os02g19640 | IQ calmodulin-binding motif family protein | 0.79(4.3E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os01g67090 | IQ calmodulin-binding motif domain containing protein | 1.11(3.0E-05) | 0.72(1.1E-04) | 0.91(5.5E-05) |
| LOC_Os01g51420 | Calcineurin B | −0.99(1.2E-04) | −0.89(5.7E-05) | −0.70(2.4E-04) |
| LOC_Os03g33570 | Calcineurin B-like protein 8 | −0.86(1.0E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os10g41510 | Calcineurin B | −0.81(4.5E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os04g47300 | CAMK_CAMK_like.26 | 1.01(1.2E-03) | ||
| LOC_Os03g22050 | CAMK_KIN1/SNF1/Nim1_like.16 | −0.72(8.0E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os06g35160 | CAMK_KIN1/SNF1/Nim1_like.26−SOS2-like | −0.86(6.9E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os12g03810 | CAMK_KIN1/SNF1/Nim1_like.37 | 0.95(1.8E-04) | ||
| LOC_Os11g03970 | CAMK_KIN1/SNF1/Nim1_like.5 | 1.20(6.4E-05) | ||
| LOC_Os01g66890 | BTBZ1−Bric-a-Brac, Tramtrack, and Broad Complex BTB domain with TAZ zinc finger and Calmodulin-binding domains | −0.72(4.6E-04) | ||
The expression levels are indicated as log2(mutant line/Bahia). P-values are indicated in parentheses.
Figure 4Comparison between gene expression in . Genes analyzed were: Monovalent cation:oxidoreductase- aldo/keto reductase family protein (aldo/keto reductase) (AKR) (LOC_Os04g27060), proton antiporter-2 (LOC_Os11g42790), enolase (LOC_Os06g04510), jasmonate O-methyltransferase (JMT) (LOC_Os06g21760), potassium channel SKOR (LOC_Os04g36740), peroxidase precursor (LOC_Os07g48010), thionin-7 (LOC_Os06g32160).
Figure 5Comparison between gene expression in . Genes analyzed were: OsRCI2-7 (LOC_Os05g03130), enolase (LOC_Os06g04510), monovalent cation:proton antiporter-2 (LOC_Os11g42790), peroxidase precursor (LOC_Os07g48010), and tyrosine protein kinase domain containing protein (TPK) (LOC_Os03g06330).
Differentially regulated genes involved in ion transport in salt-stressed leaves of .
| LOC_Os06g14030 | Potassium channel SKOR | −0.97(1.2E-04) |
| LOC_Os06g48800 | OsHKT2;4 - K+/Na+ transporter | −1.24(3.4E-05) |
| LOC_Os06g15910 | Potassium transporter | −1.48(8.9E-06) |
| LOC_Os02g49760 | Potassium transporter | −0.76(4.6E-05) |
| LOC_Os04g32920 | Potassium transporter | 0.85(5.2E-05) |
| LOC_Os11g42790 | Transporter. monovalent cation:proton antiporter-2 family | −1.18(1.6E-05) |
| LOC_Os07g47100 | Transporter. monovalent cation:proton antiporter-2 family | −1.33(1.8E-05) |
| LOC_Os08g42110 | Similar to cation cation antiporter. | 0.94(2.1E-04) |
| LOC_Os03g45370 | Sodium/calcium exchanger protein | −0.98(5.7E-05) |
| LOC_Os03g55100 | Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel 2, putative | −0.94(1.2E-04) |
| LOC_Os04g32050 | Iron-phytosiderophore transporter | −0.88(2.7E-05) |
| LOC_Os05g31750 | Annexin. putative. expressed | −0.75(5.5E-05) |
| LOC_Os02g14980 | Calcium-binding EF hand family protein | −0.72(1.0E-04) |
| LOC_Os11g05010 | Heavy-metal-associated domain-containing protein | 0.77(1.2E-03) |
| LOC_Os08g10630 | Similar to Zinc transporter ZIP1 (Fragment) | 1.06(1.4E-04) |
| LOC_Os01g03914 | Cation efflux family protein | −0.72(2.3E-05) |
| LOC_Os02g38020 | Inorganic phosphate transporter 2-1, chloroplast precursor | −0.85(5.0E-05) |
| LOC_Os03g06520 | Sulfate transporter | −1.17(2.1E-05) |
| LOC_Os03g27040 | Heavy metal-associated domain containing protein | −0.82(3.7E-05) |
| LOC_Os03g48000 | CorA-like magnesium transporter protein | −0.83(3.8E-05) |
| LOC_Os06g48060 | ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein | −1.01(3.2E-04) |
| LOC_Os12g25200 | Chloride transporter, chloride channel family | −0.89(2.4E-04) |
The expression levels in leaves are indicated as log2(SaT20/Bahia). P-values are indicated in parentheses.