| Literature DB >> 27733762 |
Ramsy Agha1, Manja Saebelfeld1,2, Christin Manthey1, Thomas Rohrlack3, Justyna Wolinska1,2.
Abstract
Parasites are rarely included in food web studies, although they can strongly alter trophic interactions. In aquatic ecosystems, poorly grazed cyanobacteria often dominate phytoplankton communities, leading to the decoupling of primary and secondary production. Here, we addressed the interface between predator-prey and host-parasite interactions by conducting a life-table experiment, in which four Daphnia galeata genotypes were maintained on quantitatively comparable diets consisting of healthy cyanobacteria or cyanobacteria infected by a fungal (chytrid) parasite. In four out of five fitness parameters, at least one Daphnia genotype performed better on parasitised cyanobacteria than in the absence of infection. Further treatments consisting of purified chytrid zoospores and heterotrophic bacteria suspensions established the causes of improved fitness. First, Daphnia feed on chytrid zoospores which trophically upgrade cyanobacterial carbon. Second, an increase in heterotrophic bacterial biomass, promoted by cyanobacterial decay, provides an additional food source for Daphnia. In addition, chytrid infection induces fragmentation of cyanobacterial filaments, which could render cyanobacteria more edible. Our results demonstrate that chytrid parasitism can sustain zooplankton under cyanobacterial bloom conditions, and exemplify the potential of parasites to alter interactions between trophic levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27733762 PMCID: PMC5062065 DOI: 10.1038/srep35039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Final carbon concentrations, and filament, zoospore and heterotrophic bacteria densities supplied to Daphnia in each feeding treatment.
| Treatment | Carbon (mg l−1) | Filaments (ml−1) | Zoospores (ml−1) | Bacteria (106 ml−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyn | 1.01 ± 0.020 | 1,901 ± 100 | — | 0.75 ± 0.06 |
| Inf | 0.80 ± 0.090 | 1,582 ± 171 | 2,433 ± 285 | 4.42 ± 0.30 |
| Zoo | 0.09 ± 0.005 | — | 2,182 ± 263 | 4.45 ± 0.23 |
| Bac | 0.08 ± 0.004 | — | — | 4.24 ± 0.20 |
Cyn: uninfected cyanobacteria, Inf: infected cyanobacteria, Zoo: zoospores, Bac: heterotrophic bacteria. Data are shown as means (± s.e.m.) of all feeding occasions (n = 11).
Figure 1Mean length of cyanobacteria filaments.
Data are shown as mean filament lengths (±s.e.m.) in each feeding suspension (n = 11). Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences between treatments (χ2 = 13.772, p = 0.0002) Cyn: uninfected cyanobacteria, Inf: infected cyanobacteria.
Effect of different food treatments on Daphnia fitness parameters.
| Two-way ANOVA | Genotype | Contrast test | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Cyn vs. Inf | Cyn vs. Zoo | Cyn vs. Bac | Inf vs. Zoo | Inf vs. Bac | Zoo vs. Bac | Cyn | Inf | Zoo | Bac | |
| Mugg6b | 0.051 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 7 | |||
| Mugg7a | 0.658 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.139 | 0.658 | 1.0 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 13 | |
| Mugg11c | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.166 | 0.695 | 1.0 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 9 | |
| Mugg13c | 0.207 | 0.612 | 0.369 | 0.369 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 11 | |||
| Mugg6b | 0.869 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 6 | ||||||
| Mugg7a | 0.871 | 0.871 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 6 | |||||
| Mugg11c | 0.485 | 0.085 | 12 | 12 | 7 | 3 | |||||
| Mugg13c | 0.306 | 0.306 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 7 | |||||
| Mugg6b | 13 | 12 | 14 | 6 | |||||||
| Mugg7a | 0.213 | 0.396 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 6 | |||||
| Mugg11c | 0.084 | 12 | 12 | 7 | 3 | ||||||
| Mugg13c | 0.953 | 0.953 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 7 | |||||
| Mugg6b | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.288 | 1.0 | 0.250 | 0.288 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 6 | |
| Mugg7a | 0.093 | 0.093 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 6 | |||||
| Mugg11c | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 12 | 12 | 7 | 3 | |
| Mugg13c | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.703 | 1.0 | 0.259 | 0.943 | 14 | 9 | 8 | 7 | |
| Mugg6b | 0.451 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 4 | ||||||
| Mugg7a | 0.115 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | ||||||
| Mugg11c | 0.290 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 5 | ||||||
| Mugg13c | 0.236 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 10 | ||||||
Results of two-way ANOVAs (for effects of t treatment, g genotype and t:g treatment by genotype interaction) followed by contrast tests (comparisons between treatments within genotypes) are shown. The number of replicates (n) included in each comparison is given. Discrepancies in number of replicates between parameters resulted from unmeasurable animals (see Methods). Significant p-values are depicted in bold. Cyn: uninfected cyanobacteria, Inf: infected cyanobacteria, Zoo: zoospores, Bac: heterotrophic bacteria.
*data are not normally distributed but show equal variances of the residuals (see Methods).
1data(1/2) transformed.
2data(−4) transformed.
Figure 2Fitness parameters of Daphnia genotypes fed with different diets.
(a) Age at maturity, (b) fecundity, (c) growth rate, (d) body size of adults, (e) body size of offspring. Data are shown as means (±s.e.m.). Significant differences between treatments within genotypes (Mugg6b, Mugg7a, Mugg11c, Mugg13c) are indicated by different lowercase letters. Cyn: uninfected cyanobacteria, Inf: infected cyanobacteria, Zoo: zoospores, Bac: heterotrophic bacteria. The respective n are shown in Table 2.
Figure 3Number of replicates of each Daphnia genotype that reached the third reproductive cycle when fed with zoospores (Zoo) and heterotrophic bacteria (Bac) suspensions.
Significant differences are highlighted by p-values in bold (Fisher’s exact test) (n.s.: not significant). Comparisons of infected and uninfected cyanobacteria treatments yielded no significant differences (data not shown).