Literature DB >> 27730750

Volume marker inaccuracies: A cross-sectional survey of infant feeding bottles.

Karleen Gribble1, Nina Berry2, Marko Kerac3,4, Michelle Challinor5.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional examination of the accuracy of volume markers on infant feeding bottles available for sale in Australia between December 2013 and February 2014 was carried out. Ninety-one bottles representing 28 different brands were examined. Eighty-eight bottles were hard sided. Volumes in these bottles were marked in a combination of milliliters and ounces. Thirty-six (41%) bottles claimed compliance with the European standard EN14350, five (6%) with non-existent Australian standards, and forty-seven (54%) bottles had no standard claim. Nineteen bottles (22%) had at least one measured marking outside the tolerance of EN14350. Bottles claiming compliance with EN14350 were not less likely to have inaccurate markings than those that made no claim. More expensive bottles did not have fewer inaccurate markings. Three bottles were disposable liner systems and had particularly large volume inaccuracies (up to 43% outside the marked volume). Inaccurate volume markers on infant feeding bottles are a previously neglected but potentially important source of error in the reconstitution of infant formula. Over-concentrated and under-concentrated infant formula can cause serious illness or malnutrition. Over-concentrated infant formula may contribute to obesity. Bottles with inaccurate volume markers are unfit for purpose; disposable liner bottles are particularly poor in this regard and should be prohibited from having volume markers on the bottle casing. To avoid individual or public harms, well-enforced standards are needed. Guidance for parents, carers, and health professionals is needed to ensure that infant formula is accurately reconstituted.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial feeding; bottle feeding; infant; infant feeding; standards

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27730750      PMCID: PMC6865972          DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  28 in total

1.  Infant metabolic alkalosis and soy-based formula--United States. 1979.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Infant feeding in the 20th century: formula and beikost.

Authors:  S Fomon
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  The infant's ability to self-regulate caloric intake: a case study.

Authors:  L S Adair
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1984-05

4.  Infant feeding in Sydney: a survey of mothers who bottle feed.

Authors:  A M Lilburne; R K Oates; S Thompson; L Tong
Journal:  Aust Paediatr J       Date:  1988-02

5.  Retrospective review of serological testing of potential human milk donors.

Authors:  Ronald S Cohen; Sean C Xiong; Pauline Sakamoto
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Women's perceptions of their healthcare experience when they choose not to breastfeed.

Authors:  Lisa A Wirihana; Alan Barnard
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 7.  Melamine toxicity.

Authors:  Carl G Skinner; Jerry D Thomas; John D Osterloh
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-03

8.  Concentrated milk feeds and their relation to hypernatraemic dehydration in infants.

Authors:  T L Chambers; A E Steel
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Human renal function maturation: a quantitative description using weight and postmenstrual age.

Authors:  Malin M Rhodin; Brian J Anderson; A Michael Peters; Malcolm G Coulthard; Barry Wilkins; Michael Cole; Etienne Chatelut; Anders Grubb; Gareth J Veal; Michael J Keir; Nick H G Holford
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Randomised trial of a ready-to-feed compared with powdered formula.

Authors:  A Lucas; S Lockton; P S Davies
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  3 in total

1.  Infant formula feeding practices associated with rapid weight gain: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica Appleton; Catherine Georgina Russell; Rachel Laws; Cathrine Fowler; Karen Campbell; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Volume marker inaccuracies: A cross-sectional survey of infant feeding bottles.

Authors:  Karleen Gribble; Nina Berry; Marko Kerac; Michelle Challinor
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Unintentional error in formula preparation and its simulated impact on infant weight and adiposity.

Authors:  Abby D Altazan; L Anne Gilmore; Juen Guo; David M Rosenberg; Danielle Toupo; Aaron Gowins; Jeffrey H Burton; Robbie A Beyl; Carson C Chow; Kevin D Hall; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.