Literature DB >> 27730623

Can estimates of genetic effective population size contribute to fisheries stock assessments?

J R Ovenden1, G M Leigh2, D C Blower1,3, A T Jones1,4, A Moore5, C Bustamante1,6, R C Buckworth7, M B Bennett6, C L Dudgeon1,6.   

Abstract

Sustainable exploitation of fisheries populations is challenging to achieve when the size of the population prior to exploitation and the actual numbers removed over time and across fishing zones are not clearly known. Quantitative fisheries' modeling is able to address this problem, but accurate and reliable model outcomes depend on high quality input data. Much of this information is obtained through the operation of the fishery under consideration, but while this seems appropriate, biases may occur. For example, poorly quantified changes in fishing methods that increase catch rates can erroneously suggest that the overall population size is increasing. Hence, the incorporation of estimates of abundance derived from independent data sources is preferable. We review and evaluate a fisheries-independent method of indexing population size; inferring adult abundance from estimates of the genetic effective size of a population (Ne ). Recent studies of elasmobranch species have shown correspondence between Ne and ecologically determined estimates of the population size (N). Simulation studies have flagged the possibility that the range of Ne /N ratios across species may be more restricted than previously thought, and also show that declines in Ne track declines in the abundance of model fisheries species. These key developments bring this new technology closer to implementation in fisheries science, particularly for data-poor fisheries or species of conservation interest.
© 2016 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ne; absolute abundance; fishery-independent data; linkage disequilibrium; sustainable exploitation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27730623     DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fish Biol        ISSN: 0022-1112            Impact factor:   2.051


  7 in total

1.  Three-year monitoring of genetic diversity reveals a micro-connectivity pattern and local recruitment in the broadcast marine species Paracentrotus lividus.

Authors:  Sylvain Couvray; Stéphane Coupé
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic Diversity and Variation in Mitochondrial COI Gene in Wild and Hatchery Populations of Saxidomus purpuratus.

Authors:  Woo-Seok Gwak; Animesh Roy
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Clipperton Atoll as a model to study small marine populations: Endemism and the genomic consequences of small population size.

Authors:  Nicole L Crane; Juliette Tariel; Jennifer E Caselle; Alan M Friedlander; D Ross Robertson; Giacomo Bernardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Population structure, connectivity, and demographic history of an apex marine predator, the bull shark Carcharhinus leucas.

Authors:  Agathe Pirog; Virginie Ravigné; Michaël C Fontaine; Adrien Rieux; Aude Gilabert; Geremy Cliff; Eric Clua; Ryan Daly; Michael R Heithaus; Jeremy J Kiszka; Philip Matich; John E G Nevill; Amy F Smoothey; Andrew J Temple; Per Berggren; Sébastien Jaquemet; Hélène Magalon
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Effective number of white shark (Carcharodon carcharias, Linnaeus) breeders is stable over four successive years in the population adjacent to eastern Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Danielle Davenport; Paul Butcher; Sara Andreotti; Conrad Matthee; Andrew Jones; Jennifer Ovenden
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Pedigree analysis and estimates of effective breeding size characterize sea lamprey reproductive biology.

Authors:  Ellen M Weise; Kim T Scribner; Jean V Adams; Olivia Boeberitz; Aaron K Jubar; Gale Bravener; Nicholas S Johnson; John D Robinson
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes.

Authors:  Matthew Carl Yates; Thais A Bernos; Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.