Sleep clinical record: what differences in school and preschool children?

The sleep clinical record (SCR) may be a valid method for detecting children with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). This study aimed to evaluate whether there were differences in SCR depending on age and to identify the possible risk factors for OSA development. We enrolled children with sleep disordered breathing between 2013 and 2015, and divided them according to age into preschool- and school-age groups. All patients underwent SCR and polysomnography. OSA was detected in 81.1% and 83.6% of preschool- and school-age groups, respectively. Obesity, malocclusions, nasal septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy were significantly more prevalent in school-age children (p<0.05); however, only tonsillar hypertrophy had significant hazard ratio (2.3) for OSA development. Saddle nose, nasal hypotonia, oral breathing and tonsillar hypertrophy were significantly more prevalent for development of OSA in preschoolers (p<0.03). The SCR score was significantly higher among preschool children than in school-age children (8.4±2.22 versus 7.9±2.6; p=0.044). Further, SCR score >6.5 had a sensitivity of 74% in predicting OSA in preschool children with positive predictive value of 86% (p=0.0001). Our study confirms the validity of the SCR as a screening tool for patient candidates for a PSG study for suspected OSA, in both school and preschool children.

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is characterised by repeated episodes of prolonged partial upper airway obstruction (obstructive hypopnoea) and/or intermittent complete obstruction (obstructive apnoea) that disturb normal sleep pattern and normal ventilation during sleep, resulting in disruption of normal gas exchange (intermittent hypoxia and hypercapnia) [1-3].

The prevalence of OSAS has been traditionally estimated to be 1–5.7% in the paediatric population [4-6]. In 2011, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) published the practice parameters for the respiratory indications for polysomnography (PSG) in children with sleep disordered breathing (SDB) [7]. It has been reported that evaluation for SDB mostly based on clinical evaluation alone does not have sufficient specificity and sensitivity to establish a diagnosis of OSAS and the gold standard for the diagnosis of SDB is overnight PSG; however, it is also an expensive, time consuming and labour intensive procedure [8].

Several questionnaires have been created and developed in an effort to find a simple screening instrument to identify paediatric subjects who are at high risk for OSAS. Various aetiological factors may underlie OSAS in the paediatric population, including obesity, various craniofacial disorders and hypotonic neuromuscular diseases. The most common cause is thought to be adenotonsillar hypertrophy. It is important to distinguish children with different levels of severity of OSAS using the patient's clinical history and physical examination to identify children in need of PSG prior to adenotonsillectomy. The sleep clinical record (SCR) is a rapid, validated instrument that may effective when used to screen patient candidates for a PSG study for suspected OSAS [8].

Accordingly, the aims of our study were to: evaluate the SCR as a screening tool for suspected OSAS in preschool children; identify whether there were differences in SCR parameters either related to physical examination (including nose, oropharynx, dental and skeletal occlusion) or presenting symptoms according to age; and to identify the possible risk factors for OSAS development at different ages.

Methods

Study design and population

We enrolled 420 children who attended the Pediatric Sleep Disease Centre (Rome, Italy) between 2013 and 2015. Children with genetic disorders, cerebral palsy, neuromuscular diseases, major craniofacial abnormalities, associated chromosomal syndromes and seizures were excluded from the current study. The children were divided into two groups according to their age: preschool children (<6 years old; 292 children, 69.5%) and school-age children (≥ 6 years old; 128 children, 30.5%). All patients underwent laboratory PSG, where the diagnosis of OSAS was confirmed in cases with an obstructive apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥1 event·h−1 according to AASM criteria [7, 9]. Accordingly, the preschool group was divided into two subgroups according to AHI: the obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) subgroup and habitual snoring subgroup, i.e. an AHI <1 event·h−1 and microphone-detected snoring, for further evaluation. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from the parents.

Characteristics of the participants

All children underwent a full clinical history through a questionnaire completed by their parents (including the child's age; age of symptoms onset; sleep symptoms such as habitual snoring, witnessed apnoeic episodes and frequent awakenings or restless sleep). The weight (in kg) and height (in cm) were taken at presentation. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as well as the BMI percentile (pBMI). Children with pBMI ≥95th percentile were considered obese according to the International Obesity Task Force. All children underwent a general clinical examination and an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) and orthodontic assessment.

Sleep clinical record

All the children underwent SCR evaluation, as previously validated by Villa et al. [8]. Briefly, SCR consists of three main items. First, the data yielded by physical examination of the nose, oropharynx and dental and skeletal occlusion. The following signs were considered: signs of oral breathing such as nasal cartilage hypotonia, orbicular muscle hypotonia or rhinolalia; nasal obstruction, considering nostril patency (analysed by blocking one nostril with one finger followed by inspiration through the non-occluded nostril) and inferior turbinate hypertrophy; dental/skeletal malocclusion including pathological palate position graded according to Friedman classes (grade 3 and 4 considered positive) [10]; nasal septum deviation; tonsillar hypertrophy (grades 3 and 4) [11]; obese or adenoid phenotype; and narrow palate. These signs were scored as 2 points (positive sign) versus 0 points (negative sign). Secondly, Brouillette score was calculated from the presented symptoms, mainly apnoea, snoring and restless sleep, and scored as 0.5 points provided that the calculated score was ≥ −1 [12]. Thirdly, the presence of symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity using the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) rating scale for school-aged children, adapted Italian version [13], was considered. An ADHD scale of more than 6 was considered positive and scored as 1 point. A total SCR score of 6.5 was considered positive [8].

PSG and sleep stage scoring

All children underwent laboratory overnight PSG assessment using a Grass Heritage polygraph (Natus Neurology Incorporated – Grass products, Warwich, RI, USA). The variables recorded included an electroencephalogram (EEG) with at least six channels (bilateral frontal, central, temporal and occipital monopolar montages referred to the contralateral mastoid), an electrooculogram (electrodes placed 1 cm above the right outer cantus and 1 cm below the left outer cantus and referred to A1), submental electromyogram (EMG) and ECG (1 derivation). Sleep stages were scored according to the standard criteria of the AASM [9] after subdividing into 30-s epochs. The percentage of total sleep time in each stage was measured as follows: percentage of stage N1, stage N2, stage N3 and stage R (rapid eye movement sleep). Arousals were detected visually according to the criteria reported in the AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events [9].

Central, obstructive and mixed apnoea events were counted according to the criteria established by the AASM [9]. Chest and abdomen movements were measured by strain gauges. Oronasal airflow was recorded by means of a thermocouple and nasal pressure. Arterial oxygen saturation was monitored using pulse oximetry. The obstructive AHI was defined as the average number of obstructive apnoeas and hypopnoeas per hour of sleep. The diagnosis of OSAS was confirmed by means of a laboratory PSG revealing an obstructive AHI ≥1 event·h−1 [9]. Primary snoring was diagnosed in children with habitual snoring, an AHI <1 event·h−1 and microphone-detected snoring.

Statistical analysis

Values are expressed as mean±sd for continuous variables and number and percentage for categorical variables. All variables were tested for normality. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test has been used for categorical variables and independent t-test or Mann–Witney test for continuous variables according to the normal distribution of the available data. Spearman's rho correlation was used to investigate the variables of interest. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the SCR for predicting OSA in preschool children. Power analysis for evaluating the SCR was calculated for our sample size considering α (type I error) equal to 0.05. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression hazard analyses were applied to study different parameters of the SCR in relation to age. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported. All the conducted tests were two-tailed and p<0.05 was considered significant. An SPSS package (PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc. 2009) was used for the analysis.

Results

Study population

The clinical characteristics of the recruited children are summarised in table 1. The mean±sd age of preschool children was 3.96±1.2 years (range 0.91−5.91 years) and that of school-age children was 9.1±2.4 years (range 6.0−17.16 years). In both groups male sex was more frequent (65%). Obesity was significantly more prevalent among the school-age group than among the preschool group (40.6% versus 14.5%; p<0.0001). Furthermore, the SCR score was significantly higher in preschool children compared with the school-age group (8.4±2.22 versus 7.9±2.6; p=0.044). OSA was detected in 81.1% of the preschool group, with a mean±sd AHI of 8.2±8.9 events·h−1, and 83.6% of school-age group, with a mean±sd AHI of 7.7±10.5 events·h−1(p>0.05; table 1). Variable age of onset and duration of symptom development were detected in the children studied.

TABLE 1

Demographic and clinical differences between preschool and school-age children

	Preschool children (<6  years old)	School-age children (≥6 years old)	p-value
Subjects	292 (69.5)	128 (30.5)
Age years	3.96±1.2	9.1±2.4	<0.0001
Males/females	191 (65.4)/101 (34.6)	83 (64.8)/45 (35.2)	0.369
BMI kg·m−2	16.4±2.3	20. 9±5.5	<0.0001
BMI percentile	55±34.8	79.6±37.6	<0.0001
Obesity			<0.0001
Yes	41 (14.5)	52 (40.6)
No	238 (85.3)	76 (59.4)
SCR score	8.4±2.2	7.9±2.6	0.044
Obstructive sleep apnoea			0.680
Yes	237 (81.2)	107 (83.6)
No	55 (18.8)	21 (16.4)
AHI events·h−1	8.2±8.9	7.7±10.5	0.662
Main presenting symptoms
Apnoea	253 (86.6)	82 (64.1)	<0.0001
Snoring	284 (97.3)	116 (90.6)	0.078
Restless sleep	205 (70.2)	79 (61.7)	0.424
History of adenotonsillectomy	3 (1.03)	4 (3.1)	0.465
Associated bronchial asthma	52 (17.8)	25 (19.5)	0.583
SCR parameters
Nasal septal deviation	12 (4.1)	35 (27.3)	<0.0001
Oral breathing scoring	139 (47.6)	44 (34.4)	0.019
Nasal obstruction scoring	244 (83.6)	88 (68.8)	0.003
Arched palate scoring	263 (90.1)	100 (78.1)	0.011
Nasal secretions	168 (57.5)	62 (48.4)	0.139
Nasal mucosal hyperaemia	127 (43.5)	71 (55.5)	0.047
Inferior turbinate hypertrophy	162 (55.5)	91 (71.1)	0.006
Nasal hypotonia	93 (31.8)	28 (21.9)	0.047
Labial hypotonia	83 (28.4)	27 (21.1)	0.055
Saddle nose	97 (33.2)	17 (13.3)	<0.0001
Nasal patency	130 (44.5)	64 (50)	0.511
Habitual nasal obstruction	216 (74)	77 (60.2)	<0.0001
Tonsillar grading score	203 (69.5)	41 (32)	<0.0001
Friedman grading score	57 (19.5)	30 (23.4)	0.361
Angle class scoring	65 (22.3)	45 (35.2)	0.022
Retrognathia/prognathia	47 (16.1)/18 (6.2)	39 (30.5)/6 (4.7)	0.024
Open bite	52 (17.8)	11 (8.6)	0.017
Deep bite	103 (35.3)	43 (33.6)	0.911
Cross bite	72 (24.7)	40 (31.3)	0.151
Overjet	10 (3.4)	15 (11.7)	0.001
Skeletal malocclusion	226 (77.4)	96 (75)	0.902
Positive Brouillette score	248 (85)	99 (77.3)	0.131

Data are presented as n (%) or mean±sd, unless otherwise stated. BMI: body mass index; SCR: sleep clinical record; AHI: apnoea–hypopnoea index. Bold indicates statistical significance.

SCR and PSG

Malocclusions (retrognathia/prognathia) and overjet were significantly more common among school-age children (35.2% (45 children) and 11.7% (15 children); p=0.022 and 0.001, respectively) (table 1). The majority of children with angle malocclusion (40 out of 45 children) were proved to have OSA by PSG as well as for overjet (12 out of 15 children). Furthermore, nasal septal deviation, mucosal hyperaemia and inferior turbinate hypertrophy were significantly more prevalent among school-age children (p<0.05; table 1). However, nasal hypotonia, habitual nasal obstruction, saddle nose, oral breathing, high arched palate, open bite and tonsillar hypertrophy were significantly more common among the preschool group (p<0.05; table 1). In addition, apnoea was a significantly more frequent presentation among the preschool group (p<0.0001; table 1).

81% (237 children) of preschool children were shown to have OSA with mean±sd AHI of 8.2±8.9 events·h−1, while 18.8% (55 children) had an AHI of 0.45±0.3 events·h−1 and were considered habitual snorers, without a significant difference regarding the age of onset (p=0.308). We analysed the SCR using the ROC curve, which showed a score >6.5, providing that ADHD is not included for this age group, had a sensitivity of 74% in predicting OSA in preschool children (AUC 0.663, 95% CI 0.606–0.717; p=0.0001) (figure 1), with a PPV of 86% and positive and negative likelihood ratio of 1.5 and 0.53, respectively, with a power of 91%. Accordingly, 93% of the OSA subgroup had a positive SCR with significantly higher score (8.7±2.2 versus 7.3±1.9 among habitual snorers; p=0.0001). Among the OSA subgroup, the BMI and pBMI were significantly lower compared with the habitual snoring subgroup (p=0.031 and 0.01, respectively).

FIGURE 1

Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the sleep clinical record for predicting obstructive sleep apnoea in preschool children (area under the curve 0.663, 95% CI 0.606–0.717; p=0.0001).

Among the SCR parameters oral breathing score, nasal hypotonia, saddle nose and tonsillar hypertrophy were significantly more commonly detected during clinical examination of preschool children in the OSA subgroup versus those in the habitual snoring subgroup (50.6%, 34.6%, 37.1% and 73.4% versus 31%, 18.2%, 14.5% and 45.5%, respectively; p=0.011, 0.021, 0.002 and <0.0001, respectively).

Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that tonsillar hypertrophy is the only significantly detected risk factor for development of OSA among school-age children with a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.1−4.9; p=0.032). While univariate logistic regression analysis among preschool children showed that a positive SCR is considered a risk factor for development of OSA with hazard ratio of 3.61 (95% CI 1.61−8.11; p=0.002) (table 2). Moreover, different parameters of the SCR showed significant hazard ratios to predict OSA, namely, in order of risk: saddle nose (hazard ratio of 3.42; p=0.002), nasal hypotonia (hazard ratio of 2.34; p=0.024), tonsillar grading score (hazard ratio of 1.82; p<0.0001) and oral breathing score (hazard ratio of 1.49; p=0.012) as items of examination; and apnoea and snoring as items of symptomatology (hazard ratios of 2.8 and 3.51, p=0.005 and 0.026, respectively) (table 2). Furthermore, saddle nose, tonsillar grading score and oral breathing score as well as apnoea were statistically significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis (p=0.003, 0.003, 0.014, and 0.025 respectively; table 3).

TABLE 2

Univariate logistic regression analyses of different variables among preschool children

	B	se	p-value	Hazard ratio (95% CI)
SCR (ADHD not included)	1.284	0.412	0.002	3.61 (1.61–8.11)
Body mass index	−0.021	0.288	0.474	0.81 (0.46–1.43)
Body mass index percentile	−0.370	0.134	0.006	0.69 (0.53–0.9)
Nasal septal deviation	−0.261	0.347	0.453	0.77 (0.39–1.52)
Habitual obstruction	0.658	0.364	0.071	1.93 (0.95–3.94)
Nasal mucosal hyperaemia	−0.524	0.295	0.076	0.59 (0.33–1.06)
Nasal secretions	0.368	0.300	0.219	1.44 (0.8–2.6)
Turbinate hypertrophy	0.483	0.260	0.063	1.62 (0.97–2.7)
Nasal obstruction	0.269	0.183	0.140	1.31 (0.92–1.87)
Oral breathing score	0.402	0.160	0.012	1.49 (1.09–2.05)
Nasal hypotonia	0.851	0.376	0.024	2.34 (1.12–4.9)
Saddle nose	1.229	0.406	0.002	3.42 (1.54–7.58)
Tonsillar grading score	0.599	0.154	<0.0001	1.82 (1.35–2.46)
Friedman Score	0.037	0.193	0.848	1.04 (0.71–1.52)
Arched palate score	0.281	0.434	0.518	1.32 (0.57–3.1)
Angle class (normal versus retrognathia versus prognathia)	0.392	0.293	0.181	1.48 (0.83–2.63)
Angle score	0.349	0.219	0.111	1.42 (0.92–2.18)
Open bite	−0.203	0.379	0.593	0.82 (0.39–1.72)
Deep bite	−0.01	0.315	0.975	0.99 (0.53–1.84)
Cross bite	−0.141	0.347	0.684	0.87 (0.44–1.71)
Overjet	0.739	1.063	0.488	2.09 (0.26–16.8)
Skeletal occlusion	0.085	0.169	0.618	1.09 (0.78–1.52)
Brouillette score	0.357	0.384	0.353	1.43 (0.67–3.03)
Symptoms
Apnoea	1.029	0.364	0.005	2.8 (1.37–5.71)
Snoring	1.254	0.563	0.026	3.51 (1.16–10.56)
Restless sleep	0.252	0.134	0.061	1.29 (0.99–1.67)

SCR: sleep clinical record; ADHD: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Bold indicates statistical significance.

TABLE 3

Multivariate logistic regression analysis (stepwise analysis) of different sleep clinical record items among preschool children

	B	se	p-value	Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Nasal septum deviation	−0.117	0.379	0.758	0.89 (0.42–1.87)
Oral breathing score	0.471	0.191	0.014	1.6 (1.1–2.33)
Nasal obstruction	0.157	0.227	0.49	1.17 (0.75–1.83)
Saddle nose	1.545	0.525	0.003	4.69 (1.67–13.13)
Tonsillar grading score	0.545	0.185	0.003	1.72 (1.2–2.48)
Friedman score	0.148	0.249	0.552	1.16 (0.71–1.89)
Angle score	0.394	0.281	0.162	1.48 (0.85–2.57)
Skeletal occlusion score	0.211	0.203	0.299	1.24 (0.83–1.84)
Apnoea	1.011	0.450	0.025	2.75 (1.14–6.63)
Snoring	0.439	0.675	0.516	1.55 (0.41–5.82)
Constant	−1.76	0.781	0.024	0.17

Bold indicates statistical significance.

Discussion

The current study presents the validity of the SCR, without the ADHD scale, in the evaluation of preschool children suspected to have OSA with a high hazard ratio. In our previous paper [8], we combined both clinical examination and history into the SCR and it was validated for differentiating children with OSA and habitual snoring with increasing probability (89%) if the score was ≥ 6.5. But we did not demonstrate the validity of the SCR in relation to age. In the current study, we demonstrated the validity of the SCR to identify preschool children at risk for OSA with a hazard ratio of 3.6. In addition, we demonstrated that the SCR, using the same cut-off point validated in our previous publication [8], is still valid even with the omission of ADHD rating scale, with a sensitivity of 74% and PPV of 86% to predict OSA indicating the validity of the SCR as an efficient screening tool in preschool children. Further, power analysis for the evaluated SCR was 91%, which indicates a high chance of detecting a difference between OSA and habitual snoring in the preschool children [14]. In our previous study [8], no differences were identified in the percentage of children with a positive ADHD rating scale score between subjects with OSA and primary snorers. Although a significant improvement in diurnal neurobehavioral disorders has been widely demonstrated following adenotonsillectomy [15], the relationship between the severity of OSAS and cognitive deficits is usually weak [16]. In the present study, saddle nose, nasal hypotonia and oral breathing as well as tonsillar hypertrophy are considered as risk factors for development of OSA in preschool children group compared with only tonsillar hypertrophy among school-age children. To our knowledge, there is no specific validated questionnaire predicting OSA in young children <6 years of age. Interestingly, in preschool children the functional and structural aspects (saddle nose, oral breathing and lip hypotonia) associated with tonsillar hypertrophy are considered risk factors in those with OSA; while in school-age children remaining tonsillar hypertrophy and the consequences of oral breathing and nasal obstruction, such as nasal septum deviation and overjet, appear to be associated with the development of OSA. This suggests that identification of children with OSAS can occur early when you consider the importance of not only tonsillar hypertrophy and the presence of OSA, but also persistent oral breathing and loss of function of the nose.

PSG remains the gold standard for SDB diagnosis; however, this tool is still expensive and challenging especially in low resource areas [17, 18]. Several questionnaires have been developed to identify children at risk of OSA [12, 19]. Recently, Bertran et al. [20] and Kadmon et al. [21] demonstrated the validity of simple six- and eight-item paediatric sleep questionnaires, respectively, to identify children with OSA. However, all of these questionnaires have been mainly tested in school-age children.

In accordance with our results, Kang et al. [22] recently found that combining a number of anatomical findings (including adenoid/tonsillar size and obesity) and associated symptoms is effective for screening OSA in children aged from 2 to 18 years old.

Tonsillar hypertrophy is an important risk factor for developing OSA in all age groups, and is the sole risk factor in older children with hazard ratio of 2.3. Kaditis et al. [23] hypothesised that tonsillar tissue in young children with SDB occupies a larger proportion of the oropharyngeal space compared with young subjects without SDB and with older age groups. This proportion may decrease in subjects without SDB, but remains unchanged in children with snoring resulting in persistent restriction of the upper airway lumen [23].

Kang et al. [24] and Dayyat et al. [25] found that tonsils grade was positively correlated with obstructive AHI over a wide range of ages between 1 and 18 years old. Whereas in the current study, the presence of skeletal malocclusion, in the form of angle malocclusion (retrognathia/prognathia) and overjet, was significantly more common among school-age children with OSA compared with the preschool group. Craniofacial anatomical factors are believed to play a significant role in OSAS, together with upper airway compliance and muscle function mechanisms [26, 27]. Deng et al. [28] found that a retrusive mandible and deficient chin are commonly detected in children aged 6–12 years presenting with OSA when compared with healthy controls. Similarly in earlier studies, Hans et al. [29] and Ozdemir et al. [30] found that snoring children have more deficient mandibles and more retrusive mandibles compared with control groups.

The current study illustrates others factors that show significant hazard ratios, in both univariate and multivariate analysis, in predicting OSA in children <6 years of age; in particular, those related to nasal hypotonia and oral breathing as well as saddle nose have significantly higher hazard ratios than tonsillar hypertrophy (tables 2 and 3). This could be explained by multiple factors. First, abnormal nasal resistance developed early in life leads to mouth breathing as well as associated oral–facial hypotonia and abnormal muscle tone [31, 32]. Secondly, infants presenting with abnormal oral–facial features, particularly a high and narrow hard palate, usually have associated oral–facial hypotonia, which has been shown to lead to persistence of abnormal tongue position and presence of mouth breathing detected by PSG in a follow-up study of preterm and full-term infants at 36 months of age [33]. This point concurs with our results as a high arched palate was significantly more prevalent in younger children (90%) compared with the older group (78%). Guilleminault et al. [34] found that persistence of mouth breathing during sleep, related to myofacial hypotonia, led to the recurrence of SDB after surgical management. On the same topic, Villa et al. [35] considered oropharyngeal exercises as a complementary therapy to adenotonsillectomy in childhood OSA. In the current study, the saddle nose deformity in younger age group could be additional anatomical factor increasing nasal resistance and predisposing to oral breathing.

It's worth mentioning that in preschool children, significantly lower BMI was detected among those with OSA, which could be explained on the basis of increased inflammation associated with this disorder [36] affecting growth as demonstrated by Nachalon et al. [37] who reported improved somatic growth in young children aged 6–36 months of age after adenotonsillectomy. By contrast, obesity in the school-age group was significantly more prevalent (40.6%) compared with the preschool group. Obesity is well known as a risk factor for OSA in school-age children and adolescents and frequently coexists [38, 39]. It is worth noting that both OSA and obesity have been assumed to interact and promote one another [40].

Conclusion

The SCR is a valid screening tool in preschool children suspected to have OSA, even without the ADHD rating scale, and it is easy to apply. Oral breathing, nasal hypotonia, saddle nose and tonsillar hypertrophy are more commonly encountered in preschool children with OSA and constitute strong risk factors in this group; while obesity, malocclusions and overjet are more prevalent in school-age children with OSA. These clinical findings could be considered possible consequences of orofacial myofunctional dysfunction, related to SDB, in early life. Although tonsillar hypertrophy represented the single important risk factor for the development of OSA in school- age children, all the clinical parameters of children with SDB should be considered for integrated and resolutive treatment.